Books

Request Friendship
Send Request Cancel

Britt

Britt

  • Beloit, WI, USA
  • member since January 2 2007

Reviews

  • Sort by:
 
1 2  | Next »
Displaying 1-10 of 14 reviews
  • The Prism and the Pendulum: The Ten Most Beautiful Experiments in Science
    • Rated 4 stars

    The most beautiful experiments in science are all physics and astronomy experiments! Coincidence? I think not! :)

    As a physicist, I enjoyed the book very much, though I can't comment on how accessible it would be to the layman. This book would make a great basis for an undergraduate course for physics majors or for non-majors, as many of the experiments could be easily reproduced in the classroom, and they raise a lot of important issues about the nature of science, of experiment, and of reality.

    I was most fascinated by the chapter on Millikan's Oil Drop experiment. I performed this experiment as an undergraduate physics major, nearly going blind from squinting at dim little globules of light, throwing my back out of whack for a week because I had to hunch over to see through the awkwardly-positioned microscope, and getting lousy results—I think I found the mass of the electron to be 2.5 times the actual value. More interesting than the description of the experiment itself is [it]The Prism and the Pendulum's[/it] discussion of how Millikan selected and represented his data. Is it ethical to discard data that you feel are clearly out of line due to faults in your instrument or your experimental setup? Sure. Is it okay to do so without making mention of it in your paper? I don't think so. Is it okay to discard data and then claim that you used all the data you collected in order to avoid criticism by rival camps? Not by my standards, though Crease defends Millikan's choice to do just that.

    Definitely a good read for someone interested in physics or the process of science.

    Britt wrote this review Wednesday, August 13 2008. ( reply | permalink )
  • The Courage to Teach : Exploring the Inner Landscape of a Teacher's Life
    • Rated 4 stars

    Palmer is a little bit gushy about the great ineffable glory and torment of being a teacher, and I found myself skimming vast swaths of the book. However, I did find several important points to that I am trying to integrate into my thinking about teaching.

    One is a frank acknowledgment that teaching is scary, that we can be so desperate to be liked by our students and to get them to learn that we can lose track of our own identities. We should not become over-invested in technique. Not every technique is right for every teacher. This flies in the face of evidence-based teaching in physics—but while pre- and post- testing with large groups can prove certain techniques that should be successful for most teachers, this ignores the unique things that we can do that work well for me and my students that may or may not work for anyone else. As teachers, we can embrace the techniques that reinforce our integrity, and not be worried about the rest.

    Another important idea that I took away from the book is the "subject-centered" classroom, in contrast to the teacher-centered or student-centered classroom. I really like the idea of all of us approaching the subject together, with the instructor, not a source of knowledge or an ultimate authority, nor a sometimes distant "guide on the side", but an active participant who serves to model our approach to knowledge in our field.

    This book is widely recommended amongst academics who care about teaching, and I will probably recommend it to others, though I personally am more practical-minded and probably got a lot more out of Advice for New Faculty Members by Robert Boice.

    Britt wrote this review Tuesday, July 22 2008. ( reply | permalink )
  • The Geography of Thought
    • Rated 4 stars

    An easy and fun read, at least for me, this book served its authors stated purpose in causing readers (both Eastern and Western) to think about their biases and habits of thought, and consider other ways of thinking about cause and effect, relationships, and the world in general. Nisbett's thesis is that Easterners tend to think in terms of a holistic whole, and about many influences, while Westerners tend to think of isolated objects and simple cause/effect relationships. The point isn't that one approach is better than the other; in fact, Nisbett describes many experiments, by himself and others, that show that both ways of thinking have their strengths and weaknesses.

    Britt wrote this review Tuesday, January 22 2008. ( reply | permalink )
  • Beggars in Spain (Beggars Trilogy (Paperback))
    • Rated 4 stars

    Beggars in Spain is one of the key SF works on genetic engineering, tackling some of the difficult questions of how society will deal with a class of genetically-superior "Haves" while the overwhelming majority of humanity remain unenhanced "Have-Nots."

    A genetic enhancement that eliminates the need to sleep has the unexpected side effect of greater intelligence and immortality. The story is told from the point of view of the Leisha Camden, who, despite her best efforts, is unable to heal the rifts that form between her fellow Sleepless and the rest of society, the Sleepers.

    Is the fear, anger, mistrust, and violence that springs up between the Sleepers and the Sleepless inevitable? What does it mean to be human? Sleeper and Sleepless must both wrestle with the meaning and interpretation of the phrase "all men are created equal" if democracy will survive. What do the superior owe to society? What does society owe to the strong? To the weak?

    These questions are then raised to the next level when the Sleepless find their supremacy challenged by their own success in engineering Superbright children.

    Britt wrote this review Monday, December 10 2007. ( reply | permalink )
  • Geodesica: Ascent
    • Rated 3 stars

    A very solid space adventure, with characters who are three-dimensional and have interesting relationships.

    I only really have two complaints about the book. One is its breezy treatment of a post-Singularity world, including AIs, nanotech, transhumanism, a human society with no privacy to speak of, and any number of ideas which on their own could generate an entire novel, but whose ramifications are sorely underdeveloped in Geodesica. It reminds me of a complaint one of my professors had about science fiction, which is that scifi written in the 50's is about 50's people with gadgets, scifi written in the 60's is about 60's people, with gadgets, etc.

    The second irritation is that this book apparently just the first half of a two-volume series, which always honks me off. I feel like editors should have to label their books "WARNING: This book does not contain a complete story. Don't pick it up unless you're willing to read X more books." Which probably would have stopped me from buying the paperback from ShopKo for $2.50, so I suppose it's obvious why they don't.

    So, anyway, now I have to hunt down Geodesica: Descent, or else convince myself that Geodesica: Ascent wasn't actually good enough to warrant the additional effort.

