Okay, so I just downloaded an audiobook: O. J. Is Innocent and I Can Prove It more because I was interested in the controversy rather than believing the premise (by hey, I'll try to keep an open mind). As the title suggests it is a *new* investigation of the O.J. Simpson case, and supposedly suggests a new perpetrator (we shall see...). Also I recently bought the audiobook of A Wilderness of Error by Erroll Morris, which is about the Jeffrey MacDonald case (see Fatal Vision). The Morris book actually led me to review my conviction that MacDonald was guilty (as I was about 80% convinced) which is a big turn around. I was wondering if you guys have any examples of books (especially recent ones) that have made you question or revise old cases?
A. R. Muir started this discussion 3 months ago. ( | permalink )