Our Mutual Friend

by Charles Dickens

Charles Dickens's last completed novel tells the story of a young man who must marry a stranger in order to win his inheritance. Wanting to learn the lady's nature, John Harmon fakes his own death and takes on a new identity. As the complexities of the deceit are revealed, Dickens gives us his most profoundly cynical, yet brilliantly funny, insight into the corruption of wealth on human nature.... (read more)

Top tags: classicfictionenglandliteraturecharles dickens (all tags)

 

Member Reviews

  • Lord Manleigh
    4 of 4 members found this review helpful.
    • Rated 5 stars

    “Our Mutual Friend” is the Master's most complex, Bosch-like cosmos, where all we encounter seems to be distorted by the light of flickering torches and glowing brimstone. It's a tale of greed, lust, envy…in fact, I’m sure all of the Seven Deadly Sins factor in at some point. It’s a study of contamination, of corruption. No character reaches the final page untainted; it’s only a matter of degree. The Thames snakes through the story like a virus, riddled with corpses; the source of the wealth that drives the characters mad is a heap of dust. Don’t worry, it’s an enormously funny novel, but it’s Dickens’ blackest comedy and bitterest satire.

    Dickens also mines psychological depths here that were uncharted territory for him. Bradley Headstone, the respectable schoolmaster who disintegrates into a frenzy of horror and madness in his lust for Lizzie Hexam, could have wandered in from a Dostoevsky novel. The effect of his presence upon this otherwise Dickensian universe is fascinating. It is as if his tortured, conflicted psyche spreads throughout the novel like a contagion. The characters are like people encountered in nightmare, whose faces keep shifting along with their motives. Each is more confusing than the last. Nowhere else in Dickens are his villains and his heroes more ambiguous.

    This was his last complete novel, and I think it is the summit of his achievement.

    Lord Manleigh wrote this review Tuesday, October 16 2007. ( reply | permalink )
  • Frabjous Day
    1 of 1 members found this review helpful.
    • Rated 5 stars

    Amidst some fifteen major novels, most of them enchanting, the wondrously atypical Great Expectations and the typically wondrous Our Mutual Friend may be the two novels Dickens wrote that are flawless as well as enchanting. The gigantic cast all lock hands and interlink and move in tandem like clockwork, quite unlike the similarly vast dramatis personae of, say, the similarly brilliant Bleak House. That wonderful novel, by virtue of its great darkness and desolation, was one of the novels that led critics to wonder if Dickens would ever write as happily or kindly as of old. If Great Expectations brought back "the old Pickwick style" they wanted, then Our Mutual Friend, the very next novel, more than follows in its tradition. Its brand of humour is, to be sure, at times the blackest that Dickens ever produced, but it is giddy, buoyant and filled with love for its targets. All kinds of avarice, deceit, madness and murder populate the narrow streets and treacherous waterways of its London, and still I can't think of it as anything but a hopeful novel. There is pathos and anger and a measure of savagery in it but also, I think, a great deal of whimsy in this story of "money, money, money and what money can make of life". Money, old and new, is the pivot about which this novel's universe revolves, and as that universe turns it successively covets it, rejects it, hoards it, wastes it, glorifies and vilifies it. Money is all that the miserly Mr.Harmon leaves behind him and it is money for which his son is drugged and thrown, senseless, into the river; it is money that prompts the Thames watermen to creep slowly up and down its length, combing the waters for dead bodies; it is money that Bella Wilfer feels she must marry; it is money that damns every hope and love of heroic Lizzie Hexam's, and it is money which makes a spiteful blackmailer of the otherwise merely spiteful Silas Wegg. This frankly mercenary world is populated by, among others, the hilariously superficial Veneerings, the scheming, conniving, unloving Lammles, the insouciant, insolvent and irrepressibly witty Eugene Wrayburn, Mr.Harmon's loveable servants -- the Boffins -- who suddenly and bewilderedly inherit a hundred thousand pounds, the sepulchral and pricelessly funny Mrs.Wilfer, the crippled and indomitable dolls' dressmaker Jenny Wren, and the matchlessly creepy taxidermist Mr.Venus. If ever there has been a structure both bright and unremittingly real, it is this. We watch its characters, as we do those of so many of the earlier novels, from atop the great transparent glass house that contains them, but sin and depravity have not, as they have in Bleak House, festered and rotted the beams quite away. That mist of time, that gentle haze as of doubt and regret, which casts shadow and ambiguity over Great Expectations is not here. The great edifice does not conclude by crashing down catastrophically upon its shellshocked inmates, nor does it obscure the slightest detail, for good or worse, of their characters. In the end, no one is allowed the cowardice of slipping quietly away from life and the story, and no one is allowed any real secrets: a strange sort of compact is made between them, pledging them to truth and bravery. Money or no money, life is a thing that must be weathered, and truth and bravery have miraculous sustaining power.

