In Defense of Food: An Eater's Manifesto
 

In Defense of Food

by Michael Pollan

What to eat, what not to eat, and how to think about health: a manifesto for our times

"Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants." These simple words go to the heart of Michael Pollan's In Defense of Food, the well-considered answers he provides to the questions posed in the bestselling The Omnivore's Dilemma.

Humans used to know how to eat well, Pollan argues. But the... (read more)

Top tags: foodnonfictionhealthnon-fictionnutrition (all tags)

 

Member Reviews

  • jmadigan
    1 of 1 members found this review helpful.
    • Rated 3 stars

    This book by Michael Pollen about nutrition and eating well does signal a bit of a departure for me. Pollen's manifesto here isn't actually that much about nutrition, though. His specific advice about what to eat doesn't get much more specific than what he presents as both his "eater's manifesto" and his seven word summary of the whole book: "Eat food, not to much, mostly plants." The rest is just elaboration. The elaboration starts with Pollen's differentiating "food" from "non-food." He does this mainly by railing against what he calls "nutritionism," which is the recent trend where food scientists (and food marketing professionals) focus on the nutritional content of food rather than whole foods. A lot of this has its genesis from when the U.S. government wanted to recommend eating less meat and dairy, but the lobby groups from those industries had a Class A freakout and through political pressures got the recommendations changed to focus more on nutrients rather than foods. So "Eat less meat and dairy" got malformed into "Choose lean protein sources like fish, chicken, and fat-free dairy products." This is bad, Pollen argues, because scientists and policy makers don't know that much about how the individual nutrients behave outside of their complex, whole food systems. And, worse, they're sometimes wrong in entirely harmful ways. Think margarine here. This whole nutrient obsession has also created bizarre creations like low carb pasta (what?), fat-free half-and-half (what IS one of the halves, then?), and other culinary impossibilities. Pollen goes into detail about why such concoctions are not "food" per se, but "food products" and generally bad for you. His advice is generally to avoid anything that your great-grandmother wouldn't recognize as food, especially if it tries to make health claims. Replace that stuff with whole foods, especially plants and especially the leafy greens of plants. In general, a lot of Pollen's suggestions make sense, and the book is written in an easy to read, almost conversational tone that makes it easy to (pardon the pun) digest. Some of his advice is hard to swallow (dang, another pun), like eschewing (oops, puns everywhere) anything with more than five ingredients and only buying stuff that you've either grown yourself our bought directly from a grower. Still, it's good food for thought (ah, sorry), and a lot of what he says about how senselessly the government regulates food labeling gives you plenty to chew on (dang, that one just slipped in there).

    jmadigan wrote this review Tuesday, April 29 2008. ( reply | permalink )
  • harieh r
    1 of 1 members found this review helpful.
    • Rated 0 stars

    this book is about healthy food.and recommend that use low fat and glucose

    harieh r wrote this review Wednesday, February 13 2008. ( reply | permalink )
  • Jacob R
    • Rated 5 stars

    Clearly and concisely grounds the weight of The Omnivore's Dilemma. This is a terrific and important book.

    Jacob R wrote this review yesterday. ( reply | permalink )
  • Greenviolet
    • Rated 4 stars

    I finished reading this book just this morning. It's less lengthy than the other books of his I have (and have not yet read: The Omnivore's Dilemma and Botany of Desire). I do look forward to those other books, but I was invigorated by In Defense of Food as it takes an informed activist approach to looking at how and why we eat the way we do, and what "forces" are interested in maintaining that zeitgeist.
    The option Pollan counters with is so simple, so logical, so easy (once one gets past some newly acquired habits) that it begs to be adopted. What a relief to drop the mania to look for the newest nutritional study for guidance, the need to be a chemist to figure out what to look for in food labeling.

    This fits so well, so hand-in-glove, with some other threads in my life, towards simplicity in structure, toward logic and pragmatism, toward acting upon ideals, toward health, toward gardening expansion. This is a book of substance, but a pretty easy and fast read. Recommended.

    Greenviolet wrote this review 13 days ago. ( reply | permalink )
  • Samantha S
    • Rated 5 stars

    This book transformed my life. And I only say that if I really mean it.

    Samantha S wrote this review 2 weeks ago. ( reply | permalink )
  • Michele P
    • Rated 5 stars

    Michael Pollan does it again with his commonsense, practical look at our food system and how we eat in America. Everyone should read this - our only hope for creating a sustainable food system in the future is to start looking at things as closely, and objectively, as Pollan.

    Michele P wrote this review 2 weeks ago. ( reply | permalink )
  • Honeybee Quilter
    • Rated 4 stars

    An enlightening view of the food industry and how they twist marketing for their needs. Shows how far we are removed from what we eat!

    Honeybee Quilter wrote this review Wednesday, October 22 2008. ( reply | permalink )
  • Janice H
    • Rated 3 stars

    You have to love the book's main idea in a nutshell: Eat food, not too much, mostly plants. I wouldn't mind a poster of it. What stood out for me the most wasn't just the harmful effects of nutritionism on our health, but the harmful effects of industrialized farming on our food supply. It's all rather depressing in that, despite the simple slogan, you really have to work hard and be pretty knowledgeable to eat a decent diet.

    Janice H wrote this review Saturday, October 18 2008. ( reply | permalink )
  • Cupcake V
    • Rated 5 stars

    read this. it will blow your mind.

    Cupcake V wrote this review Tuesday, October 7 2008. ( reply | permalink )
  • Daina
    • Rated 5 stars

    This book is excellent. I was fascinated. Yes, we all know that we should eat more fruits and vegetables, but this book tells you why, and not just the boring nutrient reasons. Pollan discusses the decline and breakdown of the Western Diet and juxtaposes it with traditional diets of other cultures. The book includes discussions of "Western diseases" like diabetes, cancer, and cardiovascular disease that are most likely linked to our diet. He talks about the limits of food science and nutritionism and suggests a holistic approach. Pollan describes the deleterious effect the government has on our diet. And at the end he supplies the reader with a list of rules to heal one's diet. I found myself guilty on several points in his book, but its never too late to change, right? Perhaps my description of this book is dry, but I really value this book's information and hope that it will somehow influence Americans to take more thought about food. After reading it, I want to go live with the aborigines.

    Daina wrote this review Thursday, October 2 2008. ( reply | permalink )
Displaying 1-10 of 91 reviews
© 2008 Shelfari, Inc. | Portions of Shelfari.com are Copyright © 1996-2008 Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates. Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy | Copyright Policy