Swordspoint
 

Swordspoint

by Ellen Kushner

The classic forerunner to The Fall of the Kings now with three bonus stories.

Hailed by critics as “a bravura performance” (Locus) and “witty, sharp-eyed, [and] full of interesting people” (Newsday), this classic melodrama of manners, filled with remarkable plot twists and unexpected humor, takes fantasy to an unprecedented level of elegant writing and scintillating wit. Award-winning... (read more)

Top tags: fantasyqueer speculative fictionromancefictionellen kushner (all tags)

 

Member Reviews

  • Hope N
    • Rated 5 stars

    I read The Privilege of the Sword first, although it actually comes 2nd chronologically, and loved it. This book didn't disappointed, on the contrary, it was absolutely riveting and I think I liked it even better! The plot holds together well, but it's really Kushner's multi-dimensional, wonderful characters that do it.

    Hope N wrote this review Wednesday, August 20 2008. ( reply | permalink )
  • Wolf
    • Rated 0 stars

    Fall of the Kings IS better, but Swordspoint and it's subsequent followup- The Privilege of the Sword do carry the story quite well.

    Wolf wrote this review Friday, May 23 2008. ( reply | permalink )
  • krimon
    • Rated 4 stars

    A little bit of Tanya Huff, a little bit of Elizabeth Bear. I wasn't sure about this book at first, but wound up staying up late to finish the last few chapters. Although it's not exactly action-packed, the characters and their interconnections make for interesting reading, if providing a few wild-goose chases here and there.

    krimon wrote this review Friday, February 22 2008. ( reply | permalink )
  • Heather G
    • Rated 4 stars

    This book is labled fantasy but it reads more like historical fiction. I liked the swordsman Richard and the young nobel Godwin and wished he was in the story more. Overall an interesting book and I plan to read another by this author.

    Heather G wrote this review Friday, January 25 2008. ( reply | permalink )
  • Lissa T
    • Rated 2 stars

    s I think I've mentioned, when I was a teenager I was quiet enamoured of the fantasy genre. Books were something that I could always count on my mother purchasing for me. These two things added together equal a whole lot of unread books. I cannot bear to leave books unread and I have vowed not to purchase anymore books until I have read all that I have in my possession in New York. It is a combination of these factors that have led me to the horror that was Swordspoint.

    Swordspoint stradles the line between fantasy and historical fiction. There is no magic, no creatures, no quests - none of the hallmarks of the JRR Tolkein style fantasy novels. Instead, the book creates an alternate universe that approximates that of medieval England. So, instead of magic, we get swordfights and schemeing. And actually, that's really all we get for the entire book.

    The book begins with a serious of weighty quotes designed to foreshadow what happens in the rest of the book. But really, not a whole lot happens in the book. Swordspoint follows the life of Richard St. Vier, swordman for hire. Nobles who wish to exact revenge on other nobles hire him to kill. The nobles plot against each other and St. Vier gets caught in the middle, along with his lover, Alec, who has a mysterious past. That is the entire plot of the novel. The novel isn't really long enough to make us care about the characters enough to really care about the outcome of the plots. The addition of homosexuality to the book was surely edgy and in your face in 1987, but comes off as a bit out of place now with so many other fantasy writers doing it better. The book is prettily written, I suppose - but there's really not enough story to do any florid writing justice.

    Overall, extremely disappointing. This was Kushner's first novel. One must hope that if she managed to get another one published, it was better than this.

    Lissa T wrote this review Sunday, December 30 2007. ( reply | permalink )
  • dont kickmycane
    • Rated 4 stars

    I liked this book. The relationships were subtle and interesting, each character having flaws you wouldn't expect that affected their interactions more than a little bit unpredictable.[br/][br/]The political intrigues, while the central focus of the plot, I suppose, were just a backdrop for me. I'm more interested in reading about relationships than politics, and this book really delivered.

    dont kickmycane wrote this review Friday, November 23 2007. ( reply | permalink )
  • NeverFroze
    • Rated 5 stars

    I feel this book is very wonderfully written and though has none of those "big" plots that make up the general population of fantasy books. It's simply a story that the characters move.

    NeverFroze wrote this review Tuesday, September 18 2007. ( reply | permalink )
  • Theophania
    • Rated 2 stars

    Supposedly the sequel is better, but unless it's about 75% better I don't know how it could be that good.

    This is classified as "fantasy" in my library, although it seems more like imaginary historical fiction. there are no fairies or dragons, just a town and a political system that could have existed once, but didn't.

    I just couldn't get that interested in the cares of a swordsman and the political and sexual intrigues of his world.

    Theophania wrote this review Monday, May 14 2007. ( reply | view 1 replies | permalink )
© 2008 Shelfari, Inc. | Portions of Shelfari.com are Copyright © 1996-2008 Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates. Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy | Copyright Policy