Books

Request Friendship
Send Request Cancel

HeIsSailing

HeIsSailing

My reading prefrences are: physics, astronomy, history, religions, mythologies, heresies, peculiar beliefs and legends, taboos and forbidden lore.

I am only showing titles that I have started reading after 01 January, 2008. Take a gander at my bookshelf and leave a comment or reading suggestion!! more »
  • El Paso, TX, USA
  • member since February 11 2008

Reviews

  • Sort by:
 
‹ Previous | 1 2 3 4  | Next »
Displaying 21-30 of 38 reviews
  • The Case for Christ
    1 of 1 members found this review helpful.
    • Rated 1 stars

    'The Case for Christ: A Journalist's Personal Investigation of the Evidence for Jesus', by Lee Strobel. Finished reading 15 May 2008. 1/5 stars.

    It is my firm belief that any book which asks the reader in its preface to put away all subjectivity and view both sides of a debate topic equally will immediately plunge headlong into logical fallacies and spin-doctering. Such is the case with Strobel's 'The Case for Christ'. Not that I mind it presenting only one side of an argumement - he is after all making a 'case'. But to pretend this has any objectivity at all makes Strobel's intentions suspect from page 1.

    Strobel, acting as a journalist, interviews a dozen or so leading Evangelical scholars for their evidences for their belief in Jesus Christ. The questions he asks are fine, but in general he never asks the follow-up questions that are just screaming to be asked. One assertion after another is left unchallenged. Bruce Metzger claims there are ] 5000 Greek manuscripts of the New Testament, so the reader is left with the impression that each manuscript is evidence of the reliability of Scripture. But Strobel fails to asks how many of those 5000 are actually useful for determining the actual text. Strobel fails to ask how many centuries have passed between the time of Jesus and the time the vast majority of those manuscripts were written.

    Donald Carson claims that Jesus fit the profile of God revealed in the Old Testament. Strobel should have asked Carson about Marcion, the early church heretic who found no similarity between YHVH and Jesus, and in fact claimed they were two entirely different dieties.

    Craig Blomberg claims that the the disciples of Jesus all died martyrs deaths (John excepted), thus giving their witness to the Resurrection of Jesus added weight. This assertion by Blomberg was left unchallenged by Strobel. Why didn't Strobel ask how we know how any of the disciples died and evidences that we have for their deaths? The reason is that the accounts of their deaths are from legendary sources, some written centuries after the fact.

    Strobel fails to counter any Evangelical claim. I am not asking for counter-arguments by skeptics. Again, I understand that Strobel is making a 'case' and I am fine with only one side presented. I am interested in his opinions. But if Christ has a case to be made, that case should stand up against the stongest argument Strobel can build. Yet Strobel is content with the weakest of arguments, leaving any obvious follow-up challenge unasked. And like any good objective book, the fact that it includes instructions on how to 'receive Jesus into your heart', as sort of an alter-call appendix, leaves Strobel hawking Christianity like a bad Amway product. He is desperate to have me buy his wares for any reason, no matter how flimsy.

    I gave Rob VandeWeghe's dreadful apologetic book 'Prepared to Answer' zero stars, but I am giving Strobel one star because the book was well written and extremely easy to read. Then again, that could also be its curse. This is dumbed down religious propaganda - the only question I now have is who the intended audience for such books is? Does Strobel really think he can win the unbeliever over with this spin like some Evangelical used car salesman? Or is he aiming this toward the Christian who took the religion on faith and wishes for some excuse, any excuse to 'objectively' believe? That is one question I wish I had the answer to.

    HeIsSailing wrote this review Sunday, May 18 2008. ( reply | permalink )
  • The Singularity is Near
    0 of 1 members found this review helpful.
    • Rated 2 stars

    "The Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology", by Ray Kurzweil. Finished reading 24 April 2008. 2/5 stars. The technological and biological world predicted in the next 20-50 years by Kurzweil is, how shall I put it delicately... frightening. Can you imagine a world where humanity will have transcended their own biology to such an extent that they will debate on what it means to even be human? The world presented in this book is that of transhumanism - the future of cyborgs. I suspect that this future may indeed occur sooner or later. Why only two stars then? My distaste for this book comes from Kurweil's creepy fascination and enthusiasm with transhumansism. It is not so much the technology that frightens me, rather it is more Kurzweil's eerie optimism and anticipation that makes the whole thing somewhat creepy for me. As Kurzweil rambles about how he daily ingests *hundreds* of vitamins and suppliments in his premature quest for transhumanism, I cannot help but picture him as I would a pyromaniac who hypnotically stares at a campfire. The book was also in serious need of an editor. It could have easily been 1/4 of its length without losing any content. In all, a somewhat tedious read.

