A scathing exposé of the judges and lawyers who put criminals’ rights ahead of victims’ rights When Wendy Murphy was a young prosecutor, she learned that the deck is stacked in favor of criminal defendants. Between their arrest and (potential) conviction, murderers, rapists, and drug... read more
“When the public makes a lot of noise, the courts are less inclined to do the wrong thing.”Author
“I'm confident that, together, we can make victims' rights laws work the way they're supposed to in every criminal case.”Author
“The feeling is: Why bother reporting a crime? The justice process is slow, painful, and usually reslts in the wrong verdict or such little punishment that it's not worth the time or trouble.”Author
“Victims should have lawyers accompany them to the police station when a crime is being reported to ensure that police conduct the best anf fairestpossible investigatn. (And why not? Criminals' lawyers often accompany their clients to police stations to undermine police investigations.) And victim lawyers should be helping prosecutors by appearing in court when appropriate to represent the victim's personal rights and interests.”Author
“As I noted in the introduction, we like to brag to other countries that we have the best system on the planet. But then, in a couple of high-profile cases where theevidence of guilt is overwhelming, we show our true colors, and they are not pretty. The (O.J.) Simpson verdict was painful enough, but the (Michael) Jackson verdict -- yeesh!”Author
FOREWORD
INTRODUCTION: YOU CALL THIS JUSTICE?
ONE: MURPHY'S LAW, REWRITTEN
TWO: MANUFACTURING INNOCENCE WITH DNA LIES
THREE: VICTORY THROUGH INTIMIDATION
FOUR: RACE BAITING
FIVE: WINNING THROUGH PAYOFFS AND EXTORTION
SIX: USING DELAY STRATEGICALLY
SEVEN: MANIPULATING THE MEDIA
EIGHT: PICKING DUMB JURORS
NINE: EXPLOITING VICTIMS' FEARS
TEN: USING THE CROSS-FINGERPOINTING MANEUVER
ELEVEN: BULLYING THE ADVOCATES
TWELVE: SELLING UNFAIR PUNISHMENT AS RESTORATIVE JUSTICE
THIRTEEN: CO-OPTING THE PUBLIC WITH THE VICTIMS' RIGHTS CHARADE
FOURTEEN: CLAIMING A SUSPECT PASSED A POLYGRAPH
FIFTEEN: MOUNTING A NOT-THE-CRIMINAL-TYPE DEFENSE
SIXTEEN: BLAMING THE VICTIM
SEVENTEEN: LEGISLATING NOTHINGNESS AND CONFUSION
EIGHTEEN: CALLING CHILD PORNOGRAPHY HARMLESS
NINETEEN: INVENTING IMAGINARY CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS
TWENTY: LAUNCHING POLITICAL PERSECUTIONS
TWENTY-ONE: SUING THE VICTIM
TWENTY-TWO: CLEANING UP THE DIRT
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
INDEX
We’re hiding the ridiculously simplified synopses, themes, errata, links to supplemental material, movie connections, books that influenced this book, books influenced by this book and books that cite this book sections. If you would like to add content to them, you must first make them visible.