The Unbearable Lightness of Being: Twentieth Anniversary Edition
 

The Unbearable Lightness of Being

by Milan Kundera

When The Unbearable Lightness of Being was first published in English, it was hailed as "a work of the boldest mastery, originality, and richness" by critic Elizabeth Hardwick and named one of the best books of 1984 by the New York Times Book Review. It went on to win the Los Angeles Times Book Prize for Fiction and quickly became an international bestseller. Twenty years later, the novel... (read more)

Top tags: fictionliteratureczechcontemporary fictionphilosophy (all tags)

 

Member Reviews

  • James H
    3 of 3 members found this review helpful.
    • Rated 4 stars

    How often do you find a novel starting with a discussion of Nietzsche's idea of eternal return? This is how Milan Kundera's novel, The Unbearable Lightness of Being, begins, and it becomes more complex and interesting as the novel continues into a tale of loves and lovers set against the background of Communist Czechoslovakia in the days before the fall of the iron curtain. Particularly important is the contrast of lightness and heaviness of this life as we ponder the nature of fortuity and fate in the lives of the characters. As always with Kundera, music and literature play an important role in the development of the themes with references to Beethoven's last quartets, the nature of fate as informed by Oedipus, and a pet dog named Karenin. It all comes together in the countryside as we see Tomas, the Doctor, give up his profession for love or for his principles, or for both. Challenging the reader, this author has created a puzzle of a book that is a delight to the reader who cherishes the world of ideas and their meaning for man.

    James H wrote this review Monday, November 12 2007. ( reply | permalink )
  • Jackie D
    2 of 2 members found this review helpful.
    • Rated 5 stars

    When I first bought this book, the woman at the bookstore told me she was jealous and when I asked her why, she said, "Because you are reading this for the first time." If you love it, you really love it! What I love about this book is how Kundera has more to say in the first two pages than many authors can manage in a whole book. I also love the way that Kundera weaves fantasy around history, and it comes out like real life, with all of it's desparation, desire, and concessions.

    Jackie D wrote this review Thursday, November 8 2007. ( reply | permalink )
  • poojapillai
    2 of 2 members found this review helpful.
    • Rated 5 stars

    It was astonishing how, by turns, I found myself identifying with each of the main characters. This is book is not about good or bad people. It's not even about people. It's about the chances and accidents which throw us into the course of our lives. We have just one life in which to make our mistakes and learn from our experiences and it is this that makes this life so unbearably light. This is beautiful, sad and funny book which I know I'll keep coming back to.

    poojapillai wrote this review Monday, October 29 2007. ( reply | permalink )
  • willgray
    2 of 2 members found this review helpful.
    • Rated 5 stars

    What is the nature of love?, Kundera wants to know. Why do we want to be seen, and by whom? What's the difference between our soul and our body, and are those Gnostics right? Do things happen by chance, or is there a force behind everything that becomes visible when we experience a happy coincidence? Was Beethoven right when he wrote, Es muss sein (It must be)? Are our dreams just a working out of our daily struggles, or are they a warning sign to lead us to a decision? Why did so many countries think communism was the solution? Why do we try to make toilets look so nice when they are really just the end of a sewer pipe? If aliens wrote about humans, would they name us the cow parasites? Is love for an animal a higher form of love, since we have to accept them as they are? Which is more important, a significant job, or happiness? Why do we bury people under stones? And what do people choose to write on their tombstones? Who am I? What if...?
    After I finished reading, I almost wish I hadn't read it yet. Because I wanted to read it again and experience what I had just experienced for the first time. I wanted to experience the fear that had characterized Tereza, the child of a surprisingly vulgar woman, and the one who would eventually grow to be the wife of Tomas, the doctor. I wanted to experience Tomas's insatiability, his desire to be truly happy. I wanted to experience Sabina's search for a meaningful life and the motto of her art, "On the surface, an intelligible lie; underneath, the unintelligible truth." I wanted to experience the antics of Karenin, the dog, and the terribly moving scene about her at the book's close. I suppose what I really wished is that I could just keep reading Kundera, which I plan to do as soon as possible.

    Disclaimer: It would be unkind of me not to tell you about some elements in this novel that are potentially offensive — particularly sexuality. Reading this novel is not a test of your faith or a determiner of whether you are mature or unwise. So if you know (or suspect) that sexuality would distract you from profiting from this novel, despite its wonders, just skip it and find something else wonderful to interact with.

    willgray wrote this review Friday, July 13 2007. ( reply | permalink )
  • Tinky
    1 of 1 members found this review helpful.
    • Rated 3 stars

    Truth to tell, I haven't read this since college. I was over the moon about it then.

    Tinky wrote this review Saturday, February 9 2008. ( reply | permalink )
  • Feloni's Official Shelfari
    1 of 1 members found this review helpful.
    • Rated 4 stars

    I was definitely the main character in this book. Milan Kundera is a modern existentialist with a profound insight on human nature.

    Feloni's Official Shelfari wrote this review Sunday, October 28 2007. ( reply | permalink )
  • adamreck1
    1 of 1 members found this review helpful.
    • Rated 4 stars

    Still giving me a great deal to think about. The idea of Parmenides' positive vs. negative as applied to Prague Spring, adultery, Vietnam (unexpected), and pets needs pause for digestion. The essential story is very masculine and floats along in speedy poetic passages. Kundera's writing is akin to Garcia-Marquez, but with more meta-fictional interruptions and philosophical breaks. Enjoyed this very much.

    adamreck1 wrote this review Friday, August 24 2007. ( reply | permalink )
  • Collin T
    • Rated 3 stars

    It's a pleasant mix of philosophy and narrative, easy to read and enjoy. You do have to forgive the fact that all the male characters are cads--totally, unrepentantly, irredeemably cheating bastards, and I was uncomfortable with the degree to which the author absolves them of blame.

    Collin T wrote this review 11 days ago. ( reply | permalink )
  • Andreea
    • Rated 2 stars

    I know many people loved the book, but to me it seemed...boring.There were parts I actually liked, but they were very few compared to the ones that I though would never end.

    Andreea wrote this review 2 weeks ago. ( reply | permalink )
  • tooly A
    • Rated 0 stars

    This book was not the type of book I would generally choose, but I read the summary when in the bookstore and feel in love with it. I get home and start to read it and fall deeper in love with every page I turn. To me, it was like philosophical theories embodied in stories to better prove themselves. And somehow, all these stories happen between a handful of people and fit together perfectly. The story was lovely, and the points made were very though-provoking. Highly recommended.

    tooly A wrote this review Tuesday, September 9 2008. ( reply | permalink )
Displaying 1-10 of 197 reviews
© 2008 Tastemakers, Inc. | Portions of Shelfari.com are Copyright © 1996-2008 Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates. Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy | Copyright Policy