Vasant
has 19 followers and is following 19 people
My pile of books are a mile high.
How I love them! How I need them!
I'll have a long beard, by the time I read them."
- Arnold Lobel
- Bombay, India
- member since February 11, 2008
has 19 followers and is following 19 people
Hi there I like ur shelf and I'm starting this new group called fantsy "lovers" if u like fantasy feel free to join....
Greetings,
We don't combine pseudonyms. Shelfari is designing a solution to linking pseudonyms but until they give us that, we keep'em separate.
OK?
Thanks so much for all the work you do on the catalog. I have only one complaint. You work on such interesting titles that I end up buying them! Costing me a fortune. ~smile~
BC
Greetings,
Re your combine request for Clarke's 2001...
The editions that I rejected were either educational support material (Liernmaterilien) or adaptations. Thought you'd like to know the "why."
Good job!
BC
Thanks.
My top 3 favourites are Fantasy / Sci-Fi and Indian Writers in English.
In case u like this, may find a lot of jewels :)
Hi,
RE your combination request for "A Time to Kill" by Grisham...
I am rejecting the request because the new edition is the movie form of the book, not the book itself.
Thanks,
BC
Huh. I see that I did reject that request. I also see that you are correct that they are the same book. I can only imagine I hit the wrong button by mistake. Sorry about that. If you resubmit, I'll see that it gets approved this time.
A
Sometimes when I cant find the second book on a search result like you mentioned, Ill create a temporary series "Randys Temp", add both books to it, do the combine from the series page, and then delete the books from the series.
Not often, but it happens once in awhile.
I've approved these combines. Thanks for your patience and understanding.
Sorry I caused you duplicate work,
BC
Hi,
I processed your combination requests for the various Complete Peanuts. I think I may have made a mistake. The various requests weren't back to back so I didn't see them all lined up. I had thought that each had a "volume n" type entry in error. Now I realize that those volume numbers probably related to how each grouping of years related to each other.
If I did err in this way, please resubmit each to include the "volume n" entry I had rejected.
Sorry!
BC