    HeIsSailing wrote this review Saturday, April 26 2008. ( reply | permalink )
  • Gospel Fictions
    • Rated 4 stars

    'Gospel Fictions', by Randel Helms. Finished reading 20 April 2008. 4/5 stars.

    This is the shortest, most direct critique of the Gospels I have ever read. It contains not a single superfluous sentence, in fact seems to begin and end almost in a mid-sentence.

    'Gospel Fictions' is essentially a condensed version of Strauss' monumental 'Life of Jesus Critically Examined'. Both use the same technique of reading the Gospels vertically, that is, reading individual episodes and comparing the differences across each Gospel in which they appear. Comparisons are also made to Old Testament parallels to Gospel episodes, mostly in the stories of Elijah, Elisha, Joseph, the Psalms and prophets, then implications are drawn to the motivations of the individual Gospel authors. Absolutely fascinating!

    My one reservation is that Helms sometimes gives far to much credibility to Morton Smiths, 'Secret Gospel of Mark', which is almost certainly fraudulent, and Bultmann's hypothetical 'Signs Gospel'. Otherwise, this is highly recommended.

    HeIsSailing wrote this review Monday, April 21 2008. ( reply | permalink )
  • Scientists Confront Creationism: Intelligent Design and Beyond
    • Rated 3 stars

    "Scientists Confront Creationism: Intelligent Design and Beyond", edited by Andrew Petto and Laurie Godfrey. Finished reading 19 April 2008. 3/5 stars.

    This book, an anthology of articles mostly by scientists, is an update of the 1983 book "Scientists Confront Creationism". The years since 1983 have seen the rise of the new strategy called "Intelligent Design", which is clearly and repeatedly shown in this book to be nothing more than Biblical Creationism in more politically friendly terms. The updating is thorough, and the distinctions are drawn between 'old-school' creationism (ie Morris, Gish, Ham) and the current ID strategy (Behe, Dembski, Ross).

    Like most anthologies, this one is a mixed-bag. It is very effective at showing Creationism/ID as a pseudo-science, and more a political controversy than a scientific controversy. It is not as effective at presenting evolutionary evidence. The evidence is presented in jargon-laden bites from paleantology and genetics - much like the brilliant college professor whos lectures simply mystify eager students.

    Recommended for the politics, not the science.

    HeIsSailing wrote this review Sunday, April 20 2008. ( reply | permalink )
    • Rated 5 stars

    'The Formation of the Christian Bible', by Hans von Campenhausen. Finished reading 22 Mar 2008. 5/5 stars. This book describes the historical process of the formation of the Christian canon and the motivations of the theologians before ~200 CE who ultimately assembled the Christian Bible. Von Campenhausen is certainly thorough. He first describes the reaction of Christianity to the Jewish 'Law and Prophets' and the crisis which the Old Testament canon brought to newly developing Christian thought. Church fathers like Ireneaus, Polycarp, Turtullian, Clement, Origen, and yes, heretics like Marcion and Celsus, are each detailed with their unique perspectives on books which were later accepted (or rejected) for canonicity. The descriptions of how these men defined the limits of the canon are particularly fascinating. This is the best book on early Christian history I think I have ever read. Scholarly, extensively footnoted, full of interesting details, yet I found this very easy to read - in fact a compelling page turner. I finished all 333 pages of text, including many of the footnotes, in two long sittings. I highly recommend this book, with the warning that it is not for beginners. Some familiarity with early Catholic theologians is helpful, and a working knowledge of Scriptures on the fringe of the canon (Shepard of Hermas, Epistle of Barnabas, 2 Peter, etc) is also useful.

    HeIsSailing wrote this review Saturday, March 22 2008. ( reply | permalink )
  • One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich: A Novel
    • Rated 5 stars

    'One Day in the life of Ivan Denisovich', by Alexander Solzhenitsyn. Finished reading 21 Mar 2008. 5/5 stars.

    This novel describes the day's activities of Ivan Denisovich Shukhov and his fellow prisoners in Gang 104 in a Siberian labor camp in 1951. Solzhenitsyn, who was himself confined to such a camp from 1945 - 1957, follows Shukhov's camp life for one day from reveille to lights-out. The measure and influence of this book, first published in 1962, is incalculable. It made the world aware of just one of the horrors of the Stalinist regime. An important book, and a reminder that de-humanization still exists in many parts of this world.

