Year of Wonders
 

Year of Wonders

by Geraldine Brooks

When an infected bolt of cloth carries plague from London to an isolated village, a housemaid named Anna Frith emerges as an unlikely heroine and healer. Through Anna's eyes we follow the story of the fateful year of 1666, as she and her fellow villagers confront the spread of disease and superstition. As death reaches into every household and villagers turn from prayers to murderous... (read more)

Top tags: historical fictionplaguefictionenglandmedieval (all tags)

 

Member Reviews

  • dickensfan
    2 of 2 members found this review helpful.
    • Rated 2 stars

    This book made me mad. Brooks started off wonderfully with a compelling narrator who chronicles the hardships of living in her tiny, quarantined village during a resurgence of the Plague in 1666. While it's difficult to read about all of the deaths (especially of the young children), it was interesting to see just how Anna, the narrator, and the other villagers were able to persevere in the face of pestilence.

    Once the Plague ends, however, Brooks seems to lose both steam and focus, turning what had the makings of a good (but not fine) novel into nothing more than a bodice-ripper. In the Reader's Guide at the end of the novel, Brooks states that, "The things I decided not to use from the anecdotal accounts passed down over time were those things that would have seemed most like implausible inventions" (page 5, Reader's Guide). And yet, the ending of this novel is completely implausible, flying in the face of all of her careful work in painting Anna and Michael Mompesson's characters.

    If you choose to read this (and there are many reasons to), I'd suggest putting it down once the Plague subsides. My distaste for the ending is swimming in my head like some infectuous Plague seeds.

    dickensfan wrote this review Saturday, April 7 2007. ( reply | permalink )
  • Elizabeth P
    1 of 1 members found this review helpful.
    • Rated 4 stars

    whoa. ultra scary, very vivid. thank goodness for antibacterial soap.

    Elizabeth P wrote this review Wednesday, June 25 2008. ( reply | permalink )
  • Irene Q
    • Rated 0 stars

    This book was recommended to me by a work colleague.
    She warned me that it was a bit 'dark'.
    However, I read it and loved it so much, I have read it again.

    Irene Q wrote this review 11 days ago. ( reply | permalink )
  • Play Book Tag Shelf
    • Rated 4 stars

    ghost of a rose said: Rated: 5 stars

    Highly recommended! A riveting, realistic, and emotionally intense novel about what it was like to live through an epidemic of the Black Death (Bubonic Plague) in 17th century England. Based on the true story of the villagers of Eyam, Derbyshire.

    The odd and intriguing title is derived from a 1667 poem by John Dryden, titled "Annus Mirablis" ("Year of Wonders" in Latin) about the events of 1666, a year which was marked by a Black Death epidemic as well as the Great Fire of London.

    The book came to be written because author Geraldine Brooks was haunted by a visit she had made to Eyam, a place she had discovered quite by accident. The village is known for having voluntarily placed itself under quarantine so as not to spread the plague to other areas. The courage and sacrifice of the people was extraordinary, as was their accurate perception of some of the ways in which the disease can be spread. This is commemorated today in a museum and in an exhibit at the parish church. Brooks says in an afterword that, "The account was so touching and terrible that it took root in my imagination . . . my thoughts often returned to Eyam, and I began to realize that it was this story, above all others, I longed to tell. What would it be like, I wondered, to make such a choice and to find that in consequence, two-thirds of your neighbors were dead within a year? How would faith, relationships, and social order survive?"

    With a background like that, it is no wonder (pun intended!) that the resulting novel is extraordinary. Brooks includes scenes from "a wealth of anecdotes handed down over the years" from the real people who lived through the plague. These consist of such things as: the role of flea-ridden cloth as the possible plague vector; the greedy grave digger who buried a man alive; the prescient cockerel who knew when it was safe to come home.