    Britt wrote this review Monday, December 10 2007. ( reply | permalink )
  • The Speed of Dark
    • Rated 4 stars

    The parts of Speed of Dark told from Lou's point of view are fascinating, which is why I'm still giving the book 4 stars. What is normal and what isn't? Is "normal" the best thing we can be? Can we change who we are? How much can we change before we can become a different person? These are just some of the probing questions raised in this novel.

    When the story is told by the "normal" characters, however, their characterizations are embarrassingly simplistic and flat. Equally embarrassing is in-jokey SCAdian subplot.

    I guess that Lou's unusual voice serves to mask a very unsophisticated writing style.

    I haven't read the rest of Moon's work just because the subject matter isn't particularly interesting to me and none of my friends have recommended any of her books. If the "normal" parts of Speed of Dark is any indication, that's no surprise.

    Nonetheless, I do recommend Speed of Dark for the character of Lou, and for the fascinating questions he raises.

    Britt wrote this review Tuesday, October 16 2007. ( reply | permalink )
  • Advice for New Faculty Members
    • Rated 4 stars

    This book has a lot of really excellent advice to help any new faculty member survive their first years on the job. Working in "brief regular sessions" is a fantastic and non-intuitive idea and I urge anyone who's feeling overwhelmed with their work, in teaching, research, or writing, to give it a try.

    However, for a book that is subtitled "Nihil Nimus," meaning "nothing in excess," this book sure is wordy and repetitive. It also dwells far too much on convincing the reader that the advice works, rather than just getting on with it and giving some practical advice.

    Actually, I notice that trend in several different sources of information aimed at younger faculty. Huh. Maybe that's just what academics is about... always justifying what you're doing instead of just getting on with it.

    Anyway, this book is a recommended skim (not necessarily a recommended read) for any new college professor.

    Britt wrote this review Monday, May 14 2007. ( reply | permalink )
  • To Your Scattered Bodies Go
    • Rated 2 stars

    I'm reading my way through all the Hugo Best Novel Winners. They're not all great, and for me, this is one of the duds. Too much telling, not enough showing. Bland, workmanlike prose. I probably would have enjoyed it more if I'd read it in high school. I was a lot more tolerant of mediocre writing back then, and I'd be a lot more impress because OMG they r nekkid LOL! Maybe the rest of the Riverworld stuff is better... one can only hope.

    Britt wrote this review Monday, May 14 2007. ( reply | permalink )
  • Molecular Gastronomy: Exploring the Science of Flavor (Arts and Traditions of the Table: Perspectives on Culinary History)
    • Rated 2 stars

    I was disappointed by this book. I read an article about Hervé This in Discover Magazine, and the short artlce had much more interesting, practical information than the entire book. The book just skims the surface, in general.

    Britt wrote this review Thursday, June 28 2007. ( reply | permalink )
  • Mindless Eating
    • Rated 5 stars

    This might be marketed like a diet book, but Mindless Eating is really about the scientific method.

    In one anecdote after another, food scientists and nutrition researchers who are intellectually keenly aware of the mistake we makes about food fall again and again for environmental cues, perceptual errors and psychological tricks that make them eat more than they think they are eating.

    These phenomena are explored in beautifully designed experiments that quantify the caloric difference between having a candy dish on your desk or in your drawer, having your chicken-wing bones cleared away or left on your plate, and accompanying dinner with a wine that you perceive as cheap or pricey.

    The message of the book is that it is not enough to KNOW that we eat more from a larger plate than a smaller one, or that we will eat more M&Ms when they are a variety of colors than when they are all the same color. Forewarned is not forearmed. Even being aware of these effects, you will still fall into the trap of overeating.

    The bad news is that the food industry is well aware of many of these effects, and they are actively out to trick you into buying (and eating) more than you need. Also, innumerable little habits are lurking undetected in your lifestyle, causing you to eat extra calories.

    The good news is that we can outsmart ourselves. There are many ways to trick ourselves into a healthier diet. An excellent example is that we tend to pour ourselves more to drink when we have a short, wide glass than a tall, skinny glass. You can exploit this cognitive trait in two ways. 1) Choose a set of tall, thin glasses to use for juice, soda, or alcohol. Without any conscious effort, you'll pour a little less than you normally would, and cut out some unnecessary calories. 2) Choose a set of short, wide glasses that are only for drinking water or other calorie-free beverages. You'll unconsciously pour more, and be better hydrated.

    These tricks can operate in what Wansink calls "the mindless margin," the deficit of around 100 calories a day that you won't even notice but which will, over the long haul, add up to significant weight loss. What appeals to me is that this isn't a diet where you eat differently, lose weight, then go back to your old way of eating and gain it all back. The book offers many small, painless changes to your lifestyle that will help cut out a few calories a day.

    The kicker is that those calories aren't making you happy or satisfied. They're just creeping into your life through your own mindless habits and the tricks of food manufacturers, advertisers, and sellers. You're not going to drop weight at the same rate as when you go on diet and actively deny yourself calories, but you are going to be able to make lasting changes that will not make you feel deprived, but will help you maintain a healthier weight for a lifetime.

    That's the theory, anyway. Wansink's [ a href="http://www.mindlesseating.org/challenge.htm"]Mindless Eating Challenge[/a] website can help you incorporate 3 new habits into your life each month. This month, my weight has definitely stopped creeping upward. I'm not seeing any dramatic loss (maybe 2 pounds), but I'm hoping to lose the weight slowly, and I'm confident that I will be able keep it off because I'm making permanent, sustainable changes to my lifestyle.

    Britt wrote this review Saturday, May 5 2007. ( reply | permalink )
1 2  | Next »
Displaying 1-10 of 14 reviews

Missing a review?