Books

Follows you (block)

Requested to follow you (accept | block)

Blocked (unblock)

Liz S

Liz S

has 7 followers and is following 4 people

I'm one of those people whose life goal is to never actually finish school. I recently received my Master's in English literature and am now pursuing a Ph.D. in the same field. My scholarly interests lie primarily in literature written in the Victorian Era and my approach looks at how new developments in computers and computation can provide... more »
  • Goleta, CA, USA
  • member since September 4, 2009

Reviews

  • Sort by:
 
1 2 3 4 5  | Next » Last 
Displaying 1-10 of 230 reviews
  • Waverley - Complete

    Waverley - Complete

    by Walter Scott
    • Rated 4 stars

    This was delightful, where has Scott been all my life?

    Liz S wrote this review Saturday, February 16, 2013. ( reply | permalink )
  • Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality
    • Rated 3 stars

    I realize that rating for legibility is a very strange approach, though this bumped up from a two to a three because it was readable.
    And because all the bits that made my skin crawl were things I had already known about Freud's theories, particularly of infant sexuality and development. It's just strange to read the original and remember that people did, in fact, think like this.
    The rest of the work, the things I had not encountered elsewhere, actually made me appreciate the man more.

    Liz S wrote this review Friday, January 18, 2013. ( reply | permalink )
  • The Sound and the Fury
    • Rated 3 stars

    I always feel...guilty is perhaps not the right word, but uneasy when I am simply whelmed by the work that one of the greatest authors of the 20th century has done.
    It's not that I wasn't impressed with The Sound and the Fury, because in many ways I was. Although I found that, given everything I had heard about the Benjy section, it was kinda disappointing in its comprehensibility (I might be the only person who has ever said that).

    It was good. It just didn't thrill me.

    Liz S wrote this review Friday, January 18, 2013. ( reply | permalink )
  • Robinson Crusoe
    • Rated 2 stars

    Not that I enjoy piling the dislike on the first novel written in English (actually, that's a lie), but this book is at its best/most useful when it works as an object lesson in novel aesthetics and how what we once appreciated in a book is entirely different from what we currently appreciate.
    It's difficult to discuss whether this is a good book or not, given its popularity when it was first published. Yet I found the style of storytelling to be entirely at odds with the conventions I am used to, as though Defoe deliberately set out to spend too much time on the boring bits and downplay the excitement of being shipwrecked on a desert island, surviving and going to battle.
    But, as I said, aesthetics.

    Liz S wrote this review Sunday, January 13, 2013. ( reply | permalink )
  • Captain Vorpatril's Alliance
    • Rated 4 stars

    I love...everything about this book!

    Liz S wrote this review Saturday, November 10, 2012. ( reply | permalink )
  • Anathem
    • Rated 5 stars

    Stephenson is a...polarizing writer. He tends to break what are thought of as the rules of writing (show, don't tell; don't use massive, chapter-long infodumps; focus on character; etc.) and produces literature that is a story wrapped around ideas, rather than ideas that tell a story.
    Of course, I think he does it extremely well and I don't read his books for deep character insights, but for the usually absurdly detailed and complex philosophical problems wrapped in several explosions that make up the storyline. It's a matter of expectations.
    Anyway, I loved Anathem. I thought the premise was brilliant and I found Erasmas to be a surprisingly compelling character (by Stephenson's standards, of course). But the weirdness of the story and how he weaves in surprisingly complicated Platonic ideals with Derridean take-downs and...
    Anyway, if you liked Snow Crash, read Cryptonomicon and if you liked Cryptonomicon, read Anathem. It is well worth your time.

