“Some excellent writing, good arguments and interesting data are clouded by what seems to be unbendable author bias. The facts appear forced to fit the argument at times. The writing is clever (with chapter and section headings like "the four horsemen of the Eupocolypse") and partially convincing. For me, it's hard for me to put my finger on "the straw man that broke the camel's back" but I found, by pushing his views so far, straining logic and language to do it, the author lost me.”