Growing up, I never had a lot of taboos placed on sex. While I do exercise a diligent discretion for the sensibilities of others, when I'm reading alone I have no need of these filters. I guess this is why my friend's comment surprised me so much.
I only saw F. Herbert's sexual themes as an exploration into one of the many aspects of life and humanity; a theme as common place to life and humanity as food, water, breathing, etc. I believe he approached these themes with a style either intended to treat sex as a natural, common place part of humanity, or that such a treatment of the themes came out organically. Perhaps, if I ever get around to reading his biography, it may shed some light on this.
I found his style and tone to be consistent while moving into and out of sexual themes. He maintained the same voice. This served to create a casual, matter-of-fact tone on the subject of sex. Now, I'll admit I did grow up with some taboos about sex, which is probably why I found some of the sex scenes a little titillating, as the casual, matter-of-fact tone would introduce details suddenly without building up to them much. I think my titillation was mainly derived from the cautious discretion I exercise out of respect for other people's sensibilities. But also because I found casual, comfortable discussion of sex refreshing.
This raises an interesting idea. I, with fewer taboos, see one thing in the novels. My friend, perhaps with more taboos, sees another thing in the novels. This is a good scenario for examining the role the reader/receiver/observer plays in the creation of art-- the co-creation of meaning. So, perhaps equally valid arguments could be made for both sides of this whole discussion. If meaning and reality are subjective then both perspectives would be true.
On that note, as I do believe the role of the receiver is undervalued, I won't disagree with any view that the sexual themes were digressions and distractions. But that is contrary to my experience with the books. To me, the sexual themes were explorations into another aspect of humanity and into future human potential.
posted 2 years ago. ( reply )