Books

Follows you (block)

Requested to follow you (accept | block)

Blocked (unblock)

mmz

mmz

has 7 followers and is following 4 people

  • NY, USA
  • member since February 25, 2008

Reviews

  • Sort by:
 
1 2 3 4 5  | Next » Last 
Displaying 1-10 of 226 reviews
  • His Majesty's Hope
    • Rated 3 stars

    As you can see from my reviews of Winston Churchill's Secretary and Princess Elizabeth's Spy, I predicted that the second Maggie Hope mystery would be better than the first, and I was duly rewarded. I therefore had high hopes for this third installment, but unfortunately, Maggie's mission to Berlin didn't exactly live up to its promise.

    Now with the elite Special Operations Executive, Maggie continues her somewhat maverick approach to acts of derring-do on behalf of His Majesty with a two-pronged mission in Berlin. Unfortunately, most of the people she encounters during her exploits there fail to come alive on the page. Add to that less-than-convincing mission details and some entirely-too-coincidental meet-ups, and this adventure just doesn't measure up. But MacNeal has already proven that she has what it takes in this genre, so I'll continue to hope for good things in future Maggie Hope adventures.

    Two additional notes: First, this book shouldn't really be called a mystery, since there is no mystery to be solved. Second, MacNeal shouldn't feel the need to rip off scenes from tv shows, although I'm sure it was entirely an unconscious thing on her part. She chose one of my favorite scenes from an excellent show (Buffy the Vampire Slayer), but I was still very disappointed. Her writing is strong enough without resorting to copying, even from the greats.

    mmz wrote this review 2 weeks ago. ( reply | permalink )
  • Daughters Who Walk This Path

    Daughters Who Walk This Path

    by Yejide Kilanko
    • Rated 3 stars

    Although both plot and characters are written with very little embellishment, Kilanko is a very effective storyteller. However, there are some puzzling gaps in her narrative. She makes sure we know that it is a big deal that Morayo, the main character, must go far from home, to a different state on the other side of the Niger River, for the training for her National Youth Service Corps year. The distance heightens the element of surprise when she meets Kachi, her teenage beau, at the training site. After only a few pages, though, Morayo informs Kachi that she has been transformed to serve her year much closer to home. As a plot device to remind her readers about Morayo's relationship with Kachi, this is all well and good, but as part of an actual narrative it leaves something to be desired. For the most part, omission of such details doesn't detract from the overall sense of the story, but I found each omission distracting as I had to flip back through the pages to see if I actually had missed something. Finding that I hadn't, each time I could only wonder why Kilanko chose not to add the very few lines that would have provided the missing details.

    mmz wrote this review Wednesday, March 13, 2013. ( reply | permalink )
  • A Thousand Pardons
    • Rated 2 stars

    As a reader, I never really understood the writer's maxim to "show, not tell". I always thought, "I'm being told a story, so what's the big deal?" Until now. Now, I get it.

    This book is about Ben, Helen, and their adopted daughter Sara. In the first part of the book, Dee does a fair job of showing us that Ben and Helen's marriage has fallen apart and the events that bring about its actual end. We are shown how the marriage is dissolved and how Helen has to learn again how to support herself, and now her 12 year old daughter. So far, so good.

    Dee starts to get into trouble when Helen and Sara move to Manhattan. Helen becomes more involved with the PR firm she now works for and Sara starts attending a new school. Sara tells us that her mother has basically started letting her raise herself. But, aside from the fact that Sara must order dinner for herself and her mother most nights, and that she becomes very devious about skipping both school and the after-school activities she's supposed to be participating in, we aren't ever shown what Helen has done to make Sara fling the accusations at her that she finally does. Combine that with Sara being a generally unlikeable character to begin with, and the sections involving her are fairly unreadable.

    All of which makes me wonder why Dee included Sara's plot-line to begin with. The much more interesting aspect of this book is Helen's new job and her views on (and success with) apologies. The title suggests that this was supposed to be the main story of the book, but it gets very little space. Instead, Helen's supposed talent becomes something else that we are told, without really being shown how or why it works or is important to the overall story. This is a shame, because a focus on apologies and how they impact public relations would have made a much better story.

    mmz wrote this review Wednesday, November 14, 2012. ( reply | permalink )
  • Ice Bound
    • Rated 3 stars

    memoir, Antarctica, breast cancer

    mmz wrote this review Friday, November 2, 2012. ( reply | permalink )
  • Princess Elizabeth's Spy
    • Rated 4 stars

    In my review of Winston Churchill's Secretary, the first of the Maggie Hope books, I said that the series showed promise as MacNeal settled into her talents as a writer. With this second installment, MacNeal is certainly starting to live up to that promise. Although some of the language is still a bit clunky (and there are far too many mentions of birds), the story itself flows much more smoothly than it did in the first book and MacNeal takes fewer shortcuts to get her characters in and out of situations.

