Books
Group avatar

Science Fiction

Science fiction includes such a wide range of themes and sub-genres that it is notoriously difficult to define. This is a list of definitions that have been offered by authors, editors, critics and fans over the years since science fiction became clearly separate from other genres. Definitions of related terms such as "science fantasy",...more »
  • Category: Genres | Started February 2007

« more discussions

  • Rob U

    Slow or Fast Start for a Book?

    Save Changes Cancel

    Personally I prefer a slow start to any sci-fi book that I'm reading. I'm thinking of books like Dune, Rendezvous with Rama, Foundation, stuff that builds character first.

    It just makes the action when we get to it, all the more meaningful. It's one reason why I find fault with a lot of the current sci-fi out there at present. They seem to be written like Hollywood sci-fi action movies, with a huge action set-piece in the beginning, kind of like writing by numbers. It's fun and entertaining on some level I suppose, but because you're not really acquainted with the character involved in the action, it ultimately means absolutely nothing to me at the outset.

    What do you prefer? Slow or Fast start to the book you're reading?

    Rob U started this discussion 4 months ago (edited). ( reply | permalink )

14

replies
expand replies 
Sign in to participate in this discussion.
  • Thomas Watson
    Save Changes Cancel

    Although my own writing (so far) starts out on the slow side and builds up, I don't find I have a preference for one over the other while reading. When handled properly, a fast start can lead into an enjoyable read. For me, generally, if a book starts out at a fast clip and ultimately lets me down, it wasn't the pace at the beginning that caused a problem.

    posted 4 months ago. ( permalink )
  • ScoLgo
    Save Changes Cancel

    I've read and enjoyed both types. Since you mentioned Dune, when I first attempted that particular book, I gave up because nothing grabbed my attention. Of course, I was in 7th grade at the time so did not have the patience that I do now. When I came back to it a couple of years later and forced myself past the first 100 pages or so, I became really, really invested and ended up loving the book.

    Perhaps the bulk of current sci-fi is geared toward 'action-ey' hollywood-style plots because the authors are hoping to have the movie rights picked up by tinseltown? It's nice getting paid, I suppose...

    posted 4 months ago. ( permalink )
  • Mark W. Tiedemann
    Save Changes Cancel

    Depends on the story being told. If it's an action/adventure, speed is often of the utmost importance. If it is, in fact, a novel of character, slow is a very personal judgment. It also depends on the particular style of the author. Gene Wolfe, for instance, no matter what he writes, does not have an approach amenable to a breakneck pace, as opposed to, say, Neal Stephenson. Last year I read Leviathan Wakes, which hits the ground running, and doesn't slow down foir almost 600 pages. Perfect. I also read Leigh Brackett's The Long Tomorrow. Completely different story, requiring a more studied approach. There is no one-size-fits-all.

    posted 4 months ago. ( permalink )
    show 1 reply
    • ScoLgo
      Save Changes Cancel

      I recently read 'The Long Tomorrow' as well. Great book. More 'tension' than 'action' in that one IMO.

      posted 4 months ago. ( permalink )
  • Kevin H
    Save Changes Cancel

    Sometimes it depends on the author. If it's someone I've read before, and I know what to expect, then I'm willing to wait for the long build up. The last two novels I read, Brothers to Earth and Lord of Light, both started slow but I was rewarded with an excellent read for my patience. Between 50-100 pages is usually my limit, if I'm not interested by that point I will put the book back down to read later, or not at all.

    posted 4 months ago. ( permalink )
    show 3 replies
    • dustydigger
      Save Changes Cancel

      Thats similar to me.I never did get through Neal Stephenson's Snow Crash.Nothing had happened after 200 pages,so I gave up.But I do tend to like a bit of action in my tales.Long philosophical discussions etc bore me silly and sometimes painstaking overdetailed world building does too.If I want to read a book about adaptation to living in a hot desert world,I am as happy with a fun romp like Harry Harrison's Planet of the Damned as the inordinate length of Dune. Yeah yeah,Dusty and her shoot em ups.No hope for her ;0)

      posted 4 months ago. ( permalink )
    • ScoLgo
      Save Changes Cancel

      It's all right Dusty. There are no rules that say you must enjoy any particular style of story-telling.

      I do recommend that you stay far, far away from Stephenson's Anathem! I liked that book (a lot!) but there is a dearth of action for the first oh, 500 pages or so. Hahaha.

      posted 4 months ago. ( permalink )
    • dustydigger
      Save Changes Cancel

      Yep,Scolgo,I saw it on the library shelf,and beat a hasty retreat.It needed a wheelbarrow to cart it home.Not for me thanks! ;)

      posted 4 months ago. ( permalink )
  • nina d

    nina d (edited)

    Save Changes Cancel

    Something needs to grab my attention in the first 15-20 pages.
    In Snowcrash, mentioned above, the beginning starts with a ninja pizza deliverman for the mob who
    may be killed because the pizza may be a few minutes late. Funny and attention getting. Others
    may be slower to start but something of interest must start pulling me in. I love great characters,
    so as long as they are building an interesting cast, I'm in. A good example is Lonesome Dove. The
    beginning is slow and they are just going through their daily routine, but the writing was great, the
    characters memorable, and the situations often humorous. Years ago I finished every book
    that I started, but now I'm may throw in the towel by page 50 if the author can't pull me in.

    posted 3 months ago. ( permalink )
    show 2 replies
    • Shakatany
      Save Changes Cancel

      "Years ago I finished every book that I started, but now I'm may throw in the towel by page 50 if the author can't pull me in." Me too. I came to realize life's too short to read boring books (unless one needs to do so for school or a job).

      posted 3 months ago. ( permalink )
    • nina d
      Save Changes Cancel

      Shakatany...:D...and still at this rate I won't be able to finish reading all the books I want.

      posted 3 months ago. ( permalink )
  • Thomas Watson
    Save Changes Cancel

    Pace for the beginning of a book can present a real quandry for authors. To say attention spans t'ain't what they used to be would be an understatement, but also a not entirely accurate generalization. So, do you stay true to the story as it evolved developed in the writing? Or do you "enhance" the opening pages in the hope that you might set the hook in an audience that's used to things blowing up in the first five minutes of the movie? Can you trust that enough people will trust you as an author (especially if you're new to them) that your style of story telling will develop a following, as is?

    Only one way to find the answer, and that's one of the scary bits about writing a book.

    posted 3 months ago. ( permalink )
  • Richard
    Save Changes Cancel
    It does not have to have a fast beginning for me but it does need to grip me in some way. Boring beginnings will almost always turn me off to a book.
    posted 3 months ago. ( permalink )
  • C.E. Martin
    Save Changes Cancel

    I like a slow build- setting up a mystery or problem first, then establishing the characters then unleashing the action

    posted 2 months ago. ( permalink )
  • To reply to this discussion, please sign in.

Return to top