Books
Group avatar

Suspense and Thrillers

If you love thrillers, come join us!

Future Group Reads:

March: The Keepsake, by Tess Gerristen
April: Blood Memory, by Greg Iles
May: The Mermaid's Singing, by Val McDermid

NOTE: If you are an author of a mystery, suspense/thriller book and would like to lead a group discussion in a group read of your...more »
  • Category: Genres | Shelfari | Started August 2007

« more discussions

  • May 15th Group Read: ALL THE PRETTY GIRLS by J. T. Ellison

    ****Warning****Spoilers Below*****Warning****

    Members of the Suspense & Thrillers group, please give a warm welcome to J. T. Ellison who has agreed to lead us in a group discussion of ALL THE PRETTY GIRLS.

    Before getting started, I want to post a review by Ron Wynn at NashvilleCityPaper.com.

    Although Nashville is the site where all the action occurs in J.T. Ellison's strong mystery novel All The Pretty Girls, the style, tone, careful thematic development and character interaction share many things with works set in other cities.

    Ellison's book not only introduces several intriguing, complicated and quirky personalities, but also has the attention to detail, unexpected twists and puzzles that are vital to topflight crime fiction.

    The extra bonus for local readers is her knowledge of Music City, and the conflicts that are interspersed throughout the book between the traditional and the contemporary, the established order and the emerging new communities, and the impact of growth and increasing urbanization on a place that once fancied itself a small town rather than an large metropolis.

    Homicide Lieutenant Taylor Jackson represents both the new breed of police officer and the modern Southern woman. Though she lives in Belle Meade and was a debutante, Jackson isn't anyone's demure type. She had to deal with cynicism and prejudice while working her way up the ladder, and she's become familiar with departmental politics and the misguided views of old-timers reluctant to accept change. Jackson's good at dogged investigation and at playing hunches, but isn't reckless or overconfident.

    Away from the job, she can be both aggressive and playful, Jackson also isn't intimidated by anyone or anything, and doesn't let the ugliness of her chosen profession affect her personality and life.

    She's currently involved in a romance with FBI profiler Dr. John Baldwin, and the two find that business and pleasure are intersecting when they become part of a joint investigation seeking the identity of the Southern Strangler. This individual isn't some charming rogue or folkie anti-hero. Instead, it's a brutal killer who leaves a souvenir at each crime scene, the prior victim's severed hand.

    The couple soon finds their steps being dogged by an ambitious television reporter Whitney Connolly, the embodiment of many things that are wrong with 21st century media.

    Connolly is overly ambitious, ethically challenged and anxious to escape an environment she considers beneath her. She acquires some information that could break the case, only she lacks the knowledge to understand what she has or the good sense to share it with the people who could utilize it properly.

    As the joker in the deck, Connolly threatens to not only derail the investigation, but also become another victim of the Southern Strangler.

    Besides including some spicy dialog and entertaining scenarios and situations, Ellison's portrait of Nashville and its residents is on the mark.

    This isn't a work that casually covers the city. Rather it's a volume that displays her admiration for its residents, love and knowledge of its special characteristics, and the desire to communicate those to others.

    As the first of a planned three-volume series, All The Pretty Girls not only provides a stirring welcome for Taylor Jackson and her comrades, but sets the table for future adventures.


    J. T. Ellison will be posting discussion questions below. If readers have their own questions about the book, please feel to ask below as well.
    deactivated member started this discussion 1 year ago. ( reply )

188

replies
expand replies 
Sign in to participate in this discussion.
  • J.T. E

    J.T. E (edited)

    It's great to be here! Thanks so much to all of you for having me, and to J. Kaye for asking. Once you're done, please take a trip over to my website (www.jtellison.com) and sign up for my newsletter. I'm going to do a drawing at the end of the month for an ARC (Advanced Readers Copy) of my new book, 14, coming in September 2008.

    So let's get to it. I'll jump in with the first question:

    Why do you think I titled the book ALL THE PRETTY GIRLS? How does the title shape the tone of the book?
    posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    show 11 replies
    • rowanthea

      rowanthea 

      The title intrigued me. After reading the book I thought it was a perfect title.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • deactivated member 

      Oh yeah - I'm going to your site now. I should already be a subscriber, but I'd rather double check...you know, better safe than sorry. :)

      About the question: For me, it was the title, the text and the book cover combo that set the perfect tone for the story.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • normnmiles

      normnmiles 

      I liked the title kinda fit the Stranglers preferences for his victims.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • jenlaw77

      jenlaw77 

      I'll agree with J. Kaye. The title and text on the cover drew me into the book.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • J.T. E

      J.T. E 

      One of the members in my critique group HATES the title. It drives her nuts, for some reason. I actually pulled it from two sources -- that old nursery song -- "Mary, Mary quite contrary.... how does your garden grow? With silver bells, and cockle shells, and pretty maids, all in a row." And the Grimm Brothers Jorinda and Jorindel -- Jorinda was "prettier than all the pretty girls..."
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • Readingrat

