Books

Discussions

  • Sign in to post a comment on this book.

  • Heba k

    heba k said:

    i certainly dislike that book!!! till the last sentence i was wondering where's da big event in here!!! and there r so many other things that makes me dislike it:S:S

    posted Saturday, October 18 2008 ( | view 1 reply )
  • Selina C

    selina c said:

    I had to read this for an English paper, wouldn't have picked it up otherwise. Lots of description, not much story. I did enjoy it, although it is more poetry than prose.

    posted Sunday, September 28 2008
  • Alizabeth  S

    alizabeth s said:

    I'm surprised to see so many people don't like this book. I love it! One of the best. Does anyone else agree with me? Beautifully written. Great love story without any real love. My favorite part is that it admires the simplicity of motherhood and womanhood. Really romantic.

    posted Saturday, September 27 2008 ( | view 5 replies )
  • Melissa

    melissa said:

    I quit reading after the first few chapters...hope I didn't miss anything!

    posted Tuesday, April 15 2008 ( | view 5 replies )
  • uplandpoet

    uplandpoet said:

    Have you been bombarded by complete strangers who wanted to know, after you have
    written a review, and/or made comments expressing your opinion of a book,
    whether they should read this book? And it isn't that they took the time to see
    who you are, then ask in a note, no, they just spammed you and everyone else on
    Shelfari who has said book on shelf. Does this irriate you? If so, you can do
    something about it: you can contact either of the two Shelfari reps below, or
    better yet, you can contact both of them and ask them to please remove the new
    and annoying feature that allows this spamming!

    http://www.shelfari.com/amanda

    http://www.shelfari.com/timothygray

    posted Wednesday, March 26 2008
  • Terrie  S

    terrie s said:

    My guilt at not liking this book was immense and puzzling. I am glad there were others who felt the same.----I even read it as a literature consuming adult.

    posted Thursday, February 7 2008
  • coloreader said:

    My kids would so agree with you, Joshua! This was required reading in high school here in the Midwest, and all three of them loathed the writing style of Cather. My older son said, "how many sentences does it take to describe a blade of grass blowing in the wind?!" Maybe it's an age thing. p.s. the plains of the midwest ARE flat and boring. If they had mountains, they wouldn't be plains.

    posted Thursday, February 7 2008
  • Kelli J

    kelli j said:

    The story of the wedding party is just terrible! I kept reading it over and over, certain that I had read in wrong. How could Pavel have done that?

    posted Thursday, January 31 2008
  • uplandpoet

    uplandpoet said:

    It aint that its old, just well written, look for quality in modern work. it is still there. try Gloria Naylor, Toni Morrison, Clyde Egderton, Bailey White, Barbara Kingsolver, Harriet Doer, Lee Smith, Alice Hoffman (some of it), and others. It is still there, just 125,000 new books and 25 good ones every year:)

    posted Friday, October 12 2007
  • tomherndon

    tomherndon said:

    Stories like this and her others make me wish the "modern" crap would spend more time valuing simple and real living. So much entertainment today is based on conflicts/revenge/selfish immoral decisions. In the Cather-verse, people just do what people should do to see each other well off without all of the delusional self stroking. And what she portrays is not some idealistic/unreachable Utopia, it just wouldn't make for good wifeswap fodder. . .

    posted Thursday, October 11 2007

Displaying 1-10 of 14 discussions

Advertisement