    Liz S wrote this review Wednesday, October 3, 2012. ( reply | permalink )
  • Old Man's War
    • Rated 4 stars

    I really like John Scalzi. He has this amazing talent to get me to read books that are usually far out of my ordinary interests (I say I don't like military sf. We ignore my obsession with Miles Vorkosigan when I say this).
    He's also funny. Not in a Douglas Adams sense, but in the sense that his characters have great senses of humor and he is brilliant at the subtle deadpan. Okay, so maybe a little like Douglas Adams.
    But there's a deeply interesting story at the heart of the book and an adventurous attempt, on Scalzi's part to portray both age and was through as clear a gaze as possible.
    What can I say; I really liked this book and was more than a bit impressed by it. Well done, where's the next one?

    Liz S wrote this review Thursday, September 13, 2012. ( reply | permalink )
  • Mastiff
    • Rated 4 stars

    In some ways, I am still surprised every time I pick up a new Tamora Pierce book. I keep expecting to get the same style of writing in Song of the Lioness and, like most authors, she does not remain stagnant.

    I say this because Mastiff feels like more of a break than usual from her earlier works. Overall, this series has been very different (and, unlike the Daughter of the Lioness duology, quite good), but the pacing still felt a bit off to me. I kept waiting for things to happen that took an appallingly long time to occur.

    That being said, I have like Beka Cooper from the beginning and I really do think this trilogy is a welcome addition to the Tortallan stories. Other than pacing, my one quibble is with character. Someone behaves a certain way and it was jarringly out of character to me. Which is odd, because Pierce is usually really REALLY good with characters in character. So this slip was doubly disappointing.

    Realistically, if you've made it this far with Pierce's books, you'll appreciate Mastiff. It's a master storyteller doing what she does best.

    Liz S wrote this review Thursday, September 13, 2012. ( reply | permalink )
  • The Marriage Plot
    • Rated 3 stars

    I suppose this is proof positive that delight in the topicality of a novel does not guarantee liking it.
    This book was solidly, decidedly meh. As my mom put it when we were discussing it, "whatever he was trying to do, he didn't".
    I had two main issues with the book. When i started it, I rather loathed all the main characters for being...unselfaware, I suppose. The narrator refused to give in to their self image, so we read them without the kindness at comes from giving people over into their own views of themselves. And I did grow to like two of them, at around the time it seemed the narrator expected me too. But the third...it seemed to me that the narrator expected me to like and empathize with him LONG before I was willing to.
    And this was the character whose voice fit closest to the narrator's. I was disappointed that the narrator didn't feel like a fourth character, but like this third character. I wanted each character to have an individual voice, but they all felt mediated through Mitchell's tone and Mitchell's gaze. And, for a book that's savvy enough to laugh at deconstruction, it is surprisingly incapable of escaping the male gaze.
    But I am profoundly grateful that it ended the way it did. The end was exactly right. I just wish the execution had been better.

    Liz S wrote this review Friday, March 8, 2013. ( reply | permalink )
  • The Long Earth
    • Rated 4 stars

    In the words of someone or other, this had BETTER be a series.
    If you're expecting Pratchett, it had better be the Pratchett of "Nation" rather than of the Discworld. Which is a compliment; it means the man can write in more than one register.
    At any rate, this book sits in that weird space between science fiction and fantasy that I tend to think of as speculative fiction. And speculative it is. Pratchett (and yes, I know I seem to be ignoring Baxter here, but I've never read the man so I can't really think about his authorial tendencies) has never been particularly subtle and this book is very much in the tradition of philosophical speculative fiction that forces questions on you whether you want them or not. That being said, the sly wink that is Pratchett's humor, though not as blatant, is still felt throughout the pages and it makes the book feel oddly distorted, as if it does not quite into any genre because it is, stylewise, its own thing.
    It was a fascinating read, much slower paced and mellower than Discworld, but enjoyable nonetheless and the way that both the science and the people are handled makes this a good science fiction book for people who dislike hard sci-fi.
    Now when's the bloody sequel coming out!?

    Liz S wrote this review Wednesday, August 29, 2012. ( reply | permalink )
1 2 3 4 5  | Next » Last 
Displaying 1-10 of 230 reviews