      Readingrat 

      I'm not finished with the book yet, but my daughter just asked me the same thing today. I'll have to tell her your answer.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • deactivated member 

      Hates the title? Really? I thought it was appropriate. But when you add the how it was scratched out on the cover, the hand and a blood red background, it’s magic! The whole package was perfectly put together.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • BeckyL

      BeckyL 

      I like the title. The whole cover is very eye-catching.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • Colleen S

      Colleen S 

      I thought the title was perfect. THe girls were all pretty, the color and layout of the cover was very eye catching and fitting for the book.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • deactivated member 

      I also thought the cover and title were perfect for the book. Caught my eye and drew me in too.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • BethReadsAlot

      BethReadsAlot (edited)

      Because all the girls are attractive? I am not done reading it yet.

      BTW, I purchased the book before I found out there was a group read. The cover caught my eye and I read the synopsis and bought it.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
  • J.T. E

    J.T. E 

    Do you see homicide Lieutenant Taylor Jackson as a hero? Why or why not?
    posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    show 12 replies
    • rowanthea

      rowanthea 

      No. She was a dedicated investigator.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • deactivated member 

      Hmmmm…hero…I didn’t think of her that way when I was reading the story. I’m not sure why not. Maybe it’s my perception of a hero is one without flaws. Stupid, I know. But that’s my fairytale image of a hero.

      Good question.

      In reality, all police officers, good ones, who risk their lives are heroes, aren’t they? People who put their life on the line to save others.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • rowanthea

      rowanthea 

      What J.Kaye said.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • normnmiles

      normnmiles 

      No, her character didn't come across as the hero type to me. Like others I just think she is dedicated and rather gifted at her job.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • jenlaw77

      jenlaw77 

      I agree with everyone else :). I don't really see her as a hero, but she's certainly a dedicated police officer.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • J.T. E

      J.T. E 

      Then let me ask this. Do you see Jack Reacher as a hero? Or an iconic character?
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • deactivated member 

      Noooo…lol…Jack Reacher is definitely not hero material, at least in my book. He’s a hunky, bad ass, rebel. Compared to Taylor Jackson, who tries to follow the rules, she’s a role model. I’d have to kill Jack Reacher if he got near my daughter. (lol) That said, I wouldn’t mind playing around with him…he’s hot!
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • BeckyL

      BeckyL 

      I think Taylor is certainly heroic. In this day and age, she could be considered a hero.

      Reacher is totally a hero! He has plenty of flaws which certainly makes him different from traditional heroes, but I would still consider him a hero and an iconic character of the 21st century. I think our present perceptions of heroes has altered, and will continue to, with our changing times. For me Reacher fits the mold of what I believe a modern hero is.

      It would be interesting to see if age has anything to do with the answer to this question. I am undoubtedly part of today's "desensitized" youth (even though I feel older every day!) and have no doubt that my opinion would be different from my mother's.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • Colleen S

      Colleen S 

      I didn't think of her as a hero while reading the book but I guess I do consider anyone who puts their life on the line to be a hero (police officers, firefighters, military). So by that definition she's a hero.

      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • J.T. E

      J.T. E 

      I've always thought it would be fun to have Taylor cross paths with Reacher. Baldwin might have a run for his money, at least in the short term.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • deactivated member 

      I didn't see her as a "hero" either. I don't read the books with Jack Reacher, so I can't compare. I agree, she was a very gifted, dedicated officer. I enjoy the Alex Cross series, but I don't see him as a hero either.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • BethReadsAlot

      BethReadsAlot 

      No I didn't this she was a hero.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
  • J.T. E

    J.T. E 

    What is the underlying message of the book?
    posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    show 5 replies
    • deactivated member 

      For whatever good intensions, a secret was buried or at least that’s what the family tired to do. Unfortunately, too many knew of the secret for it to remain quiet. If Quinn had stood up and done what she believed was the best thing, which was to tell Reese the truth, maybe none of this would have happened.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • Colleen S

      Colleen S 

      Even though it's ugly, the truth shouldn't be hidden. I do have to wonder though, there are other children of rape out there--what made Reese turn out the way he did? Was it just the "secret" being kept from him, something hereditary in his background, some difference in the way he was raised (were the parents less affectionate because he wasn't truly "theirs" and a child of rape to boot)? Those were the things that floated through my mind.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • J.T. E

      J.T. E 

      Colleen, that's an excellent question. It goes to the nature versus nurture argument, as well as culpability -- if these guys are driven by something more than their OWN desires. It's such a fun question that I decided to tackle it in a separate book, and the research has been fascinating. I think for our justice system to stand up, we must believe that these killers and rapist CHOOSE their paths. If they aren't emotionally or psychologically responsible, the entire system collapses, and there's no punishment because there is no personal responsibility. We all know the difference between good and evil, right and wrong. They must too.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • Colleen S

