It is not unexpected, that in the myth of Sisyphus, Albert Camus, describes human predicament as a form of exile and life as a meaningless struggle. Granted, Camus presents his philosophy of absurdity in all his works, but in this special work he's clearly explaining how his unique view of life's absurdity came to life.

Camus is simply trying to say that absurdity is the incompatibility between this irrational world and humans' eternal needs to reason and search for a purpose in life. Through a rigorous examination of various philosophers' work, Camus argues that most thinkers faced the absurdity and tried to escape it, i.e. by either accepting the world's irrationality and finding God in the process, or as phenomenology proposes, rejecting rationality unless the human mind can comprehend it.

The most intriguing aspect is that Camus is not arguing the righteousness of his absurd thinking; he's just proposing that this way of thinking is inevitable (maybe just like death). He is debating the possibility of living with the absurd instead of trying to overcome it. Also, Camus doesn't debate any atheist thoughts, and doesn't deny God's existence or admit it. Camus simply admits that he doesn't know of a definite way to know if there's a God or purpose to life, and wonders if he can survive knowing the absurd and living with it. However, I disagree with Camus' conclusion that Kafka is an existentialist who chooses a leap of faith over accepting life's absurdity. Kafka produced great works without forcing a conclusion, leaving it to the readers to come to their own resolution.

Another interesting point that Camus raises-but I prefer to ignore as my own act of eluding-is talking about Don Juanism as related to being absurd; Camus just dismisses all assumptions that Don Juan is melancholy or seeking true love , he's simply an innocent human (as opposed to Christian concept of sin) who enjoys the moment, the day to day seductions, and the increased number of his conquests. What Camus is proposing might be real but it dismisses the harm of living without a moral code which leads in a way to earlier nihilism.

Over all, Camus magnificently analyzes many aspects of life: hope, suicide, death, freedom, and conquest, which might be an absurd reasoning to some people who prefer to blind them selves with hope or "act of eluding" as Camus refers to it, but I'm sure to others, it is very intriguing and refreshing.

Camus's act of questioning the absurdity of life at this point while still trying to live life meaningfully is just an outstanding thinking act coming from a very subjective thinker.