Books

Discussions

  • Sign in to post a comment on this book.

  • Hannah McGhost

    hannah mcghost said:

    I go back and forth with the "are they the same" question, too. Some 'facts' overlap, but then others contradict them, so it's not "chartable" like that, but then, some of these 'facts' could be lost in the retelling? A lot of the characters, like the book itself, seem like such a performance, and what's real is not the characters being the same, or them being separate individuals, but the idea behind them, their stories. If he's trying to construct it like an overlapping story, it really fails -- it's too much like a puzzle, which is just boring, frankly, and doesn't gel with what he's written.

    posted Friday, September 26 2008
  • bella twilight

    bella twilight said:

    it was okay. too woody allen-ish. unfortunate events, horseradish, and latke are better

    posted Monday, January 21 2008
  • Informationoverlord

    informationoverlord said:

    Annoying, playful, teasing, compelling ... yes, this book is all of these things. Essentially a short story collection, but one that is sort of tied together but sort of isn't. Are the characters that reappear the same people or just ones that share the same names? Does it matter? I've read it twice (second time to 'figure it out') and am still undecided as to whether it is utter rubbish or a work of genius.

    posted Wednesday, July 11 2007 ( | view 1 reply )
Advertisement