Books

Request Friendship
Send Request Cancel

Kaye Dacus

Kaye Dacus

  • member since August 10 2007

Reviews

  • Sort by:
 
  • A Constant Heart
    • Rated 3 stars

    I just finished reading this book, and was somewhat disappointed in it.

    From the back cover copy, I expected it to be more of a romance than a commentary on the usage of cosmetics in the 16th Century. And I don't know if it was on purpose or not, but she definitely captured the tedium of the era in the narrative. If you're more interested in the details of court life in Queen Elizabeth I's reign, you'll probably enjoy this book. But if you're looking for a historical romance, this might not fit the bill.

    Kaye Dacus wrote this review Thursday, October 9 2008. ( reply | permalink )
  • Daring Chloe
    • Rated 4 stars

    Laura Jensen Walker's books are always fun to read, and usually when I pick up one of her books, by the bottom of the first page, I wonder exactly when it is that she tapped into my brain. I didn't connect with the main character, Chloe, that directly in this novel, however it is for the most part a very enjoyable read. One of the things I appreciate about this work of chick lit is that it doesn't revolve around the heroine's job---or loss of her job. Though she's fearful, she's not angst-ridden like most chick-lit heroines. She's down-to-earth and relatable. The idea of a group of women of different ages and backgrounds not only forming a book club but planning 'adventures' based on the novels they're reading makes me want to go out and start a similar group. However, a couple of times, I found myself skimming through a lot of their discussions of the books (or the rabbit-trail conversations these discussions led to) because they didn't seem to further the plot much---and they came across as somewhat of an advertisement for certain books or movies. But each adventure the ladies went on were fun and reasonable. I love the fact that they had to save for a year to take their trip to Paris instead of being able to just pick up and go at a moment's notice, as would happen in many other chick-lit books.

    Where I did get a little frustrated was in the last 25% of the book, which is basically a travelogue of Paris. Not being enthralled with Paris/all-things-French myself, the frequent use of French words/phrases/sentences and the blow-by-blow of everything the ladies do in Paris got a little tedious for me. But if you love Paris and have always wanted to visit, you'll probably thoroughly enjoy that part. All-in-all, though, an enjoyable read and a great start to a new series by one of my favorite authors.

    Kaye Dacus wrote this review Thursday, October 9 2008. ( reply | permalink )
  • For Better or For Worse
    • Rated 4 stars

    I picked up this book primarily because it's a contemporary romance that revolves around someone involved in the wedding industry. With my own contemporary romance featuring a wedding planner set to release in January 2009, I'm very curious about the seeming influx of books in the past few months (and coming out over the next few) that center around weddings/the wedding industry.

    In For Better or for Worse, Wendy Hartline is a forty-four year old widow who runs a wedding chapel in the Smokey Mountains of Tennessee. Her husband of twenty years died three years ago. She has a twenty-three-year-old daughter whose husband just walked out on her and a nineteen year old son who's away in college. Wendy is dating college professor Logan, whom I'll discuss in a moment. However, it's Marco Amorini who is of primary concern. You see, the playboy divorce lawyer has just purchased the building next door to Wendy's wedding chapel. He's converting it into a "Lodge" which includes a restaurant and hotel/honeymoon retreat--in direct competition with the four honeymoon cabins Wendy owns.

    Though Wendy finds Marco attractive, her opinion of him is originally colored by Logan's nasty attitude toward Marco. Marco was Logan's ex-wife's divorce lawyer. In the way of most romance novels, Wendy and Marco are constantly thrown together by circumstances. And it doesn't matter when or where they're together, whether they're having a pleasant conversation, whether Wendy's legs have just given out on her (she has a condition) and she's in Marco's arms, or whether Wendy and Marco are at each other's throats, Logan is sure to show up. So sure, in fact, that it gets downright annoying--a little too over-the-top when it comes to creating conflict. It made me feel like Logan may be a stalker.

