Books
Group avatar

fiction effect

This group generally attracts those interested in writers and writing somewhat outside the mainstream, writing that experiments with the language and/or does not shy away from difficult topics/truths. We have a keen interest in discussing current trends in narrative, exploring works from some of the hottest small presses (and the big ones, too,...more »
  • Category: General | Started July 2007

« more discussions

  • mmolino54

    Black Hole by Charles Burns

    Save Changes Cancel
    Black Hole has received its share of accolades, so I was a bit worried that it had no choice other than to disappoint me. I was wrong. Burns weaves a trippy tale about a set of high school students that suffer from a shared "sickness"--it is primarily transmitted sexually and those who suffer from it find themselves developing various types of body mutations (one of the main characters has a miniature mouth on his neck that speaks on its own often kind of channeling his subconscious; another character has a tail). No two mutations are the same and all of them seem to function as a kind of personal and social manifestation of being a teenage outcast.

    From a strictly visual standpoint, it's one of the darkest inked black & white pieces I've seen, which gives the entire story a kind of noire feel. Burns does a masterful job of creating a sense of anxiety and suppressed dread throughout the entire book as he weaves in and out of the tales of three or four main characters. Set in the 70s, there is this feeling of post-hippie ennui, as if every teenager is engaged in drinking and drugs, but no longer sure why... kind of caught between eras.

    For those who have read this (which I hope is more than just fellow admin Jamie and I), I'm curious as to how others reacted to this book. Specifically, was this book different from the graphic novel format you're used to? In what ways? How did you see the text and visuals working together or against one another? What did you make of the title?
    mmolino54 started this discussion 2 years ago. ( reply | permalink )

3

replies
expand replies 
Sign in to participate in this discussion.
  • Jamie
    Save Changes Cancel

    Having only read Watchmen--and now Black Hole--my experience with graphic novels is narrow and my opinion of the genre unripe. I thought the illustrations in the book were fantastic; I’ve never seen such ingenious imagination solely executed in black and white. But I think my issue with graphic novels lies in the fact that drawings are incapable of conveying a story to me as effectively as mere words (which is precisely how I feel about movies as they relate to books), so I often feel a lack of depth with the characters (or I did with those in Black Hole and Watchmen), who simply cannot express themselves as fully through the illustrations as they might have with more narration. Therefore, upon completing Black Hole, I felt that it was too far-fetched for me to love--not far-fetched in the sci-fi aspect of a physical metamorphosis-rendering STD that is rampant among these teens, but in the fact that the characters did not feel real and rather seemed more like teenage stereotypes. It is likely that I simply do not find books of the graphic novel genre compelling; I was never a comic book kid, being a girl and all. And being a parent, I am always baffled by the absence of parental governing in books like these…I hate how teens are often depicted as adults gone wild with little influence from those who truly matter most to them; it perpetuates the belief that parents have little place in the lives of teens, who are competent at making life-changing decisions all on their own. Yet, I did like the book and will probably read it again…

    To me the title seemed to represent the trend of the drug-consumption and “post-hippie ennui” you mentioned, Marc, as well as the actual STD--a downward vortex of despair that is almost inescapable for these teens, drawing them in and effecting an unknown alteration, although there is probably more to it than that.

    posted 2 years ago. ( permalink )
    show 1 reply
    • mmolino54
      Save Changes Cancel

      I think that's probably a strength & a weakness of the genre: the visuals add a kind of natural pre-language interpretation to the story but it also locks one into a definitive visual interpretation of things (the way characters look, how they appear, etc.) without as much internal insight and context to the narrative. What really struck me about the visuals for this story were those pages in which he split the panels between characters and mirrored both their appearance and story, so that it was as if they had changed place with one another. The blurring of the lines of both story and character, I guess is what I'm trying to say. I do get a kick out of the small visual markets that delineate things (in this case, the panels with straight lines being the current narrative/voice vs. the panels with wavy-lined borders being either recollection or dream sequences). I feel like the reader's mind has to animate the story in a graphic novel, as if you take the visuals and the text and set them in true motion. I think certain authors facilitate this better than others and I thought Burns handled this very well. But I did grow up reading comics and have always been a bit of a fan. Not everyone warms to the format.

      Hmmm... not sure what to make about your take on the parenting issue. From my own personal experience, my parents would have been disturbed/alarmed/reactive if I didn't come home any one night, but I could be out well past midnight w/out them having any notion of what I was doing or where I was (although I normally gave them some info about the latter).

      What did you make of the mutations themselves? Did you see them as random or related to the characters individually? I don't think any adult is aware of them in this book ever, are they? Or, at least, I don't recall any of them acknowledging it in any form. It was akin to teenage life being literally a kind of foreign affair, an other worldly kind of experience. The sex in this book is very odd, too, in that it's mostly a pretty emotional affair between the characters and not casual or one-nightish. It's like the very thing that allows them to connect or ground them, engulfs them and makes them sick. There certainly seemed to be a lot of anatomically-suggestive illustrations and mutations (mouth-vagina-skin-incisions as a kind of unavoidable, uncontrollable black hole).

      posted 2 years ago. ( permalink )
  • Jamie
    Save Changes Cancel

    Yes, I was pretty ttaken with those mirrored images as well, and with the images that were sliced and rearranged in creative ways. I've never seen anything like it before.

    I don’t think it’s the format, per say, that troubled me. My eyes can handle bouncing around the bubbles, reading in all caps, and the illustrations definitely promoted the story. I can’t explain it really--with graphic novels or picture books I feel as though I’m walking down hallways lined with windows, and no matter how many turns I make or how differently the windows are arranged, I can still only just peek through to what lies on the other side; when I have more to work with, as I do when there is ample and good narration, I am able to climb through the window and actually enter the world the author creates. (Perhaps this is symptomatic of real life, in which I have always detested being confined indoors.) After all, a picture can only capture a moment in time, a fraction of a second, whereas words, when read, tend to collaborate in my mind and form much more than images, although I admit pictures can also form more than images in one’s mind, which I guess is what you were saying. What it really comes down to is my intention when reading fiction, which is to be pulled into the story and to identify with the characters in some way that affects me, but with Black Hole I could not be pulled in, no matter how much I admired the artwork. And then it is a matter of taste--I am not a visual person. It's funny because I think I would have liked the book a lot more if it had been just drawings. :op

    As for the lack of parenting in the book, that was just a gripe and didn’t lower my estimation of the book in any way. I did wonder how such a contagious, palpable disease could go unnoticed by the adults in the book, but then again the adults were rarely mentioned at all. The disease was totally underground, a hint at the underground world of these teens and perhaps teens in general.

    I like the two opening illustrations leading up to the illustration of the dissected frog--first a slit, then a gaping incision--which upon first glance reminded me of a vagina, a foreshadowing of the sexual content, no doubt--but also that warns of the grotesqueness and unnaturalness to come when the disease will slice into the bodies and lives of the teens. I didn’t really see the mutations as having a connection with the individuals who sprouted them; they seemed fairly random to me. What about you? I found it interesting how the disease was able to take control in affected teens and subliminally attract a specific unaffected teen as a means of spreading itself and contaminating others, as seen when Chris is suddenly and inexplicably drawn to Rob and when the main character (what’s his name? I’m drawing a blank) is drawn to Eliza. Somehow with these couples the disease leads to the evolvement of full-blown romances, like they’re soul mates or something--kind of cheesy, especially for teens.

    posted 2 years ago. ( permalink )
  • To reply to this discussion, please sign in.

Return to top