    The book is scientifically and historically accurate both in the fictional depiction of what was known and/or believed about the disease at the time (including some bizarre superstitions); and (in the Afterword) in terms of what is known about it today. For example, she implies in the story that the plague came to the village by way of contaminated fabric. There is evidence that this is the way that the plague bacterium was transmitted to Europe during the Middle Ages, from its origin in the Orient.

    I like the approach taken by the author in fictionalizing the story. When she uses the real names of real people, she sticks to exactly what is actually known about them. When she adds fictionalized events and details of personality to characters that are based on real people, she changes the names slightly, so that it is clear both that the character is fictional, and who the real person was upon whom that particular character is based. In this way she is able to preserve historical accuracy while adding the fictional depth that makes the story come alive for the reader.

    The ending of the book is rather odd. It appears that the author may have been at a loss as to how to conclude the story. This is understandable - after a tale about events so dramatic as the Plague, anything else would be anticlimactic. And how does an author say, "Then the plague ended and the survivors went on with their lives," in such a way as to make it interesting for the reader? Brooks gets sidetracked into a non-sequitur about the main character's subsequent life as one of the many wives of a Muslim Middle-Eastern physician. This doesn't fit in with the rest of the book, but neither can it detract from the excellence of the rest of the book.

    Don't miss the most interesting Afterword, in which Brooks tells how the book came to be written and gives some information about Bubonic Plague and the organism that causes it. For example, at one point, cats and dogs were believed to be carriers of the disease, and they were killed in large numbers in a desperate attempt to limit the spread of disease. But it actually had the opposite effect - by eliminating what were probably the most important predators of rats that live among human habitations, this would have encouraged the transmission of plague.

    "It was a voice full of light and dark. Light not only as it glimmers, but also as it glares. Dark not only as it brings cold and fear, but also as it gives rest and shade."

    - Geraldine Brooks, in "Year of Wonders"

    Play Book Tag Shelf wrote this review 3 weeks ago. ( reply | permalink )
  • ghost of a rose
    • Rated 5 stars

    Highly recommended! A riveting, realistic, and emotionally intense novel about what it was like to live through an epidemic of the Black Death (Bubonic Plague) in 17th century England. Based on the true story of the villagers of Eyam, Derbyshire.

    The odd and intriguing title is derived from a 1667 poem by John Dryden, titled "Annus Mirablis" ("Year of Wonders" in Latin) about the events of 1666, a year which was marked by a Black Death epidemic as well as the Great Fire of London.

    The book came to be written because author Geraldine Brooks was haunted by a visit she had made to Eyam, a place she had discovered quite by accident. The village is known for having voluntarily placed itself under quarantine so as not to spread the plague to other areas. The courage and sacrifice of the people is extraordinary, as is their accurate perception of some of the ways in which the disease can be spread. This is commemorated today in a museum and in an exhibit at the parish church. Brooks says in an afterword that, "The account was so touching and terrible that it took root in my imagination . . . my thoughts often returned to Eyam, and I began to realize that it was this story, above all others, I longed to tell. What would it be like, I wondered, to make such a choice and to find that in consequence, two-thirds of your neighbors were dead within a year? How would faith, relationships, and social order survive?"

    With a background like that, it is no wonder (pun intended!) that the resulting novel is extraordinary. Brooks includes scenes from "a wealth of anecdotes handed down over the years" from the real people who lived through the plague. These consist of such things as: the role of flea-ridden cloth as the possible plague vector; the greedy grave digger who buried a man alive; the prescient cockerel who knew when it was safe to come home.

    The book is scientifically and historically accurate both in the fictional depiction of what was known and/or believed about the disease at the time (including some bizarre superstitions); and (in the Afterword) in terms of what is known about it today. For example, she implies in the story that the plague came to the village by way of contaminated fabric. There is evidence that this is the way that the plague bacterium was transmitted to Europe during the Middle Ages, from its origin in the Orient.

