Never Let Me Go
 

Never Let Me Go (Vintage International)

by Kazuo Ishiguro

From the Booker Prize-winning author of The Remains of the Day comes a devastating new novel of innocence, knowledge, and loss. As children Kathy, Ruth, and Tommy were students at Hailsham, an exclusive boarding school secluded in the English countryside. It was a place of mercurial cliques and mysterious rules where teachers were constantly reminding their charges of how special they were.... (read more)

Top tags: fictionscience fictiondystopiacontemporary fictionbritish (all tags)

 

Member Reviews

  • Egwene
    2 of 2 members found this review helpful.
    • Rated 4 stars

    Wow. Talk about fascinating and thought-provoking. The premise of this story is so different and so disturbing, in a way, and it brings up a lot of questions about morality and humanity. The way everything is presented is pretty unique, but it works really well and adds to the reality. All of the characters are very flawed, but they're very believable and they fit their background. Sometimes I had a difficult time liking them, yet I still cried for them at the end. It's incredibly tragic, so don't read it if you can't stand sad endings. Unfortunately, I'd also have to rate it R for sexual content. If you can get past that, though, then this is a truly amazing book.

    Egwene wrote this review Wednesday, July 23 2008. ( reply | view 1 replies | permalink )
  • TheophileEscargot
    2 of 2 members found this review helpful.
    • Rated 0 stars

    Seems like a bit of a return to the style of "Remains of the Day" and "An Artist of the Floating World": shorter, and relatively straightforward compared to his more tortuously contorted recent books.

    Book works on a couple of levels, one as an cooly horrific story; one as a meditation on lost opportunities and mortality. As usual though, Ishiguro carefully avoids details and specifics, so considered as an exercise in SF world-building it would be an abject failure. In this case that didn't irritate me though, as the ambiguities are essential.

    I'd class this as among his best books, and one of the best novels I've read in age. While short and with an easy prose style though, it is slow-paced and character-driven. Highly recommended.

    TheophileEscargot wrote this review Sunday, September 9 2007. ( reply | permalink )
  • abeesley
    1 of 1 members found this review helpful.
    • Rated 5 stars

    I read this book over two years ago and have never been able to stop thinking about it. Everything that was unsaid, and every question that goes not only unanswered but unasked in the book... Literally unforgettable.

    abeesley wrote this review Monday, September 22 2008. ( reply | permalink )
  • Shanmin D
    1 of 1 members found this review helpful.
    • Rated 4 stars

    This was a very beautiful book. The language was very delicate and tender and the concept was intriguing. I have to admit, there were parts where things were a little slow... and Kathy seemed to me a slightly weak character. But overall, I enjoyed it...

    Shanmin D wrote this review Sunday, July 20 2008. ( reply | permalink )
  • Jamie E
    1 of 1 members found this review helpful.
    • Rated 4 stars

    I found this book deeply moving. I liked that it touched on the ethics of human cloning without beating you over the head with it. I liked that we get to see the characters as human--flaws, emotions and all before we are asked to see them as the rest of the world does: organ donors, destined to die so others can live.

    Jamie E wrote this review Saturday, June 28 2008. ( reply | permalink )
  • dioni
    1 of 1 members found this review helpful.
    • Rated 4 stars

    This book is the second of Ishiguro that I read (first was When We Were Orphans). The style is a bit different. Easier to digest I’d say, a page turner. The author is good at giving hints to something in the past or the future, and makes me wanting more throughout the entire book.

    I can’t say more without spilling spoilers. So I’m just gonna blurt it out.

    *SPOILER WARNING*

    I think by now almost everyone that has heard about this book knows that it is about clones (As far as I recall though, the word “clone” is only mentioned twice in the entire book). I thought most of the aspects were covered pretty well, but I can’t help wondering why the idea of parents were not discussed at all. It should be a pretty sad moment to know that everybody else out there has parents and you don’t. But I guess they’ve always known that they’re “purposefully created”, and when everybody around you has the same fate as you, you would just accept things as they are. Like a frog never really wishes to fly.

