Liked It“I have no words to describe this book. I was almost in a different universe after reading this book. Read this and you will begin to question every thing you ever "believed" in. |
Didn’t Like It“A nice thought experience but leaves a lot of doubts unanswered.I think Scott Adams should limit himself to drawing dilbert only.” see full review » see other reviews » |
“Very good book makes you think”
Ryan S wrote this review 5 days ago. ( reply | permalink ) Was this review helpful? Yes | No“Adams says its a thought experiment, didn`t feel like this guy wrote Dilbert too ! He seems somewhat of cross between Richard Bach and Stephen Hawking, although incorrect and unequivocal in some areas, its still a fantastic read !”
shakeshere wrote this review 3 weeks ago. ( reply | permalink ) Was this review helpful? Yes | No“Sounds interesting”
Marlene A wrote this review Thursday, September 17 2009. ( reply | permalink ) Was this review helpful? Yes | No“I have no words to describe this book. I was almost in a different universe after reading this book. Read this and you will begin to question every thing you ever "believed" in.
What's even harder to believe is the fact that a book of such intensity is from the author of Dilbert, the king of humor.”
“Well thought-out book. I can read it over and over and over and..”
Ariane C wrote this review Tuesday, August 25 2009. ( reply | permalink ) Was this review helpful? Yes | No“A thought experiment indeed.”
John Ellis wrote this review Sunday, August 2 2009. ( reply | permalink ) Was this review helpful? Yes | No“Scott Adams did a great job of spinning my brain around in my skull!! This is a book that I'll be re-reading a few times just to pick up on the ideas that I missed the first time around. ”
Michelle J wrote this review Wednesday, April 8 2009. ( reply | permalink ) Was this review helpful? Yes | No“A nice thought experience but leaves a lot of doubts unanswered.I think Scott Adams should limit himself to drawing dilbert only.”
Ravi Dawar wrote this review Sunday, March 29 2009. ( reply | permalink ) Was this review helpful? Yes | No