I read this book when it first came out in the 90s. I loved the way Sen. Clinton, who was then First Lady, related to the struggles that face American families. She showed compassion as well as incredible intelligence.

I am a Mormon, and one thing that impressed me about this book is that Hillary praised the Mormon practice of holding Family Home Evenings once a week. (My family did this growing up). Hillary's point with this book is that we need to look at what's working for American families. We need to emulate good practices in the private sector, and put government back on the side of families.

I think Hillary Clinton is a true hero, and feminine role model. I supported her bid for presidency, not because I agreed with her on every issue, but because I respected her, and felt excited to support a female candidate.

Regardless of party affiliation (I'm a Republican), this book is intelligent, well-researched and written and beneficial to the public policy discourse.

I recommend it!

This book is regurgitated Karl Marx. Everyone remembers his spoutings about industry and its relation to class struggle but he was very opinionated on how to raise children to fit in with his vision of a socialist Utopia. And Hillary Clinton's viewpoints mirror his nearly word for word. Maybe people think his writings are too old for it to be labeled plagiarism but it's like she copied it and added a word or two of her own once in a while.

I wouldn't read this book for a million dollars. She has shown many times on the campaign trail that nothing that comes out of her mouth has any value at all. She is a politician...and since when can any politician be trusted.

I bought this book to give to a friend as a joke (and it turned out to be pretty funny, I'll spare you the details). Please note that I bought this book used so that Hillary Rodham Chavez didn't receive any money from my purchase.

The premise is a good one (p 317), "Each of us...has the opportunity and responsibility to protect and nurture children." And it would be hard to argue with her contention that (p 16), "Whether or not you are a parent, what happens to America's children affects your present and your future." But the book's subtitle, "And Other Lessons Children Teach Us," is a misnomer, as it is more about lessons Ms. Rodham Clinton wants to impart on readers than those provided by children. The real deal, supposedly, is this (p 17): "It is a statement of my personal views, a reflection of my continuing meditation on children."

Although many topics are touched on, including personal histories of both the Rodham and Clinton clans, and her personal parenting experiences (like six-year-old Chelsea role-playing her father's negative opponent during a reelection campaign), most of the book concerns child-related policy and politics. She shares what the husband and wife team have achieved on the issue: (p 49) "To prevent these children from languishing in foster care, my husband signed legislation...," (p 90) "The Family and Medical Leave Act, the first bill my husband signed into law as President...," (p 137) "The Brady Bill, which my husband signed into law in 1993...," (p 200, 201) " As my husband said in his 1995 State of the Union address:...," "(p 210) "As I said in my speech at the United Nations Fourth World Conference...," (p 237) "On October 31, 1995, I hosted an event at the White House...," (p 244) "I began to work on behalf of education reform in Arkansas in 1983...," and (p 265) "In 1994, the President, again with bipartisan support, signed the School-to-Work Opportunities Act." She sites research: (p 72) "Two in five American teenage girls become pregnant by the age of twenty...," (p 132) "Three times as many children die each year from preventable household accidents than from murder," (p 133) "Nearly half of all American households have guns...," (p 271) "...every year the average American child watches more than a thousand stylized and explicit rapes, murders, armed robberies, and assaults on television," and number four of the Goals 2000 list (p 261), "United States students will be first in the year [by the year 2000] in science and mathematics achievement." And she includes recommendations: (p 82) "Radio and television stations could broadcast child care tips...," (p 120) "Brisk walking, hiking and bicycling are all good exercise and are great ways to spend time together as well," (p 144) "Adults should practice counting to ten and taking a deep breath before contributing to the climate of incivility and insecurity that surrounds us," (p 172) "If more parents introduced their children to faith and prayer at home...I am sure there would be fewer calls for prayer in schools," (p 188) "Standing up for tolerance and respect in front of children gives them models for how to confront bigotry on their own...," and the biggee (p 127) "A reformed health care system that guarantees all children the medical care they need." But overall, it's a bit disjointed and unfocused. While she makes some excellent points, her writing is somewhat stiff and awkwardly overfilled with words and phrases in quotes ("the way things used to be," "come naturally," "upsized," "your turn"). It would have read better if, instead of meandering, she had stuck to the apparent issue: U.S. policy on child-related issues. Better: Mountains Beyond Mountains by Tracy Kidder, There is No Me Without You by Melissa Fay Greene, Three Cups of Tea by Greg Mortenson and David Oliver Relin, and Dreams of My Father by Barack Obama.

I decided to read this book because if Senator Clinton becomes president, I needed to know what we would be dealing with. I must admit that I am finding it difficult to get through, as I am only 1/3 done.

First, I find her words disingenuous about her care, concern, and love for children because I can't help thinking about her stance on abortion. It just doesn't make sense. How could someone adore children this much, and yet disregard those babies in the womb?

Second, Senator Clinton reveals many ideas in regards to caring for babies and children that will fall under the responsibility of the taxpayer. Her ideas include: teaching parents how to care for their baby or child, how to talk to him, how to feed him, how to discipline him, and the like. She highlights programs in Europe and Asia where health care representatives make house visits for 10 days after the birth of a baby, as well as one that makes visits monthly for up to five years to check on the family. Talk about losing our privacy!

Senator Clinton brings up good points, that the family is broken down, and many do not have good intentions when it comes to children. However, govenment stepping in is not the solution. It never is. So many of these issues are already being addressed through government, hospitals, schools, and private organizations to help teach child care, but when people's hearts are not right in the first place, God is the only solution.

In the end, though, I think we can look forward to a lot of these ideas being implemented under the guise of Universal Healthcare, which she is making her number one priority. Besides that caring for children should not be government's job, it scares me very much to know she just may get what she thinks is so important.