Books

jmadigan
10 of 11 members found this review helpful.
  • Rated 5 stars

The Road by Cormac McCarthy is one of those books that once you finish it, you toss it down and say "Okay, gonna kill myself now!" It is also riveting, engaging, and beautifully written, so it's worth it.

The hook is pretty simple: A man and his son (both unnamed for the duration of the book) are following a road West in the wake of some world searing apocalypse (also unnamed and tantalizingly undiscussed). Things are bleak. Really bleak, with the land bereft of nearly all plant and animal life. Besides the occasional scavenger like the Man and the Boy who fend off starvation by hunting for hidden caches of food left over from the past, gangs of cannibalistic marauders hunt their fellow men and women as one of the last sources of food. Giant firestorms also occasionally flash through the landscape, but in general it's always cold and dark and hopeless. But the Man and the Boy plod on, weighed down by constant misery and fear because it's all they can do.

Really, if the only thing McCarthy was aiming to do with this book is to create a tone of fear, hopelessness, and misery, then he succeeded better than anyone I've ever seen. You feel REALLY bad for these two travelers, and you feel their despair. They're constantly in danger, be it either from cannibals, starvation, or freezing to death. So on one level it's a straight up and powerful adventure (or, if you prefer, horror) story.

But McCarthy manages to do more than just that. He also builds in messages about blind perseverance and survival, and how those traits take form for better or worse depending on whether they're tempered by other traits, like mercy or trust. The Man is bent on survival, and is thus reluctant to help or even associate the scant few other travelers they meet. He sees them as a threat and a drain on their meager stores when they're already faced with almost certain starvation. He is, in short, instinctively slogging along path to survival that takes him straight through cruelty. The Boy, on the other hand, still retains some of his innocence and the basic human need to comfort, help, and band together with others no matter the personal cost. Yet he is subservient to the Man and unable to act on these drives. Taken together, it's a great examination of the competing human drives to both alienate and include others as a means of survival. I won't tell you which wins out (or if, in fact, both fail), because the resolution of this conflict is probably the most powerful moment in an already moving novel. You should read it for yourself.

It's also worth noting how much I like McCarthy's prose. I can see how some people may get annoyed with him given the liberties he takes with basics like punctuation and sentence structure, but on the whole I thought that the prose was lyrical, elegant, flowing, and very much a part of the whole experience. While it's generally pared down and minimal (the book is well under 300 pages), it didn't bother me as much as say Hemmingway. It just flowed better, and in this case seemed right since this was (on the surface, anyway) a small story about two people fighting to survive in a bleak and largely featureless and barren world.

So, it's not an upbeat book by any stretch but I liked it. Quite a bit.

jmadigan wrote this review Tuesday, April 15 2008. ( reply | view 2 replies | permalink )
  • Matt S

    matt s said:

    That was very well said. I too liked McCarthy's prose in this novel. After struggling through Atlas Shrugged (I'm still trying to figure out Ayn Rand's popularity), It was a very pleasant read, story content excluded. "Giant firestorms also occasionally flash through the landscape,..." I thought the giant firestorms were always referenced in the past, but maybe I that's just my interpretation. I'll have to look at that the next time I read this book, which will probably be many more times (provided my future is not as bleak). "He also builds in messages about blind perseverance and survival, and how those traits take form for better or worse depending on whether they're tempered by other traits, like mercy or trust." This was the crux of this book. I imagine McCarthy coming up with this concept, and then the rest of the book focused on providing a vehicle of presenting that single concept in the most crude and raw form imaginable. After reading that book, I felt like I was meant to read that book, that my life's events all lead up to reading that book, for whatever reason. I don't believe in most of that metaphysical stuff, but what I do believe is McCarthy's writing is just that good.

    posted Thursday, July 24 2008
  • Jabber

    jabber said:

    You said everything I was unable to put into words. I was afraid of saying anything concrete about the book for fear of giving anything away but you described this novel so perfectly and did not spoil a single moment. Very well done. I interpreted the book much more like a human version of an Animal Planet program, a male animal teaching his cub how to survive and that is true on the surface, but you honed in on the much deeper themes of the story. I just finished the book a couple of hours ago and I'm glad it is still so fresh in my mind because it allows me to rethink it, taking your thoughts into consideration. Take care! Dan

    posted Sunday, April 5 2009
Advertisement