      Colleen S 

      I've always been fascinated by the nature vs. nuture thing as well. I look forward to reading the book that you tackle this in. It's always been interesting to me, how different people who've gone through the same experiences react to it.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • deactivated member 

      Agree with above.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
  • J.T. E

    J.T. E 

    What is Taylor afraid of? Why?
    posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    show 7 replies
    • rowanthea

      rowanthea 

      Well spiders of one. I would have to say failure.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • deactivated member 

      Ditto - she feels a need to prove herself. She doesn’t like for her fellow cops to see her vulnerable side. She’s only close to what - a couple of people? There’s Sam, but I don’t know how close she is to Baldwin. I mean, she didn’t know how to tell him she was pregnant, even though that didn’t exactly turn out to be correct. (The mix up made me laugh.)

      So I agree with rowanthea. It’s failure, oh and spiders…lol!
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • Jody Porter

      Jody Porter 

      Definitely spiders. God, I hate spiders too. That scene sent shivers....

      I think she's afraid of change. She's in what she feels to be a perfect situation with Baldwin now, and is afraid of doing something/saying something to mess with that.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • J.T. E

      J.T. E 

      Everyone is right here... she's afraid of failure, and change, and spiders. But that's all -- she's pretty tough about the rest ; )
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • BeckyL

      BeckyL 

      Oh, I'm late with this one! Failure was my answer.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • Colleen S

      Colleen S 

      I'll chime in with failure also, and spiders (I don't like them either), I think maybe she feels the need to be so successful because being a police officer is the farthest thing from her background.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • Readingrat

      Readingrat 

      I also think Taylor is afraid of being seen as weak (or has having a weakness).
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
  • J.T. E

    J.T. E 

    What is the single most significant moment in the story? Why?
    posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    show 5 replies
    • rowanthea

      rowanthea 

      When Grimes shot himself. The downward spiral just got to me.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • deactivated member 

      There was no “single” one thing - no way! There was Whitney's accident and what rowanthea mentioned. I was like Baldwin. Should have seen it coming, but didn’t.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • normnmiles

      normnmiles 

      Like J. Kaye I don't think there was a single moment in the book that was more significant than the others. Though, Whitney's and Grimes deaths were huge surprises to me.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • Jody Porter

      Jody Porter 

      For the sake of plot advancement, the most significant moment of the story came when Taylor and Baldwin made the connection between Whitney and the Souther Strangler through the poems.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • Colleen S

      Colleen S 

      I didn't see a significant moment exactly. There were several things that made the story significant--Whitney's accident, Grime's suicide (sure didn't see that one coming), the connection between the poems and Whitney.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
  • J.T. E

    J.T. E 

    I use variations of the color gray throughout the book. Why do you think gray is so important to the story?
    posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    show 4 replies
    • deactivated member 

      Because no situation is black or white. Too many perceptions involved.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • J.T. E

      J.T. E 

      I like the idea of there being HUGE gray areas into which Taylor will not tread. I explore her resistance to that in the third book, JUDAS KISS.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • Colleen S

      Colleen S 

      Things are never cut and dried, black and white. What's wrong to one (or even most) could be perfectly reasonable and right to another. Gray fits with that changing of perceptions.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • Readingrat removed this reply 1 year ago.
  • J.T. E

    J.T. E 

    Do you feel a connection with the victims of the Southern Strangler? How does the knowing the victim's background, their feelings, their hopes and dreams affect your thoughts of them?
    posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    show 9 replies
    • rowanthea

      rowanthea 

      That was a intresting aspect to the book. You did a great job of catching their personalities in a few paragraphs. Most writers just give the stats, you gave details. Definitely added to the storyline.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • deactivated member 

      At the beginning, we got to know the victims through the eyes of the investigators. Later, the reader got a bit of insight through the victims themselves. I like how this escalated to varying points of view. I think it brought the reader and characters closer together.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • J.T. E

      J.T. E 

      John Connolly wrote in an essay once that he thought it reprehensible (my word) that a prostitute who'd been killed was given no real story in the press. He wanted to make sure that none of his victims were soulless, on-the-page people to be used as a plot device. That stuck in my head, and when I started writing this book, I knew I wanted to give each girl her due.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • rowanthea

      rowanthea 

      Could not agree more.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • BeckyL

      BeckyL 

      I definitely felt a connection in All the Pretty Girls - I remember reading it in an airport and getting chills. It wasn't so long ago that I was in college and could have been a few of these girls.

