Readers

Groups

  • Psychology Discussion Group
  • A Cigar Can Be A Cigar... Or A Cigar, You Know What I Mean? Discussion Group

Other Reviews

Amazon Reviews (4)
 

Most Helpful Reviews

Liked It

donatella c
  • Rated 5 stars

Freud, with the interpretation of dreams applied to his patients, is come to see them in the presence of sexual desires dating back to childhood. Through analysis of their dreams, rebuilding its past removed and the resistance against it, he has also come to discover that there are already in childhood want to have their parents object, a mythical representation of this date is by the events of Oedipus, the protagonist of some tragedies by Sophocles, that without realizing it marries his...

donatella c’s full review »
more reviews »

Didn’t Like It

catalytic
  • Rated 1 stars

Freud was an idot. His early essays are interesting, but by the time I got to his dream interpretation stuff, I thought what the hell, modern pyschology is built on his foundations? Is he serious about his dabbling in the anthropology of taboos? Is he just making shit up as he goes along? Probably. Read it to gain a bit of insight into western "civilization" but don't look for insights into the "soul".

catalytic’s full review »
more reviews »
Community:
  • Rated 3.809524 stars
Amazon:
  • Rated 4.1 stars
 

Newest Comments

  • donatella c

    donatella c said:

    excellent basis for detailed study and then evolved in the time! I think that Freud himself would be read by meta! because some theories were still to be developed and deepen

    posted Saturday, July 5 2008
  • donatella c

    donatella c said:

    excellent basis for detailed study and then evolved in the time! I think that Freud himself would be read by meta! because some theories were still to be developed and deepen

    posted Saturday, July 5 2008
  • Ida_Ming_Tao

    ida_ming_tao said:

    I think he had a lot of ideas right concerning developing children, but his sample of women was extremely biased, and we can't forget the views of his time period were really narrow to begin with. Then there were the copious amounts of drugs. When it came to ideas such as the motivations of normal women, he was basically thinking in a vacuum of troubled patients.

    Academics of today have put his ideas on such a pedestal for being a starting point of psychoanalysis that they tend to forget his work is still only prototypical of what we tend to believe as common sense today.

    The problem of Freud is the problem of all great minds which have been doomed to the dreaded terminology of canon. Canonized ideas have been taken away from us and set in glass displays never to be re-thought or inventively inspected again while they sit calcifying and incomplete.

    Some academics are more in love with having a rule set to set them apart than in openly investigating and sharing the wealth of insight.

    And sadder still, some do not believe rules are always prototypical, and delude themselves into thinking there is ever an absolute that will make them unarguably the master of a certain school of thought. Equality is simply inevitable as each new perspective washes up on the shores of the next.

    Turning people off to Freud's ideas in general due to the the rigid loyalties of his supporters is the ultimate tragedy though.

    posted Sunday, August 5 2007
© 2008 Tastemakers, Inc. | Portions of Shelfari.com are Copyright © 1996-2008 Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates. Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy | Copyright Policy