lulu_bella says
Todd was the name of the director, but that seems like a silly reason to change the name of a character.
posted Monday, July 23 2007
(read lulu_bella’s review)
I agree. I was completely surprised when the book ended. I didn't realize that they changed Todd's name either, it's been a while since I saw the movie. That is weird. Who knows why they did these things. Maybe wikipedia knows.
artemis_98 says
I thought the movie was brilliant. It affected me way much more than the book. The movie is an excellent pages-to-pictures adaptation, in my view. I didn't even realize the endings were different! Or that Todd's name had been changed to Brad. (Shows how forgetful I am, I guess.)
(read artemis_98’s review)
skoolmom says
And Why in the World did they change Todd's name to Brad in the movie??Todd means Foxy or Fox like- seems a better choice.
mamacate says
The difference in endings completely bamboozled me. It almost seemed like they wanted to wrap things up in a neat little package for the movie, but WHY--especially since the rest of the movie was slavishly adherent to the book (as another commenter said, eerily so). It's not like the movie abandoned the book's nihilism; what good did the (marginally) neater ending do? Strange. I still enjoyed revisiting this world through the movie (seen about a year and a half after reading the book), though I certainly left it puzzled.
posted Sunday, July 22 2007