      I think giving background on the victims can work either way. In certain types of books, I think not knowing lends something different to the overall effect of the story.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • Colleen S

      Colleen S 

      Giving the background made the girls seem more real to me. And the fact that the strangler wasn't concentrating solely on a certain "type"--there was the girl that slept around a lot contrasted with the "good girl" (can't think of her name--the one from UNC). And even the girl who slept around was still a person, knowing their background and thoughts gave more sympathy than a "just the facts" perspective.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • J.T. E

      J.T. E (edited)

      Colleen, I think that's a more realistic representation, too, because women of all moralities and socio-economic backgrounds are murdered every day.

      Becky, I feel like ANY of us could be a target, and wanted to make sure as many of us were represented through the characters as possible.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • deactivated member 

      I agree with the above, and I thought you did a great job making us feel connected to the victims.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • Readingrat

      Readingrat 

      I always like seeing both sides of any story - how the girls see themselves and how other people see them.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
  • J.T. E

    J.T. E 

    Why do you think I chose to have Noelle Pazia die from an asthma attack rather than be killed by the Southern Strangler?
    posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    show 6 replies
    • rowanthea

      rowanthea 

      Out of all of the girls, her kidnapping disturbed me the most. I was actually glad she died from a asthma attack instead of being murdered. She was such a innocent.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • deactivated member 

      I thought for realism. If not for that, why?
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • J.T. E

      J.T. E 

      I haven't talked at length about Noelle before... I couldn't kill her. She was an innocent, but she also shares a name with a friend of mine who committed suicide when we were 14. They were nothing alike -- looks, temperament, biographical details -- but something in that name just made me feel sorry for her. It would have been like killing my Noelle all over again.

      Of course, the question is why did I choose that name? And I can't answer that -- Noelle Pazia named herself.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • rowanthea

      rowanthea 

      I'm so with you JT. I would have been so upset if she had been murdered.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • Colleen S

      Colleen S 

      Noelle was an innocent and I was relieved that she died from an asthma attack (if she had to die because the strangler had her, that was definitely the way to go).
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • deactivated member 

      Interesting tidbit about Noelle. This is when it is great to have the author involved in the discussion!
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
  • J.T. E

    J.T. E 

    Were you surprised by the death of Whitney Connolly?
    posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    show 8 replies
    • rowanthea

      rowanthea 

      Very surprised. Nice twist. It made perfect sense once the rest was revealed.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • deactivated member 

      I loved how her character had been brought in to help the reader find the killer…little did I know that wasn’t her real purpose…lol! Still, I thought it was very clever.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • J.T. E

      J.T. E 

      I'll be honest -- she surprised me with her death. I had a vision of the hood of the car, but I thought she might survive. When I wrote the scene, though, she was DOA. It made me tap dance to find out why.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • Colleen S

      Colleen S 

      Completely surprised--I didn't see it coming at all!
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • Readingrat

      Readingrat 

      Definitely surprised. I originally assumed that Whitney would end up dying in the story but I just assumed the Southern Strangler would be the one killing her. I thought the emails he was sending her were bait. I always like twists that take a story I'm reading away from where I originally thought it was going. Thank you.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • J.T. E

      J.T. E 

      Reading, you're welcome. : )
      Yes, Whitney couldn't go on. Her death is the turning point for everyone.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • deactivated member 

      Yes, clever twist.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • jenlaw77

      jenlaw77 

      I had a feeling that she would be killed somehow. I, like Readingrat, assumed she would be killed by the Southern Strangler. I was completely thrown when she died the way she did!
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
  • J.T. E

    J.T. E 

    Quinn Buckley and Whitney Connolly are two sides of the same coin. Did you see the end coming? What foreshadowed that?
    posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    show 6 replies
    • rowanthea

      rowanthea 

      I did see it coming.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • deactivated member 

      In any good thriller, it can’t be the first obvious choice. I knew the husband (Jake) had to be out, especially when he didn’t have the right color of hair. Reese was the next logical guess, but I didn’t understand why until later…then it made sense.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • Colleen S

      Colleen S 

      I didn't see it coming, but then I can be kinda clueless sometimes. I think a lot of people expect twins to be so much alike but as the mother of twins--that ain't necessarily the case! My girls are total and complete opposites. Although they aren't identical like Whitney and Quinn were. Did what they went through when they were kidnapped contribute to them not being close when they grew up?
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • J.T. E

      J.T. E 

      Colleen, I'm fascinated by twins. I've been researching them extensively lately and have found that twins raised apart are more alike than those raised together. Wild, huh?
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • Colleen S

