“Thanks to heidegger, weDare to put life to testI draw water and fireto rekindle deep lovefor rilke in the east:Our true face never speaksin language of dualitythick masks of nihilismengulf the new ageIn fear of colored otherssuppressing sacred voicesthe asssembly of puppetsdisguising renaissanceTame and ridethe tiger of timejulius evola warned usor we will be eatenNo one lives his lifewhen he missed thesecret of yin and yangin oneness of the Real”
“i find this book very hard to understand, yet i have got this idea of how it should be read. you have to realize he takes off from the ground that when reflecting on reality, one is always reflecting on 'our reality', a reality we humans share with eachother, at least to a certain respect. this is why he uses his own vocabulary, to prevent distortion from ojectivication. reality, as percieved, is in the eye of the beholder, so in order to reflect on it you should use your perception and you dont have to take a stance from "outside". while this vocabulary might make the book confusing at first glance, it actually opens up the opportunity to enter into his point of view and follow his thoughts from there. im not sure if this is helpfull or even correct, but i suspect a rereading with this in mind might point you in the right direction. see for yourself. ”
“Can anyone explain to me the problem that this book is supposed to be solving?Or explain to me why that is not an appropriate way to be looking at it?”