    HeIsSailing wrote this review Saturday, March 22 2008. ( reply | permalink )
  • by
    • Rated 3 stars

    'Philippine Folk Tales', by Mable Cook Cole. Finished reading 16 Mar 2008. 3/5 stars

    I have the opinion that one of the best ways to begin understanding an alien culture is to study their myths, fables and legends. This book is a collection of ancient stories, gathered from just a few of the countless number of native tribes that inhabit the Philippine Islands. Some of the myths explain natural phenomena, or local customs. Some of the stories seem to be incomplete or even mere fragments, as they seem to set up a story, then abruptly end with no resolution (ie the Tinguian stories of the Mistaken Gifts, and the Boy who Became a Stone). There are even a few fables which carry wise morals, ala Aesop (The Man with the Coconuts). Some of the tribes have elaborate myths, such as the Igorot stories of the great God Lumawig, or the Tinguian myths of the spirit goddess Aponibolinayen, and her reluctant demigod husband Aponitolau. Despite the wide variety of stories and myths, one thing seems to be common in all of them – magic betel nuts. My favorites were the elaborate myths of Mindanao, which shows obvious influence from Spain, Arabia and India, and the hilarious Tinguian myths. Most of the legends of the Christianized tribes, by contrast, were simple fables with the most skeletal of frameworks.

    The myths are arranged very logically, so that the reader can easily tell similarities between them, and how the different myths must have influenced each other. The footnotes clarify some of the strange customs depicted in some of the stories. I really enjoyed this book. I recommend this book to anyone interested in mythology, or Philippine culture.

    HeIsSailing wrote this review Sunday, March 16 2008. ( reply | permalink )
  • Mayflower: A Story of Courage, Community, and War
    1 of 1 members found this review helpful.
    • Rated 2 stars

    'Mayflower: A Story of Courage, Community, and War', by Nathaniel Philbrick. Finished reading 13 March 2008. 2/5 stars

    Why oh why did I find this book, about one of the most fascinating times in American history, to be so dreadfully boring? I think it is the narrative style that the author brings to this historical account. There is not a single footnote in the text, so the style is aimed at being fast paced. Yet this narrative, almost story-telling style demands that the characters are presenting in an interesting fasion - which they are not. Each historical character has no development, so they just become names on a page, blended together into a single non-personal character. To me, this is fine in a scholarly book, but not in the light narrative of this book.

    But then again, I found Noth's commentary on Exodus to be a gripping page-turner, so what does that tell you about my sorry opinion of what is interesting?

    HeIsSailing wrote this review Friday, March 14 2008. ( reply | permalink )
  • God's Problem: How the Bible Fails to Answer Our Most Important Question--Why We Suffer
    0 of 1 members found this review helpful.
    • Rated 2 stars

    'God's Problem: How the Bible Fails to Answer Our Most Important Question--Why We Suffer', by Bart D. Ehrman. Finished reading 11 Mar 2008. 3/5 stars.

    Regarding human suffering, Ehrman writes: "This book is not really meant to explain just what we should be doing [about suffering]...This book is designed to help us thnk, not about the solution, but about the problem. And the problem I'm addressing is the question of why. Why - at the deep, thoughtful level - is there such pain and misery in the world? I'm not asking the scientific question of why mosquitoes and parasites attack the human body and make it ill, but the theological and religious question of how we can explain the suffering in the world if the Bible is right and a good and loving God is in charge." (p. 200)

    That is a better synopsis of the book than one I could come up with. I have mixed feeling about this book. It is certainly Ehrman's most personal and emotional to date. Yet I can't help but wait for something new from Ehrman that is on par his earlier, and truly magnificent book, "The Orthodox Corruption of Scripture". What can I say - Ehrman spoiled me with that one.

    HeIsSailing wrote this review Tuesday, March 11 2008. ( reply | permalink )
  • Exodus: A Commentary

    by Martin Noth
    • Rated 4 stars

    'Exodus: A Commentary', by Martin Noth. Finished reading 8 March 2008.

    4/5 stars. Noth's commentary does a remarkable job of explaining, or at least attempting to explain, some of the cultic practices and beliefs of the ancient authors of the book of Exodus. There are so many bizarre episodes in Exodus, that Noth rightly must make inferences from neighboring religious practices to understand the proper meaning and context. As a result, Noth skims over beliefs that have been lost to time, like the second '10 commandments' of Exodus 34, or The Lord's attempted assassination of Moses in Exodus 4. The style of the book is scholarly but lucid. While the book reprints the RSV version of Exodus, and distinquises through different fonts J and E from P, J and E are not differentiated. I found this a bit confusing. Overall though, an enjoyable read.

    I admit, Biblical books like Exodus are certainly not for everyone, particularly the last 20 chapters, but I enjoy them for what they are - peeks into our distant past - our heratige, and where we ultimately came from. Even though I don't read ancient wisdom books like the Bible in any devotional or religious sense, I think there is still a great deal to be learned from them.

    HeIsSailing wrote this review Sunday, March 9 2008. ( reply | permalink )
‹ Previous | 1 2 3 4  | Next »
Displaying 21-30 of 38 reviews

Missing a review?