      Colleen S 

      That is interesting to me as well. My girls are fraternal, they've always been complete opposites in personality and temperaments, so we've worked hard to treat them as two completely separate kids. Sometimes, that seems like more work but really, what works for one discipline-wise doesn't work for the other anyway. For the longest time, they kept flip flopping personalities on me but now they've pretty much settled into who I think they're going to be--much to my dismay! :o) The younger of the two is exactly like I was at that age but probably more so, as she's got a good dose of her dad's stubborness in her. So we tangle a lot. But I've been reminded that this too, shall pass. It does blow my mind, those stories that come out about twins that were raised separately being so much alike.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • rowanthea

      rowanthea 

      Coleen couldn't agree more. My girls are identical in looks only. Rowan is conservative and Thea is a flower child. I know Thea is asleep when there is silence in the house. Rowan is bold, Thea is shy. Rowan consumes books, Thea has a very scienctific mind. They are both extremely artistic. Rowan has her own comic strip, Thea is more into bright colors and geometric designs. I have always STRESSED the fact to other people that they are two unique individuals so don't call them 'the twins'. They have names please use them.

      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
  • J.T. E

    J.T. E 

    Keeping in mind that this book is a thriller rather than a mystery, when did you figure out who the villain was? Do you think it's important for me to conceal his identity, or do you like having an idea of who it may be?
    posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    show 8 replies
    • rowanthea

      rowanthea 

      Both work for me. Sometimes I like to know sometimes I like to be surprised. It depends on how the storyline is revealed. Yours worked just right.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • deactivated member 

      Me too, both work. It just needs to be a well put together story and remain interesting from beginning to end. ALL THE PRETTY GIRLS was just that for me. I love how you painted us southern folks. Had me giggling every now and then.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • J.T. E

      J.T. E 

      I'm always surprised when people tell me they thought they knew who did it and were surprised -- this is a thriller, so I wasn't purposefully obscuring the killer -- especially using the first person POV for him. Do you like hearing from the killer's mind in these books?
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • normnmiles

      normnmiles 

      "Do you like hearing from the killer's mind in these books?"
      Very much so!!! The opening of your book had me very excited as I love to get into the mind of the killers throughout the book and get a sense of what they are feeling. However, I was disappointed because it wasn't until the middle of the book when we were able peek into the mind of the killer again.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • rowanthea

      rowanthea 

      I'm with Norm. I find the criminal mind fasinating.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • Colleen S

      Colleen S 

      I don't usually want to know right from the start who the villain is, but I also don't like it when it's someone completely out of the blue. I think this worked for me--I never seriously thought it was Jake but I could see how the set-up was occuring and it made sense. Then when you backtracked the connections--I figured out it was Reese and then I wanted to know why.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • deactivated member 

      I like to be surprised. I love getting into the killer's mind. I think it adds to the thrill of the read.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • Readingrat

      Readingrat 

      For me, you tipped your hand on page 251. Up until then I was willing to accept Jake as the killer, but when Noelle saw him and thought, "He was certainly to young and too handsome to be anything but" (a student at the university). I knew it had to be Reese. In general, I prefer not knowing who the villain is (as I said above, I do enjoy plot twists).
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
  • J.T. E

    J.T. E 

    Why does Taylor avoid marriage?
    posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    show 4 replies
    • deactivated member 

      I think it’s because she is afraid of failure, exposing too much of her human side. Her work has set rules and she works well in those guidelines. Love and relationships aren’t that easy. I do think she’s getting there. She did say yes. :)
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • J.T. E

      J.T. E 

      I abstain from answering this on the grounds I may give something away.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • deactivated member 

      I have to giggle at this. I'd rather wait. :) There was enough in the book to make me want to read the next one and that's what you want. I look forward to "14". That's the title, right?
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • Colleen S

      Colleen S 

      She doesn't want to mess with the way things are--they're going well, why change it?
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
  • J.T. E

    J.T. E 

    How would Taylor be different in a profession surrounded by other women instead of working in a traditionally male world? Do you think she works too hard to prove herself?
    posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    show 5 replies
    • rowanthea

      rowanthea 

      She would still be the boss. She's a natural leader.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • deactivated member 

      Yes, I do think she works too hard to prove herself, but feel as rowanthea does. That's just who she is. Wouldn't matter what job she was in or who her coworkers are. She'd still be the same way.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • normnmiles

      normnmiles 

      I think she would be as successful unless her parents approved of the profession. I believe a lot of her inner drive comes from the fact that she her chosen profession is not approved by her parents. She works extra and strives to be the best in hopes of gaining approval from others and ultimately her parents.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • J.T. E

      J.T. E 

      Norm, right. She's always striving for that approval she will never get, and eventually, she learns how to adapt to that, and work to satisfy herself, rather than win approval from her parents.