    Frabjous Day wrote this review 9 days ago. ( reply | permalink )
  • hollybier
    1 of 1 members found this review helpful.
    • Rated 5 stars

    The best of Dickens, and my very favorite novel. Gone is the inevitable "young man down on his luck" protagonist. In his place is a staggering cast of scoundrels, saints, and those struggling somewhere in the middle. The sheer amount of different plot lines can be somewhat confusing to follow, but everything wraps ups beautifully in the end. Dickens' social satire has always made me laugh, but it's at its best in Our Mutual Friend.

    hollybier wrote this review Tuesday, March 13 2007. ( reply | permalink )
  • James H
    • Rated 3 stars

    Charles Dickens' penultimate novel, and last complete one, is a compendium of the best and worst of his art. The characters are present, perhaps too many, but they lack the fresh life and spirit of earlier works like Dombey & Son or Bleak House.
    The metaphors are present, but the waters of Our Mutual Friend are dark and foreboding, ultimately leading to death; while the waters of earlier works, such as Dombey again, hold the promise of life. It seems that Dickens is worn out and it shows in the lack of energy; but in spite of this there remain beautiful passages and complex plotting, perhaps his greatest. His critique of social class and society surrounds the story with the caricature of the Veneerings at its apex. Within the story he uses his theme of false identity as well as he ever has with one of the central characters, John Harmon, the prime specimen. But he fails to provide a central character with whom we can identify as he did so well in David Copperfield, Bleak House and Great Expectations. The Boffins, who are very appealing at first, appear to change their moral character and thus disappoint (at least Mr. Boffin) while the most appealing characters, like Jenny Wren or Lizzie Hexam, are not substantial enough or central enough to carry the novel. So we have a novel that receives a mixed grade from this reader. I finished it longing for the early Dickens humor and the later Dickens greatness but was left with a bit of that but not enough to sustain the 800 pages he had devoted to the story of Our Mutual Friend.

    James H wrote this review Wednesday, October 22 2008. ( reply | permalink )
  • cloverkite
    • Rated 5 stars

    When I learned about an alternate ending to Great Expectations I couldn't decide which one was better, the official one or the original. In this book, however, I really would've liked it better if Dickens had stuck to the original turn of events because it would've put the main characters in a more tangled situation. It would've left me wondering all the more about the ending. I read that Dickens didn't have enough to time to write in that direction which is why he ended the story the way it is. The way this book went I didn't find myself asking "How's it going to end?" as many times as I usually do when I read Dickens' novels.

    I thought that as Bradley Headstone became the symbol of jealousy's power so should Mr. Boffin be of greed's. However it turned out differently with Mr. Boffin and he did not become one of the characters that send a message to readers the way Headstone's character does. Still many other characters in this book does that.

    I liked Dickens' humor in this book, it seemed, to me, a form of protest to the prejudices of the higher society. Reading Dickens' works never fails to gratify me. It always makes me feel like I'm being educated without boring me for a second. That's brilliant story-telling.

    cloverkite wrote this review Friday, August 29 2008. ( reply | permalink )
  • Adam Selzer
    • Rated 5 stars

    Perhaps Dickens' most challenging book, it's like the whole Dickens library in one volume. Not as funny as his funniest stuff, but just as rewarding as the rest of his best work.


    Adam Selzer wrote this review Friday, July 4 2008. ( reply | permalink )
  • ninamann
    • Rated 3 stars

    This is second string Dickens. It never seemed to have the depth of Oliver Twist, Bleak House, David Copperfield and the rest of the "biggies". That being said, it is still a good book, but if you are not a fan of Dickens or long-winded 19th C lit, save your reading stamina for one of his more necessary works. It's fun for fans, but not a must read.

    ninamann wrote this review Monday, February 4 2008. ( reply | permalink )
  • Rose B
    • Rated 4 stars

    Oddly, this final, completed novel by Charles Dickens is the one that I found easiest to read. His cast of characters is as immense as ever and the plot twists and turns to intwine the fates of his characters are complex.

    Rose B wrote this review Thursday, November 15 2007. ( reply | permalink )
  • 7neen Z
    • Rated 5 stars

    I respect classics ..... love that Era !

    7neen Z wrote this review Wednesday, October 31 2007. ( reply | permalink )
Displaying 1-10 of 13 reviews
© 2008 Shelfari, Inc. | Portions of Shelfari.com are Copyright © 1996-2008 Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates. Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy | Copyright Policy