    I found relationship between Ruth and Tommy is a bit hard to believe. I mean they’re really two different persons, and I can’t imagine them being together in the first place. But actually if you think more about it, they’re both a bit annoying. Ruth awfully pretentious and attention seeker. Tommy childish, weak, indecisive (he waited until Ruth allowed Kath and him to be together to do something about it? Anyway he never did much about anything.)

    I’m also wondering what’s the significance of alphabets for their last name. I thought A would be the first clone for that person, B second, and so on. But they never mentioned anything about it and my theory doesn’t make much sense too, because if it’s true then if Kath’s last name is H, that means she’s the 8th clone, which means the real person where they take the gene from has probably be dead a long time ago if they wait for each clone to ‘complete’ to make the same clone. But Kath tried to find her ‘possible’ and she thought she was alive. If they make a few of the same clones at the same time, wouldn’t she wonder where the other clones are, and not just her ‘possible’? So anyway, their ‘last name’ confused me.

    Many things are just eerie. The way they say ‘complete’ to mark their discontinuation to live. The way Madame and Miss Emily so matter-of-factly and cold-heartedly explain everything to them and dismiss them just like that. Not to mention the whole donor thingy.

    After I finished the book, when I looked back, I thought the characters are almost void of emotions in just a very eerie way. There’s no big emotion to whatever new things that they discovered no matter how shocking it was. And rightly so. After all, they’re clones, which were doubted that they even had a soul.

    dioni wrote this review Monday, May 12 2008. ( reply | view 2 replies | permalink )
  • chris w
    1 of 1 members found this review helpful.
    • Rated 5 stars

    So subtly devastating. /As I was reading, I felt I was being watched, I was being manipulated. The mark of a well-written story, when the reader loses all sense of reality! Thought provoking. I cannot stop thinking about it. I'd think every person alive should read this book. Brings up some concepts that need to be dealt with in our minds.

    chris w wrote this review Thursday, March 20 2008. ( reply | permalink )
  • Cassie Wallender
    1 of 1 members found this review helpful.
    • Rated 4 stars

    Ishiguro, famous for The Remains of the Day, writes in this novel the sci-fi book for the non sci-fi reader. It is not about the sci-fi themes in the book, it is about the lives of the characters, and the sci-fi components are there as if it was any other regular part of life. In that way, it's one of the more realistic sci-fi books I've read, even though it is extremely vague technically, relying on a reader who supposedly comes from the same world and understands that this is just how it is without needing careful explanation.

    I can't give out detail without potentially ruining the book - so no skipping ahead and reading the last chapter first. Essentially, it is a coming of age story that emphasises a critical look at humanity's acceptance of its surroundings without question. It is a book about the value of life, the importance of delicacy of relationships, about aspirations and manipulations. It's about what makes us human, and sometimes the human ability to be inhumane. The most powerful part of this book is the subtle critique it offers for what we can accept, whether it is other people's suffering or even our own suffering, without challenging what we've been told.

    It's sweet in a sad, quiet way; and a lovely book all in all. I would definitely be interested in reading more from Kazuo Ishiguro.

    Cassie Wallender wrote this review Monday, October 16 2006. ( reply | permalink )
  • Mel
    • Rated 0 stars

    I've put this one aside...and plan to read it again....hoping it will be as amazing as all the talk about it...don't see it yet...

    Mel wrote this review yesterday. ( reply | permalink )
  • chicklitaddict
    • Rated 2 stars

    I honestly didn't "get" this book, it moved very, very slowly, and this plot has been done before. I could guess what the "suspense" was before it was revealed. I tried to hang in there, but by the time I reached part deux, I was pretty bored. So I'm not giving this book more than two stars. Sorry.

    chicklitaddict wrote this review 5 days ago. ( reply | permalink )
Displaying 1-10 of 214 reviews
© 2008 Shelfari, Inc. | Portions of Shelfari.com are Copyright © 1996-2008 Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates. Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy | Copyright Policy