    Newly installed with MI-5, Maggie Hope is placed at Windsor Castle at Christmas in 1940. Posing as Princess Elizabeth's math tutor, she is really there to ferret out a possible plot against the future queen's life. Descriptions of life at Windsor Castle during this period are well-done, and glimpses of historical personages are clearly well-researched. Once again, MacNeal does an excellent job bringing to life a fascinating aspect of Britain during WWII, while at the same time allowing Maggie to grow as a character and as a spy. I look forward to reading more!

    mmz wrote this review Tuesday, October 9, 2012. ( reply | permalink )
  • The Sandcastle Girls
    • Rated 3 stars

    For all that this is a book that centers on a genocide, it's not very compelling. There are two stories told in parallel, neither of which I found particularly engaging. The primary story is the one that takes place during the 1915 Armenian genocide. It's the story of Elizabeth, a recent Mount Holyoke graduate who travels to Aleppo with her father on a mission of humanitarian relief (although in her father's case it seems to have more to do with making sure his money is being responsibly spent). In Aleppo, Elizabeth meets Armen, an Armenian engineer. Although Armen presumes that his wife and daughter are dead, victims of the Turkish transportation, he is in Aleppo hoping to find someone who accompanied them across the desert and can tell him what exactly happened to them. This might have made Armen a tragic and interesting character, except that he more or less abandons his quest the moment he meets Elizabeth. He is drawn to her because her cheekbones remind him of his wife's, and he falls in love with her almost instantly. The attraction is mutual, if not entirely believable, and the rest of the story is a foregone conclusion, and would be even if we did not already know the end of their story from their granddaughter.

    The second story is told by Laura, Armen and Elizabeth's granddaughter, a writer who knows very little about her Armenian heritage (although, to be fair, she doesn't seem to know that much about her Boston Brahmin heritage either). She is drawn into researching her history when a friend forwards her a photograph of someone with her last name from an exhibition focusing on the Armenian genocide. Her story of discovering her grandparent's history is interesting, but lacks emotional heft, although that may be because I found her grandparent's story itself to also lack spark.

    Put together, we get two stories, neither of which is adequately fleshed out. Perhaps if Bohjalian had chosen to tell a single story, there would have been more room to create a more fully-realized world, and fewer characters who are simply shadows (Elizabeth's father, Armen's wife, and so on). Likewise, if Bohjalian had chosen to tell only the historical story (adding the contemporary story seems like little more than self-indulgence on his part), he might have been able to actually help his readers understand more about the Genocide You Know Nothing About (as he has Laura call it). Instead, I found myself confused by how Syria figured into the Armenian story, what the Germans were doing there, and what the Turks had against the Armenians in the first place (though I suspect most of the Armenians were asking the same question) and unconvinced both by Armen and Elizabeth's love affair and by Laura's historical quest.

    mmz wrote this review Saturday, September 22, 2012. ( reply | permalink )
  • The Red House
    • Rated 3 stars

    I know that it's a perfectly valid literary technique to write in fragments rather than full sentences. I know that frequent jumps from one character's perspective to another is also quite acceptable. But I find books that do either too much, let alone both, very hard to read. And yes, Haddon employs both techniques throughout this book. So you may take my less-than-positive feelings about this book with a grain of salt, but there it is.

    That being said, Haddon definitely made the right choice to write this book from the perspective of all the characters. If he had tried to write it from the perspective of a single character there would have been no there there. But the perspective changes so quickly (in some cases a character has only a single paragraph) and with only an extra line space between shifts that it can be kind of dizzying. Unfortunately, it was very hard for me to enjoy this jumpy narrative.

    mmz wrote this review Wednesday, August 8, 2012. ( reply | permalink )
  • The Submission
    • Rated 4 stars

    For this story to work, we all have to cast our minds back to 2003, a scant two years after the 9/11 attacks, and remember how raw those attacks still felt. Only then can we all ask ourselves the question: would I have supported a memorial designed by a secular Muslim-American if it had been chosen under these circumstances? Hopefully, we can all answer honestly that we would have. And if perhaps we wouldn't have then, certainly with the distance of additional decade, we can all say we would now. But that's almost beside the point because Waldman gives us multiple points of view without forcing us to choose.

