I just finished it, and I thought it was ok and odd. I laughed out loud in a couple parts, and I liked the handling of the jock/donkey.
I think there were too many characters for a book that size, and I'm with you, by the time I figured out who was who, the book ended.
I think the style "hippiness" was supposed to lead one to think of the universality of the adolescent experience, and the unidetifiability (?) of the speaker at times points to that common experience, too. It doesn't matter who is speaking when, because sooner or later everyone thinks it or says it-- so maybe the blurred edges between characters was part of that goal as well. Maybe?
posted 5 years ago. ( permalink )