      And she is a natural leader, I think she'd rise to the top in any situation. Which is why I like to play with forcing her down : )
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • Readingrat

      Readingrat 

      I think she probably would have a harder time working with mostly female co-workers. Taylor strikes me as a woman who relates to men better than she relates to women.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
  • J.T. E

    J.T. E 

    How does ALL THE PRETTY GIRLS differ from other serial killer novels that you've read?
    posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    show 7 replies
    • rowanthea

      rowanthea 

      We got to know the victims before they died. There was more then one storyline. It read very smoothly.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • deactivated member 

      I don’t feel I have read enough thrillers to give an overall opinion. What stood out for me is how real this story felt. It was like Law & Order without the courtroom. It’s like you wrote from the experience of a police investigator.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • normnmiles

      normnmiles 

      For me it was having two detective type characters with different cases. I haven't read many thrillers where the main character wasn't completely involved with the case from beginning to end. I think of the Strangler case as mainly Baldwin's and Taylor more of the local help.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • J.T. E

      J.T. E 

      J. Kaye -- I was shooting for that. I wanted it to read like an episode of Law & Order. Nice catch!

      About the dual storylines... I know it's impossible to do in a book, but the reality of police work is they have forty odd cases open at any one time. I wanted to show that they don't just drop everything to work on this one big case, there's always something else out there.

      Oh, and Nashville Metro just arrested the real Rainman, the Wooded Rapist.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • Colleen S

      Colleen S 

      At first the two separate storylines distracted me--I kept wanting to get back to the strangler but like you said, the reality is that investigators don't just work one case at a time...Even though I was temporarily distracted by the storylines they did go together smoothly and I liked the way it was written.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • J.T. E

      J.T. E 

      I've been surprised by how many people commented on the dual story lines -- is that not the norm? I've always been drawn to intricately plotted books with more than one direction -- like John Sandford's PREY series, and really wanted to present a more realistic view of how police work -- they can have 40 open cases that they're working at any given time. So it seemed like a natural thing for the story, totally organic.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • BeckyL

      BeckyL 

      I really enjoyed the dual story line, I haven't come across many that are written quite that way. Sure you get different points of view, but for at least part of the book the two are working separate cases and that was different for me - effective and, again, enjoyable.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
  • J.T. E

    J.T. E 

    How does Taylor's background affect her view of crime? Do you think she would be as relevant if she had a tortured background instead of a privileged upbringing?
    posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    show 4 replies
    • rowanthea

      rowanthea 

      I don't think it would have made a difference. She is a stongwilled, determined woman who knows who she is. That just comes from living life.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • deactivated member 

      No - I feel as rowanthea does on this one.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • J.T. E

      J.T. E 

      I was careful with that. I didn't want her to be driven by demons to do the job. I wanted her to be driven because that's who she is.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • Colleen S

      Colleen S 

      I have to agree with rowanthea and J. Kaye. I don't think it made any difference at all, and even though she had a privileged upbringing, she didn't seem all that comfortable around Quinn.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
  • J.T. E

    J.T. E 

    Is Dr. John Baldwin's character too good to be true? Why is he the man Taylor actually falls in love with?
    posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    show 4 replies
    • rowanthea

      rowanthea 

      Ahhhhhh. He was pretty normal to me. He also knows who he is and has no problem showing it.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • deactivated member 

      I wonder if that’s how Taylor feels, that he’s too perfect. As the reader, I didn’t think so. I don’t see him as perfect. He works too many hours, gone all the time. Only someone in her (or his) job would understand. I think they are perfect for each other though.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • J.T. E

      J.T. E 

      It's always hard to find your intellectual and moral equal. Their relationship is fascinating to me -- them finding each other was vital for her growth as a character, and for his. More on THAT in later books : )
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • Colleen S

      Colleen S 

      I didn't find him too good to be true, he did have plenty of flaws. And I think Taylor falls in love with him because they are well suited to each other, in temperament and background.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
  • J.T. E

    J.T. E 

    Where do you think the series is going? Will Taylor Jackson and John Baldwin ever marry? Do you want them to?
    posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    show 6 replies
    • rowanthea

      rowanthea 

      Well, I'm not a romance girl. So thank you for writing about a grown up, real relationship. Married or not, doesn't matter to me, they seem committed. Curious to see how the relationship will develop with Baldwin in Nashville permanently.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • deactivated member 

      Watch I be wrong on this one. Yes, I think they are going to get married, but something bad is going to happen. He’s going to die isn’t he? No, don’t tell me. I don’t wanna know. I’ll read about it in the next book.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • rowanthea

      rowanthea 

      LOL you crack me up J.Kaye
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • J.T. E

      J.T. E 

      Ro, thank you for that. I didn't want her hopping into bed with him every five seconds, it would be out of character and also derail the thriller parts of the story. Though there's a little more sex later on...
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • rowanthea

      rowanthea 

      Bring on the sex.....
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • Colleen S

      Colleen S 

      It doesn't matter to me if they get married or not. I don't think they need to be married to be committed to each other and I think the marriage part could mess up the storyline anyway...I'll echo rowan on this--I'm glad it was a real relationship and that they had conversations and interactions that didn't all have an underlying sexual undertone.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
  • J.T. E