    Not only does Logan show up at very inopportune moments, he is one of the most selfish, self-centered, immature characters I've had the displeasure of reading in a very long time. When Marco invites Wendy and her entire family, including Logan, to dine at the Lodge, Logan, like a petulant three-year-old, gripes about everything, from his steak being tough to his coffee being cold. He's rude to Marco and snaps at Wendy and ends up walking out. Not only does he never apologize to Wendy for his behavior, his behavior and attitude toward Marco worsens.

    From the beginning of the novel, I didn't understand why Wendy would have been seeing someone like Logan--he had no redeeming qualities that were shown to the reader. But as his behavior worsened, I found it harder and harder to want to continue reading the book. Wendy came across as a codependent pushover when it came to Logan. Though it was part of her character arc for her to go from being the kind of person who wants to please everyone at her own expense to someone who'll stand up for herself, I still found it highly unlikely--and unlikable--that Wendy would put up with Logan as long as she did. Especially once he started dropping by unannounced, calling after he said he wouldn't (and calling multiple times, demanding an explanation for why she hadn't been home when he called the first time) and, basically, showing all the signs of being an overbearing, possessive, manipulative, jealous STALKER.

    In the last quarter of the book, when Logan goes away for a conference, my enjoyment of the story really picked up. Wendy and Marco, aside from owning businesses next door to each other, are brought even closer together when they discover his daughter and her son (the nineteen-year-old) are engaged. At first, Marco wants Wendy's help to break them up. But Wendy, who married even younger and had a happy marriage (Marco's ended badly), ends up supporting the kids (though makes a big mistake and nearly breaks them up after making the decision to support them--which was very realistic and well-written conflict).

    Here are the reasons why, even though I enjoyed reading this book, I couldn't give it five stars:
    --Logan. I hated him. His character was way over the top when it came to his attitude, jealousy, and STALKING of Wendy. And it took her until just a few pages before the end of the book to finally break up with him. If this hadn't been on my reading list, I might have put the book down about halfway through out of frustration and not finished reading it.

    --POV. The book is written in first person, present tense, my LEAST favorite POV (of course, that's because I've never been forced to read anything written in second person).

    --Not really wedding-industry related. Wendy really could have been the owner of any small business threatened by the hero opening a similar business next door. No weddings played any role in the story. And aside from putting Marco at odds with Logan--because Marco was the ex-wife's lawyer--the fact that Marco is a divorce lawyer doesn't really have any impact on the story.

    --At one point in the story, when Marco and Wendy are discussing Logan's attitude toward Marco, Marco hints that there's more to the story, that Wendy shouldn't believe everything Logan says about what happened when Logan's wife left him. But this is never followed up on, leaving me wondering if Logan's wife left him because he was an overbearing, possessive, manipulative, jealous STALKER.

    What I did like:
    --Subtle, realistic Christian worldview. In the very end, when Wendy is trying to get her daughter to pray, to choose to develop a relationship with God, she does push a little bit, but it was in a very realistic way. The daughter, however, told Wendy that she (the daughter) couldn't have a relationship with God just because Wendy (the mom) did; again, very realistic. Wendy's spiritual journey is subtle, as is Marco's (in fact, Marco's reconciliation to God is really just hinted at and never actually expounded upon).

    --Once Logan was out of the picture, the story picked up pace and seemed less oppressive.

    --I read in the acknowledgments that Diann thanked her crit partners for forcing her to put her characters into conflict, and not to hold back or let them out of it easily. While in one area (Logan) it was overdone, the rest of the conflicts in the story were relatable and made me truly sympathize with Wendy. Some of them were quite predictable, while others came out of the blue.

    A good read that I would recommend to anyone interested in reading a romance that's more on the "hen lit" side of the genre than an actual "romance."

    Kaye Dacus wrote this review Wednesday, May 28 2008. ( reply | permalink )
  • The Bourne Identity
    0 of 1 members found this review helpful.
    • Rated 0 stars

    I think I may "read" this one on audio!

    Kaye Dacus wrote this review Thursday, February 7 2008. ( reply | permalink )
  • Shadow Music: A Novel
    • Rated 0 stars

    I must admit, I had a really hard time finishing this book. The setup is way too long and tedious. There are so many characters, it's hard to keep straight who's who. The hero and heroine don't meet until around page 160. There is so much unimportant backstory in the first 100 or so pages that I found myself either setting it down after a page of tedium or choosing to pick up something else to read instead of this.

