Books

  • Nithy

    nithy said:

    how correct & apt ! esp this " So, I admit that I enjoyed it on a teenage girl level! If you want mindless, goofy fluff - go for it. If you want serious intellectual fiction, this is definitely one to AVOID" i thought it was a basically good plot gone awry. i the style isn't so good either (twilighters may contradict but nevertheless its my view) its cluttered up with conversations that r meaningless nothings. and this isn't one bit my stuff. there is basically no proper sound logical reason why they love each other. if being perfectly beautiful is d reason...rolling eyes

    posted Wednesday, July 23 2008 ( | view 2 replies )
  • Kirsten S

    kirsten s said:

    AMEN.

    posted Wednesday, January 21 2009
  • Melissa M

    melissa m said:

    Nithy, I can't agree more with this part of your statement: "the style isn't so good either (twilighters may contradict but nevertheless its my view) its cluttered up with conversations that r meaningless nothings. and this isn't one bit my stuff. there is basically no proper sound logical reason why they love each other. if being perfectly beautiful is d reason...rolling eyes"

    I liked the second book ok, but Twilight bored me. I have no problems reading "fluff" as it was referred to in an earlier post or YA literature (I'm a high school librarian) but the obsession she had with him got on my nerves. Every time they met or Edward even walked into the room, the author described his looks, his beauty, Bella's attraction. And let me tell you... these two came in contact often. Im like, ok people, we GOT IT.... He's GORGEOUS.... Now, can we spend more time on the plot than repeatedly describing his looks.

    posted Thursday, May 7 2009
Advertisement