    J.T. E 

    Why does Taylor call John Baldwin "Baldwin" even when they are alone together?
    posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    show 7 replies
    • rowanthea

      rowanthea 

      It seems right that she calls him Baldwin. In the male dominated field she works in it's a normal accurance.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • deactivated member 

      I thought it was out of habit. But maybe it's to keep a certain distance between them. Hmmm...good question.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • normnmiles

      normnmiles 

      I feel it's a continuation of her need to keep a professional distance while at work. I also feel that she is afraid of commitment and is her way of staying detached from him personally.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • Colleen S

      Colleen S 

      Never thought about it but it could be a holdover from work. My husband goes by his last name even when he's with friends--I've never called him that but then, I don't work with him.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • J.T. E

      J.T. E 

      I asked this because several reviewers commented on it as well -- I know several people who call their husbands by their last name, and maybe it's a southern thing. And with the whole cop thing, it's natural. But wait until she actually calls him John!!!
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • Readingrat

      Readingrat 

      I think of it as more of a nickname. I think people get in the habit of calling a person a certain name - just ask anyone who has decided to change from being called a nickname to being called their given name. lol
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • ahenry262

      ahenry262 

      I think Taylor wants to keep it professional, and still be one of the "guys".
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
  • J.T. E

    J.T. E 

    Nashville is a character in this book. How is the city different from what's normally portrayed on television and movies?
    posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    show 2 replies
    • deactivated member 

      On television, it’s made to look touristy and commercialized. And though the city is a tourist hotspot, the book focused more on police, investigating, and sprinkled the story with colorful, lifelike characters.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • Colleen S

      Colleen S 

      What J. Kaye said...
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
  • J.T. E

    J.T. E 

    I did extensive research with the Metro Nashville Police to build a background in forensics and police work. Do you think this realism lends itself to the story? Do you care whether the facts are pinpoint accurate, or are you more concerned with the story?
    posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    show 6 replies
    • rowanthea

      rowanthea 

      I live for the little details. That's part of what keeps me intrested.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • deactivated member 

      LOL @ "I live for the little details."

      I agree, but I do want to point out these weren’t boring details. I have seen authors go overboard and practically drowned out the story. I think it’s an art to blending real details, all the while keeping the story moving forward at an interesting pace. This book was well done in that area.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • J.T. E

      J.T. E 

      Great! I'll keep that in mind : )
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • Colleen S

      Colleen S 

      The details are good but I think you did a great job in that they didn't overshadow what was going on.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • deactivated member 

      I also like the details as long as they don't overshadow the story. I think you had the right mix.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • Readingrat

      Readingrat 

      Inaccurate facts make or break the story for me. I always appreciate when an author has taken the time to research the things they are writing about.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
  • J.T. E

    J.T. E 

    Who is your favorite secondary character?
    posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    show 6 replies
    • rowanthea

      rowanthea 

      I really enjoyed the secondary characters, but if I have to pick one, it would be Fitz.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • deactivated member 

      Oh cracker jacks, you did have to ask that question. It might have been easier to ask which I didn't like. Hmmm...I can't narrow it down to one, but I loved the Lincoln & Marcus duo.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • rowanthea

      rowanthea 

      Me too J.Kaye
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • J.T. E

      J.T. E 

      I like Fitz too -- he's such the father-figure for Taylor. I like Sam as well, she's someone I want to delve into more.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • rowanthea

      rowanthea 

      Sam was my kind of best friend. I kinda looked at her more as a main character. Please delve away. : )
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • Colleen S

      Colleen S 

      I can't narrow it down to one--Fitz because of the father-figure aspect, Lincoln and Marcus because I just thought they worked well together and wouldn't mind finding out more about their personal lives, and Sam just because she's the "best friend" and I'd love to know how motherhood changes how she looks at her career. So more delving would be great!
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
  • J.T. E

    J.T. E 

    Taylor is an exceptionally controlled individual. What would it take to push her over the edge? How would you feel if that happened?
    posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    show 9 replies
    • rowanthea

      rowanthea 

      Yes she's controlled but she is also focused. I think if someone in her inner circle was threatened it could push her over the edge, like a mama bear protecting her cubs.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • deactivated member 

      I think if she wasn't able to do her job. That would push her over.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • deactivated member 

      Oh, part II of the question, I wouldn't like it.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • normnmiles

      normnmiles 

      I agree with rowanthea. If someone in her inner circle was threatened she would be ruthless in tracking them down.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • J.T. E

      J.T. E 

      I like that, a mama bear protecting her cubs. Very apropos.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • rowanthea

      rowanthea 

      LOL....... my southern was hanging out.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • Colleen S