    Waldman recreates the mood of post-9/11 New York City without pulling her punches. Numerous sides get their share of the story-telling: the widow who tries to be fair-minded; politicos who try to pander to all sides without, of course, ever appearing to; the brother of a firefighter who has made being anti-Islam his personal cause; other anti-Islamists who aren't afraid to piggy-back on the fear of the time, even though they didn't lose anyone in the attacks; the reporter who get the leak about the story of the Muslim who won the anonymous competition to design the 9/11 memorial. If some of these sides are presented more as caricatures than fully fleshed-out characters, that's almost beside the point too as this is a not a character-driven story.

    This book has other flaws, perhaps the biggest one being that too many things seem to be beside the point, including things like the motivation of the person who leaked the news about the designer of the memorial, and whether anyone ever found out who it was. But Waldman does well to keep her story focused on what does matter - the conflicts, internal and external that arise in a situation like this. Overall, this is a very well written and thoughtful piece of fiction that could all too easily have been non-fiction, which is something we would all do well to remember.

    mmz wrote this review Monday, July 2, 2012. ( reply | permalink )
  • A Mind of Winter

    A Mind of Winter

    by Shira Nayman
    • Rated 2 stars

    This book got off to a very promising start for me. Nayman's initial narrator (Oscar) said something that gave me an instant feeling of connection. But, after only a few pages with this narrator, and just as things are starting to get interesting, we are abruptly thrust into a new time and place, and given a narrator (Christine) with whom I not only felt no connection, but couldn't even bring myself to be really interested in at all. I was so turned off by this section of the book, that I had a hard time feeling any investment in the the next section, even though I felt at least some connection with this third narrator (Marilyn). Both Christine and Marilyn hint at some dark secret from Oscar's past that they think they know, though both do it in such a jumpy, pseudo-tantalizing fashion that by the time we hear Oscar's voice again I was more relieved that all the games were coming to an end than actually interested in what the secret was.

    It's a shame that the story felt so herky-jerky, because I think that if Nayman had kept Oscar's voice as the sole narrator throughout the book her story would have had the emotional impact she was going for. Instead, by throwing in so many extraneous plot points and red herrings (Christine's opium addiction and Marilyn's conflicting feelings about her wartime photography, among others) she's declawed what could have been a powerful story.

    mmz wrote this review Friday, June 22, 2012. ( reply | permalink )
  • Worldshaker
    • Rated 1 stars

    This book gets one star for having an interesting premise (a juggernaut on wheels that travels the earth after Europe is devastated in an alternate version of the Napoleonic Wars). Beyond that, though, this book is terrible.

    Every author is faced with the question of how to convey needed information to the reader. After all, the reader must somehow learn the background of the characters and something of the world in which the book is set. Some authors choose to do this through the voice of the narrator, others use dialogue and allow one or more characters to explain what's needed to another. Both choices can work if done properly, and each has inherent narrative pitfalls that must be avoided.

    The biggest problem that an author who chooses the dialogue approach must overcome is that of the ignorant character. This character must be believably ignorant (so that the explanations come in the natural course of the narrative), but not so ignorant as to become unsympathetic. This is the trap into which Harland falls. His main character (Colbert) is the grandson of the Supreme Commander of the Worldshaker (a person second in significance of the juggernaut only to the queen and her consort). The book opens with the announcement that Colbert is to be his grandfather's successor. Colbert is 16, and so ignorant as not to be believable He's never met any of his peers in his relatively small social class (even though it's clear they've all met each other) and has clearly never received any kind of instruction in social skills, let alone in how to run a city-sized juggernaut. If Colbert were actually written to be an idiot, I might have found this easier to believe, but he's not. It turns out that he's a smart, thoughtful boy, who, if he were better-written, would have asked the questions that come up in the book long ago.

    Harland would have done better to have a little more faith in his reader and not assumed that his readers are as forcibly ignorant as he makes his main character be.

    mmz wrote this review Wednesday, May 2, 2012. ( reply | permalink )
1 2 3 4 5  | Next » Last 
Displaying 1-10 of 226 reviews