Books
Group avatar

Reading Green

Do you wonder how you can reduce the amount of waste you put in your garbage can? Do you know what a carbon footprint is, or how to make yours smaller? Do you like to read and learn about how to live a simpler life based on sustainability? Then join "Reading Green" and share your favorite books and tips on how to live more green.

Keep...more »

« more discussions

  • Keneti

    Carbon Belch Day

    I was a bit stunned by this, but the writer's take home message is something we should all consider...let's not be alarmist, but lets find concrete steps to improving things. Maybe we should also be on the lookout for books that follow the 'Carbon Belch' philosophy and warn our friends and relatives about the fallacy of this approach.

    http://news.cnet.com/8301-11128_3-9957787-54.html
    June 3, 2008 11:28 AM PDT
    'Carbon Belch Day' promotes un-green actions
    Posted by Elsa Wenzel on www.cnet.com
    Smoke cigars, do a partial load of laundry, drink bottled water, and feel no shame. That's what a campaign against a carbon trading bill is urging.

    The latest parody of the proliferation of "green" social-networking sites and eco-friendly events comes via "Carbon Belch Day," a campaign from the conservative Grassfire.org alliance that encourages people to pollute as much as possible on June 12.


    This carbon calculator encourages ecologically uncouth behavior.

    So far, more than 140,000 people have signed a petition against "climate alarmism," according to Ron De Jong, spokesman for Grassfire.org. If the effort attracts half a million people, it would lead to the release of 105 million pounds of carbon a week from this Thursday.

    The effort is strong on shock value, yet weak on social networking and Web 2.0 tools, other than its "belch" calculator. There are no real-world events planned, so expect no sea of SUVs clogging freeways, other than the usual weekday bottlenecks.

    The point, instead, is a political campaign to get people to oppose the Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act, which would establish a corporate carbon cap-and-trade system, but is already threatened by a promised White House veto.

    "Somehow, this bogus idea of environmental indulgences has become accepted as a real and valid way to deal with our carbon guilt," De Jong wrote in an e-mail.

    Other popular Grassfire petitions include "Secure our borders" and "Save marriage." Group founder Steve Elliott holds a master's degree in public policy from Regent University, founded by televangelist Pat Robertson, which counts many graduates in prominent government positions in Washington, D.C.

    The campaign may be a crude attention-getting ploy to which I can be accused of pandering. But its effort seems doomed, swimming against the mainstream tide. Conventional wisdom has shifted to embrace global warming as a near scientific certainty, and, like it or not, popular culture celebrates all things "green."

    Even if Lieberman-Warner flops, many experts in the clean-tech sector anticipate a boost as carbon markets expand in the United States, perhaps following the European model, especially as a new administration takes the helm in Washington. Attendees of clean-technology conferences regularly mention the coming carbon markets with the same certainty used to describe melting ice caps.

    As carbon trading scales up, however, the next challenge will come as the public grapples with an abstract subject and demands accountability. Personal carbon footprint calculators and offsetting services are hard enough to navigate.

    And motivation aside, the "belch" campaign shares a point with which many environmentalists would agree: that promoting fear of climate change could be counterproductive.

    Remember the tagline of Al Gore's An Inconvenient Truth? It was supposed to be "The most terrifying movie you'll ever see." A Time magazine cover last spring warned, "Be Afraid, Be Very Afraid."

    Apocalyptic headlines and images of drowning polar bears sell, but they make people less motivated to "green" their daily habits, according to Michael Shellenberger, author and co-founder of the progressive Breakthrough Institute.

    A study commissioned in 2000 by CNN founder Ted Turner found that the more people learned of the dire consequences of global warming, the less they felt they could do anything about it.

    "And people were more likely to say they would buy an SUV to help them through the erratic weather to come rather than support increased CAFE standards," Shellenberger noted at a conference earlier in May.


    Keneti started this discussion 1 year ago. ( reply )

8

replies
expand replies 
Sign in to participate in this discussion.
  • Sharon Fawcett 

    The article states: "A study commissioned in 2000 by CNN founder Ted Turner found that the more people learned of the dire consequences of global warming, the less they felt they could do anything about it." Seems to me a lot of people are trying to do something about it. This week several General Motors closed four pickup truck and sport utility vehicle factories, announced a new small car that could get 72 kilometres per gallon and cut 10,000 jobs in the process. Apparently SUVs and trucks aren't selling anymore and they may stop making the Hummer. I suspect this has more to do with the high cost of fuel than an altruistic desire to save the planet, but switching to fuel efficient vehicles is still a step in the right direction for decreasing carbon emissions.

    In Canada you can't go a day without hearing some story in the media about people "going green." I think folks like the ones who are promoting Carbon Belch Day should be sent to a smoggy, deforested, toxic island and left there for a couple of decades with a few Hummers, herds of cattle to eat all their grain, polluted waterways, and a coal fired generating plant or two and see how they like it. Or, they could move to Beijing.
    posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
  • Katydid

    Katydid (edited)

    I just don't understand how people have missed the connection between conserving energy and more money in their own pocket! Not only does running partial loads of laundry pollute, but it costs me extra cash, too! Maybe the greening of society and these tough economic times will go hand in hand.
    posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    show 8 replies
    • Cathy B

      Cathy B 

      I have related feelings about people who drive at more than 55mph. Until you are driving more carefully I don't want to hear you whining about the cost of gas.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • Sharon Fawcett 

      I'll second that Cathy. My kids hate driving with me because I go sooooo slow (they say). I try to drive 5 km/hour below the speed limit. Apparently we're supposed to drive 10km/h over the limit--so everyone tells me. Grrrrrr.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • jabberwocky

      jabberwocky 

      Sharon- after joining the group last night, i read your post about keeping it 5km below the speed limit. As i was heading to work today, i was thinking about that. I stared at my rpm's the whole way. As i was getting coming down off a big bridge, there was a car (three cars ahead of me) that Slammed into the bridge....then proceeded to Slam into the other side of the bridge...then back to the first side. ( he hit the walls of the bridge three times before spininng out!) I was afraid he was going to go over the side of the bridge it was that BAD!!

      He was driving way too fast on slippery conditions. Not to mention the carload of kids he had in his back seat. The Truck behind him narrowly escaped hitting him...but the car infront of me hit the Truck instead. I was behind her....driving safe.....

      long story short NO one was Hurt THANK GOD!
      but had i been driving like i usually do....i may have been in that wreck too. so thank you and Thank you Cathy b for your post.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • jabberwocky removed this reply 1 year ago.
    • jabberwocky removed this reply 1 year ago.
    • Cathy B

      Cathy B 

      Oh my!!!
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • Sharon Fawcett 

      WOW!! I am sorry to hear about the accident but so glad you escaped being part of it. Yes, driving slower does give us more time to react when something like that happens.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • Jacks

      Jacks 

      I'm glad to hear everyone was okay, too. Driving safely has more than one benefit!
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
  • To reply to this discussion, please sign in or join now.

Return to top