Members with This Book
Most Helpful Reviews
see all reviews
Liked It “Exciting! The lanuage is hard, though.” see full review » see other reviews » |
Didn’t Like It1 of 1 members found this review helpful “For several months around the age of 10 or 12, I repeatedly borrowed this from our tiny town library. I think the version I had may have been longer than this one, or it just felt longer to my younger eyes. |
Newest Reviews
see all reviews-
“ Exciting! The lanuage is hard, though.”
Lucy M wrote this review 10 days ago. ( reply | permalink ) Was this review helpful? Yes | No
“Very rarely do I not finish a book, but this just happened to be one of them. I found this story to be hard to understand, not just because of the words used, but the way it was written. I also thought the story was very slow, so it was hard to read. ”
~ Sydney ~ wrote this review Wednesday, November 25 2009. ( reply | permalink ) Was this review helpful? Yes | No
“i read like the first three pages and didnt understand it
Volleyball = My Life wrote this review Tuesday, October 13 2009. ( reply | permalink ) Was this review helpful? Yes | No
it was in old english”
“It has a great story line, bu the medieval language is not for the faint at heart. AKA Be Prepared, it's confusing!”
Samantha W wrote this review Wednesday, September 23 2009. ( reply | permalink ) Was this review helpful? Yes | No
“His version in old english is THE best book about King Arthur. I have read others, but if it's not in old english it losses much of it's magic. ”
Whatshername wrote this review Sunday, September 6 2009. ( reply | permalink ) Was this review helpful? Yes | No
“Great book. I've been looking for a book on King Arthur, and although this one isn't very thorough, it is still a very great read. Probably meant for children though since it has a sort of moral at the end of most chapters.”
ScarTissue wrote this review Monday, August 17 2009. ( reply | permalink ) Was this review helpful? Yes | No
“Stories of knights and medieval times, especially those of legends and King Arthur, are always a good read, but somehow I found this book a little slow, a little boring even; perhaps the style, or the pacing...
gilesaquil wrote this review Saturday, June 27 2009. ( reply | permalink ) Was this review helpful? Yes | No
Mediocre for entertainment purposes.”
“'The nobility of spirit that moved these excellent men afford such a perfect example of courage and humility one would do well to follow it. For King Arthur was the most honorable Knight who ever lived and his fellows of the Round Table, such a company of noble knights that it is hardly to be supposed their like will be seen again.'”
Earl wrote this review Tuesday, June 2 2009. ( reply | permalink ) Was this review helpful? Yes | No
“I hope this is a good book”
Dylan B wrote this review Tuesday, May 12 2009. ( reply | permalink ) Was this review helpful? Yes | No
“This book was an excellent book. this book was filled with action. king arthur was a child who had strength and the looks to become king. he had taken out the sword out of the stone, while many dukes and kings also tried but failed greatly. with a pull, out came to sword and he became king arthur. King arthur had a table of knights. his knights were loyal to their king. this book was a good book because this was a adventurous and fantastic book. this book was filled with action and in the end, he dies and he is remembered by his round table of knights. i recommend this book to people who like to read adventurous books. ”
MARTIN M wrote this review Monday, February 23 2009. ( reply | permalink ) Was this review helpful? Yes | No