      Colleen S 

      If there was a threat to Sam or Baldwin--she'd be pushed over the edge. Not sure I'd like it--but life is messy so I hope you don't kill them off although I'm sure it's bound to happen sooner or later.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • Readingrat

      Readingrat 

      Oh... being in a situation like the spider scene from Raiders of the Lost Ark comes to mind as something that would definitely put her over the edge - don't you think? :)
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • ahenry262

      ahenry262 

      I think if her boss took her off a case, it would really push her over the edge. She loves her job and she enjoys solving crimes and to a small extent, being in the spotlight.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
  • J.T. E

    J.T. E 

    Would this book make a good movie? How would the screenplay work best?
    posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    show 6 replies
    • deactivated member 

      Oh heck yeah! All good thrillers make the best movies.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • J.T. E

      J.T. E (edited)

      I would love to see this on the screen, simply because I would like to see Nashville portrayed as it really is. Who could you see playing Taylor and Baldwin?
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • rowanthea

      rowanthea 

      I think it would make a excellent movie. The only problem I see is the dual storylines. I want both in the movie.
      Just so it's not all the usual suspects. Tired of seeing the same actors over and over and over.............
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • Colleen S

      Colleen S 

      Movie, definitely...Not sure if you could do the competing storylines justice in a movie though.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • J.T. E

      J.T. E 

      I imagine a script might combine the two story lines -- making Reese the killer and the rapist. I actually had a draft where that was the case, but it was too much -- I liked him being responsible for the murders only and evolving that way.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • rowanthea

      rowanthea 

      JT wouldn't want him to be both.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
  • J.T. E

    J.T. E 

    Taylor has a job, responsibilities, and a team to manage. When the Southern Strangler moves through Nashville, she is forced to stay in the city to work her job instead of following Baldwin out onto the road. Does this help or hurt her character?
    posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    show 5 replies
    • rowanthea

      rowanthea 

      I'll just shout it out. If Taylor had left her responsibilties and her team to trot after Baldwin like a subservient little woman, I would have been pissed. She has way too much integrity.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • deactivated member 

      Agreed. It wasn't in her character/personality to follow Baldwin.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • J.T. E

      J.T. E 

      Ro, thank you! That's it exactly. She can't just run off -- and I hate it when authors do that with their characters. It's not how the real world works.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • rowanthea

      rowanthea (edited)

      Thank you Thank you.....Finally a writer that lives in the real world.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • Colleen S

      Colleen S 

      It helped--she couldn't just trot off to help solve crimes in other cities! Life just doesn't work that way and besides Nashville is her town.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
  • J.T. E

    J.T. E 

    And last, but certainly not least...
    Were there loose ends that you wanted to see tied-up? If so, what were they?
    posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    show 8 replies
    • rowanthea

      rowanthea 

      First I have to say, I really enjoyed the multiple storyline. It could have very easily become a jummbled mess, but you did excellent job of balancing it out. The only thing I felt you left dangling was Judge Hamilton, Terrence Norton and the possibility of corruption.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • deactivated member 

      rowanthea - I actually forgot about that! Gosh, you have such a great memory...lol!
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • normnmiles

      normnmiles 

      I agree with rowanthea on this one as well. Dont' feel bad J. Kaye it didn't occur to me either.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • J.T. E

      J.T. E 

      There may be some resolution to that upcoming...

      Do you ever have a problem with an ending that's ambiguous? I don't mean not solve the crime, but when is it okay to leave other loose threads out there?
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • rowanthea

      rowanthea 

      No because I knew there was a sequel. I liked the D.A. and the fact that it introduced Lincoln & Marcus. It wasn't a major storyline so no big.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • Colleen S

      Colleen S 

      There were loose ends with the judge and that Norton character. But I just figured that it would be worked out in an upcoming book!
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • deactivated member 

      As long as there's an ending, I don't mind loose ends...especially when I know book II is coming.

      Where I have a problem is when you read a book, make it all the way to the end and wondering "What?" Some readers LOVE this, I don't. ALL THE PRETTY GIRLS did have an ending, one that made sense, so the loose ends were fine and I'll be expecting to learn more with the next book.
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • deactivated member 

      Ditto!
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
  • ahenry262

    ahenry262 

    I am typing this with one eye closed....I have 100 pages to go and then I'm jumping in this discussion! Woo hoo!!
    posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    show 3 replies
    • deactivated member 

      LOL @ you typing with one eye closed!
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • ahenry262

      ahenry262 

      I know but I have to finish this without spoilers!! Then I have to find a way to speed read The Dollmaker and the Greg Olsen book for June. Whew!! I should't have any problems though - I can't put down a good thriller. :-)
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
    • ahenry262

      ahenry262 

      This book was really good. It annoyed me sooo much every time I got interrupted or had to put it down. Looking forward to the sequel!
      posted 1 year ago. ( reply )
  • To reply to this discussion, please sign in or join now.

Return to top