join now| sign in| help
Search advanced search
 
Books
Search:
The Gods Themselves

The Gods Themselves

by Isaac Asimov

Only a few know the terrifying truth--an outcast Earth scientist, a rebellious alien inhabitant of a dying planet, a lunar-born human intuitionist who senses the imminent annihilation of the Sun.  They know the truth--but who will listen?  They have foreseen the cost of abundant energy--but who will believe?  These few beings, human and alien, hold the key to the Earth's survival. (read review)

Top tags: science fiction,  fiction,  asimov,  isaac asimov,  scifi (all tags)

Readers

Groups

Other Reviews

Amazon Reviews
 

Most Helpful Reviews

Liked It

2 of 2 members found this review helpful.
jasonpettus
  • Rated 4 stars

“(Over the next two years, I am writing an ongoing series of essays here that I call the "CCLaP 100," whereby I read for the first time a hundred books considered by many to be classics, and then write reports here on whether or not I think they deserve this title. For the complete list of books, as well as an explanation behind how the list was compiled, [a href="http://www.cclapcenter.com/2007/12/personal_essay_announcing_the.html"]you can click here[/a].)

The CCLaP 100: In...”

jasonpettus’s full review »
more reviews »

Didn’t Like It

Aphreal
  • Rated 1 stars

“This is the book that convinced me Asimov was being overly arrogant in refusing to edit his work.
It's divided into three sections that really feel like they have little to do with each other.
The first is very scientific and requires a decent understanding of physics and chemistry. I found it pretty dry, but it set up some interesting ideas.
The second part is the gem of this book: a narrative set in another dimension with beings completely alien to our understanding of life...”

Aphreal’s full review »
more reviews »
Community:
  • Rated 3.908046 stars
Amazon:
  • Rated 4 stars
  

Newest Comments

  • Purav Master

    purav master said:

    “The book was a fun-time to read but the chapter "The Gods themselves" was a bit boring. Asimov described the daily life of the para-men in too much detail, probably to let us get the proper hold of those characters and their universe. And the moment when Odeen, Tritt and Dua realize that THEY are Estwald was really nice.

    But i could not understand a few things. The Pump actually violates the basic conservation laws of mass and charge. So the very foundation of physics might hve been shaken. I understand that this was fiction but still he should have included some "theory" to explain that.

    But the book was a bit slow but worth reading...”

    posted Monday, June 9 2008
  • Britt

    britt said:

    “Asimov's choice of genders for the Soft Ones?

    Asimov was obviously using the Soft Ones to explore sexual taboos, sexuality, gender roles, and the concept of gender itself. I find his choices for the genders resoundingly odd, however, and wonder what kind of point he was trying to make about gender roles.

    The aliens could have been referred to as "it", or they could have been given a male or female pronoun randomly, but instead, each of the three Soft-One genders is assigned the pronoun "he" or "she."

    The Rational, a.k.a. Left, member of the triad was male, and this makes perfect sense in terms of reproductive sex, because the Left contributes the "seed." It also makes sense in terms of stereotypical gender roles, which cast logical thinking more of a male trait than a female trait.

    The Emotional, a.k.a. Middle, was given the female gender. The Middle's role in reproduction was to facilitate the process, which I think has little bearing on biological gender. However, the Middle's role as the Emotional clearly makes it stereotypically female, and the Middles are characterized as having stereotypically female traits, flirtatiousness, flightiness, etc.

    The one that stumps me is the Right, or Parental member of the triad, which is referred to as "he." Wouldn't the logical pronoun be "she?" The Parental is the one that receives the seed and bears young, making it the closest biological analog to the terrestrial female. The Parental also rears children, a stereotypical female role.

    Is this supposed to be the exception that brings to light the arbitrary nature of human notions of gender and sexuality? In other words, was making the Right's gender male just a rejection of the "obvious" choice? If so, then why not make the Left female or the Middle male?

    There is a lovely moment when the young Parental, Tritt, wants to experiment sexually with Odeen. Was assigning the pronoun "he" to the Parental gender just a set-up for this provocative "homosexual" encounter, intended to challenge the reader's notion of sexuality?

    Or maybe Asimov decided each one with the flip of a coin.

    What do you think?
    ”

    posted Saturday, June 2 2007 ( | view 1 reply )

Similar Books

© 2009 Shelfari, Inc. | Portions of Shelfari.com are Copyright © 1996-2009 Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates. Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy | Copyright Policy

Close