    I like the approach taken by the author in fictionalizing the story. When she uses the real names of real people, she sticks to exactly what is actually known about them. When she adds fictionalized events and details of personality to characters that are based on real people, she changes the names slightly, so that it is clear both that the character is fictional, and who the real person was upon whom that particular character is based. In this way she is able to preserve historical accuracy while adding the fictional depth that makes the story come alive for the reader.

    The ending of the book is rather odd. It appears that the author may have been at a loss as to how to conclude the story. This is understandable - after a tale about events so dramatic as the Plague, anything else would be anticlimactic. And how does an author say, "Then the plague ended and the survivors went on with their lives," in such a way as to make it interesting for the reader? Brooks gets sidetracked into a non-sequitur about the main character's subsequent life as one of the many wives of a Muslim MIddle-Eastern physician. This doesn't fit in with the rest of the book, but neither can it detract from the excellence of the rest of the book.

    Don't miss the most interesting Afterword, in which Brooks tells how the book came to be written and gives some information about Bubonic Plague and the organism that causes it. For example, at one point, pet cats and dogs were believed to be carriers of the disease, and they were killed in large numbers in a desperate attempt to limit the spread of disease. But it actually had the opposite effect - by eliminating what were probably the most important predators of rats that live among human habitations, this would have encouraged the transmission of plague.

    (308 pages)

    "It was a voice full of light and dark. Light not only as it glimmers, but also as it glares. Dark not only as it brings cold and fear, but also as it gives rest and shade."

    - Geraldine Brooks, in "Year of Wonders"

    ghost of a rose wrote this review 3 weeks ago. ( reply | permalink )
  • Jamie N
    • Rated 4 stars

    I really enjoyed this book, although the ending didn't leave me too satisfied. I didn't like how the pastor turned out to be a jerk. Guess after all the suffering they endured I wanted a happy ending which is not typical for my tastes.

    Jamie N wrote this review Sunday, October 19 2008. ( reply | permalink )
  • CaraBear
    • Rated 4 stars

    Wonderfully written, but hard to read at times because of the brutal nature of the plague...more compelling for me that i have actually visited the town (with a museum dedicated to the plague event) that this book is based on.

    CaraBear wrote this review Thursday, September 18 2008. ( reply | permalink )
  • Black Belt Reader
    • Rated 5 stars

    I am now a full-fledged Geraldine Brooks fan. My first exposure to her was "The People of the Book" which started me on my path to fandom, but "Year of Wonders" sealed the deal. "Year of Wonders" is based about the real plague village in England. A case of the plague comes to the village and quickly spreads. The village under the guidance of the minister agrees to shut itself off from the rest of the world in order to prevent the further spread of the plague. Brooks does a fabulous job of painting her characters in vivid colors. I could not imagine living through Anna's life with all the sickness, death, misery and confusion. I loved the integration of witchcraft. Although a novel, I feel like I learned a great deal about this time period in English history.

    Black Belt Reader wrote this review Sunday, September 14 2008. ( reply | permalink )
  • Sherie B
    • Rated 4 stars

    I agree with some other reviewers...wonderful historical fiction, vivid characters, I learned SO much about the plague...then the slapped-on, disappointing ending. I still think, WHAT?!?! Not to be a spoiler, but Michael would not act that way, and Anna would not make those decisions--at least the Michael and Anna that Brooks introduced to us throughout the rest of the book. But as I won't let that stop me from recommending the book, because it's still a beautifully written and thought-provoking story.

    Sherie B wrote this review Tuesday, September 9 2008. ( reply | permalink )
  • Marie T
    • Rated 5 stars

    What a tremendous story! I read it in one day; couldn't put it down. Lots of grim facts, but the author is wonderful with them, and the ending was a bit of a surprise.

    Marie T wrote this review Monday, September 8 2008. ( reply | permalink )
Displaying 1-10 of 150 reviews
© 2008 Shelfari, Inc. | Portions of Shelfari.com are Copyright © 1996-2008 Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates. Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy | Copyright Policy