Book~Adorer

• Rated 3 stars

“It was ok. Not terrible but compared to her other books not that great. She has made some amazing books and I would suggest if you've never read any of Cabot's books to read her others before this one. Some really great ones - How to be popular, Size 12 is not fat, When lightning Strikes, The mediator...”

Book~Adorer wrote this review Wednesday, October 22 2008. ( reply | permalink )

• Rated 3 stars

“I don't quite know how to explain this book. I think essentially this book has a good plot line but Cassidy didn't carry it out to its full potential. It ended up a slow read with a non satisfactory ending. It wasn't terrible but I probably wouldn't recomend it to anybody. There are better books out there ready to be devoured. ”

Book~Adorer wrote this review Wednesday, March 5 2008. ( reply | permalink )

• Rated 3 stars

“I don't think this was an amazing story. But it was still sweet as a modern Romeo and Juliet. The ending was a little bit slap-dash for me, you don't feel as much suffering in this book as you do for the actual Romeo and Juliet story. It was dissapointing, I didn't feel for the characters at all. But I would recomend it for any teen, I think it would be simple and sweet to them. Maybe its because i'm not a teen anymore I feel like it needs more depth.”

Book~Adorer wrote this review Sunday, March 16 2008. ( reply | permalink )

1 of 1 members found this review helpful.

• Rated 2 stars

“When first starting out the book you think this book could go somewhere fun, if not a little raunchy. And you keep reading and reading waiting for it to come....and then you've realized you've read the whole book. And nothing, absolutely nothing happened. You've come full circle and realized that this book was a big waste of time. ”

Book~Adorer wrote this review Monday, February 25 2008. ( reply | permalink )

• Rated 3 stars

“A fluff read. Good for a relaxing day but for some reason I found it a really slow read. I kept getting bored out of the blue. I think it has a great plot line but not enough going on to support it and keep you interested. It was ok. ”

Book~Adorer wrote this review Saturday, February 23 2008. ( reply | permalink )

• Rated 5 stars

“I love this book! Its so sweet and simple. A great one to give your daughter in her romantic stage. ”

Book~Adorer wrote this review Thursday, February 14 2008. ( reply | permalink )

• Rated 4 stars

“Great book! Sad but you need a good grounded book sometimes to make you think. I recomend it 100%! Plus its a quick read i finished it in one sitting.”

Book~Adorer wrote this review Thursday, February 14 2008. ( reply | permalink )

• Rated 1 stars

“I was so excited to read this book. I only got through maybe chapter 9. Totally boring plus i like to read fluff books but this was too fluffy, I wasn't getting anything out of it. I wouldn't recomend it to anybody. It's a waste of time. ”

Book~Adorer wrote this review Thursday, February 14 2008. ( reply | permalink )

• Rated 4 stars

““The reason I gave all the books in this series a 5 and this one only a 4 is cuz i didnt like how it ended. It was kinda weird didnt quite understand the point of it. But the rest of the book before the end is good. And the rest of the books in the series are amazing. I love the series as a whole.”

Book~Adorer wrote this review Friday, February 1 2008. ( reply | permalink )

• Rated 5 stars

“Just finished reading A sweet far thing... i really liked this series alot and didn't think that it could get better, i thought the 3rd book would be a disapointment. and then i read it. and i loved it. Its the best book of all 3. I love reading but im not emotional in any way, (dont laugh or cry) but i cried hard and my husband didnt know what to do with me, he was shocked cuz i'd never done that before. In the first two books all the characters seem questionable, unsure. but they definitely show their true selves in this book. I feel like im parting with great friends, though i feel this is the right ending. It is time to end. ”

Book~Adorer wrote this review Friday, February 1 2008. ( reply | permalink )