    I used to be able to knock out a J.G. historical romance in one or two evenings--and usually stayed up until the wee hours of the morning because I couldn't put the book down. I'm not emotionally invested in either of the main characters, nor do I care about the conflict that has brought them together. Then, once they do come together, their interactions are cliched *shadows* of the same dialogue, same physical reactions, same physical descriptions, same actions (of course he drags her onto his horse in front of him and his thighs are warm and rock-solid) as in every other historical romance out there.

    As a professional editor and freelance critiquer, if this story had come across my desk as a manuscript, I would have lopped off the first 100 pages, suggested she condense the setup to about ten pages, get Colm and Gabrielle together much sooner, cut out the cliches, keep the story to just their Points of View, not name and give backstory to every single minor character who walks on stage, and focus on their relationship, not all of the "intrigue" that's not in the least intriguing. I also would have corrected the blatant and glaring copy-editing mistakes/slip-ups, such as using the present-tense "bid" when the past-tense "bade" was needed, or use of a homonym, such as "aid" (to give support)for "aide" (a person who supports).

    This book didn't deserve to be published, when there are so many other superbly written manuscripts languishing on publishers' desks simply because the authors don't have the name recognition of Julie Garwood. I was very disappointed in both Garwood and the publisher.

    Kaye Dacus wrote this review Wednesday, May 28 2008. ( reply | permalink )
  • The Return of the King
    • Rated 4 stars

    My favorite of the trilogy . . . except for the whole "Sharkey" thing at the end. Thought Peter Jackson & Crew did the story a great service by cutting that part out!

    Kaye Dacus wrote this review Thursday, February 7 2008. ( reply | permalink )
  • The Two Towers
    • Rated 4 stars

    As part of my goal to read the entire trilogy, I read The Two Towers in January. Though I do have to say that I mostly skimmed/skipped most of the second half--Frodo & Sam's journey--except for the part when they were with Faramir in Ithilien.

    Kaye Dacus wrote this review Thursday, February 7 2008. ( reply | permalink )
  • The Fellowship of the Ring
    • Rated 4 stars

    Late in 2007, I decided I needed to read the trilogy all the way through instead of just the bits and pieces here and there (mostly about Eomer and Prince Imrahil) that I'd previously read. I finished reading FOTR just after Christmas.

    Kaye Dacus wrote this review Thursday, February 7 2008. ( reply | permalink )
  • The Darkest Evening of the Year
    • Rated 1 stars

    I read about the first third of this book and then took it back to the library. It was my first try at reading Dean Koontz and I was highly disappointed. Much of the narrative comes across as Mr. Koontz writing a nonfiction book about Golden Retrievers. The villain, whose scenes were written in a different style POV than the protagonists', were so far out there, so vulgar, sadistic, and psychologically twisted, that I didn't want to read his scenes.

    I might try reading another Dean Koontz book sometime in the future, but I was extremely put off by this one.

    Kaye Dacus wrote this review Wednesday, May 28 2008. ( reply | permalink )
  • When the Wind Blows
    • Rated 4 stars

    I enjoyed reading this book much more than I expected, especially since Patterson breaks just about every rule I know about writing (telling, passive verbs, POV, etc.). In today's entertainment marketplace, between the X-Men movies and Heroes TV show, the idea of mutant humans with super powers or feathered wings isn't as edgy as it probably was in 1998 when this book was originally published. But, because of their popularity, makes this book still viable and competitive. My only lingering question when I got to the end was: what was David's role in the research? His involvement is never disclosed---and maybe that's a setup for the sequel. It was apparently marketed as a "thriller," but I never got that part. Yes, it is suspenseful in places, but Heroes has more "thriller" elements in one episode than this book did. Highly enjoyable read---this is the first book I've read in years where I had a hard time putting it down.

    Kaye Dacus wrote this review Wednesday, November 14 2007. ( reply | permalink )

Missing a review?