Neuromancer
 

Neuromancer

by William Gibson

Here is the novel that started it all, launching the cyberpunk generation, and the first novel to win the holy trinity of science fiction: the Hugo Award, the Nebula Award and the Philip K. Dick Award. With Neuromancer, William Gibson introduced the world to cyberspace--and science fiction has never been the same.
Case was the hottest computer cowboy cruising the information ... (read more)

Top tags: science fictioncyberpunkfictionsci-fiwilliam gibson (all tags)

 

Member Reviews

  • cedell
    1 of 1 members found this review helpful.
    • Rated 1 stars

    I found this book to be horrendous, if not outright painful. Perhaps the cyberpunk genre isn't my bag, but considering that my trade currently is (and has been for almost a decade now) computer programming, it should warrant a greater appreciation for the technical aspects of the novel. Unfortunately, the ideas within Neuromancer were so far fetched that it just came off as cartoonish.

    In my opinion, Gibson awkwardly complicates ideas/vocabulary, in an attempt to show off erudition in technology and history, but comes off as pseudointellectual and immature. The style offers little payoff (if any) when the definition of terms manifest in later chapters and distracts from an already weak premise. The detective elements offered a hint of something to come, but the incongruous jargon and unlikeable characters left much to be desired.

    I have to admit it that Neuromancer is the first fictional book (out of hundreds) I wasn't able to see to the end. I read 174 pages out of 270, and threw in the towel. Granted, Gibson occasional offered descriptive imagery which many tout poetic. Despite this, it took everything I had just to finish chapter after trite chapter, finding that with each completed page I was farther and farther away from an enjoyable plot.

    cedell wrote this review Friday, July 11 2008. ( reply | permalink )
  • Gerg
    1 of 1 members found this review helpful.
    • Rated 5 stars

    One of the all-time great science fiction novels. Gibson has the ability to not such much describe a world so much as present it, more like visiting a place instead of simply reading about it. Comparisons with 'Blade Runner' (the film- not the novel) are inevitable as the future Gibson reveals is dirty and run-down, the kind of place where you could walk across a harbor on the drifts of floating Styrofoam. That Gibson works with out-of-date concepts such as secret Soviet military operations and payphones means very little- the world he imagines is believably the one at the bottom of the slide we are all currently coasting down.

    The real genius of the book is that the characters and their situations equal the believability and immediacy of the world the inhabit. We don't share their methods, but we understand each character's motivations. Gibson, like Ellroy, transcends the notions of 'genre writing' and has created something timeless and classic.

    Gerg wrote this review Monday, June 2 2008. ( reply | permalink )
  • bwoods43
    1 of 1 members found this review helpful.
    • Rated 3 stars

    For the most part, I'll pretty much pick up and read any book, although I can usually tell how interested I'll be in it within the first 20 pages. I found a copy of "Neuromancer" by William Gibson at (no joke) the dump, and even though I wasn't mesmerized by the jacket text, I thought I'd give it a shot. After all, I remember seeing the title on various greatest-books lists, realizing later that it had won the Nebula Award, the Philip K. Dick Award and the Hugo Award in 1984. The novel was full of cyberpunk action, although I somehow missed its relevance for the first 150 pages (of the 270-page book). I felt like the story would begin to make sense once I turned the page, only to find more confusion there. Near the end, I finally began to sort out the characters and the plot line, but I think it was too late to enjoy it. Now, I'm not blaming Gibson for this; I think I subconsciously skimmed the first half of the book without detailing its occurrences. If you aren't into techspeak, you may want to avoid this ... and even if you are into it, make sure you pay attention at the beginning of the book. Hopefully the book was worthy of its awards, and it definitely wasn't bad enough to trash, but I wouldn't rank it as one of my favorites, either.

    bwoods43 wrote this review Sunday, February 24 2008. ( reply | permalink )
  • Etiainen
    1 of 2 members found this review helpful.
    • Rated 5 stars

    Cyberpunk bible

    Etiainen wrote this review Saturday, December 1 2007. ( reply | permalink )
  • kulcsi
    • Rated 0 stars

    Magyar nyelven: Neurománc

    http://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neurom%C3%A1nc

    kulcsi wrote this review 2 weeks ago. ( reply | permalink )
  • Andrei B
    • Rated 5 stars

    While reading this novel you are always wondering what the hell is happening and what the author is trying to say. Then as you progress you go from clueless to just confused and in the end it all makes sense. I love this book, it's the mark of a truly great author to envision a different universe and then to reveal it to you ,but only gradually until the end, while still keeping the complex human nature of the characters intact, making you able to relate at least to the main character.

    Andrei B wrote this review 3 weeks ago. ( reply | permalink )
  • eric s
    • Rated 3 stars

    In my opinion and personal interpretation of fact, Gibson is ranked up there with Dick and deserves to be recognized as one of the true cyber-punk pioneers. Like the science-fiction forefathers (i.e., Asimov, Clark, Pohl, Herbert, etc), Gibson is a visionary in a time when science fiction needed to be revamped and renewed. In my opinion, these forefathers had the knack and thus the duty to look to the future and point out present weakness in the human condition that would lead to imminent (and often ominous) outcome. Naturally, much of this turned into soap-box rants on politics, but I like that, and I think it is socially functional as an art. For that, I thank these folks. Gibson does the same, but in a relevant and fresh facet of the over-all genre. That being the age of cyberspace, which fortunately includes all the fun; the associated grit and grandeur.

    This is one of the two reasons I spent several years in the cyber-punk world. The other reason, though less heady, is quite impressive to me. It is the simple fact that Gibson, Dick, and perhaps others were able to envision the direction of the cyber "movement." Not only that, but they were able to lend momentum and even jargon and concepts to the cyber-age. Believe it or not, Gibson is widely thought to have even coined the word "cyberspace." I always thought that good sci-fi is that which becomes true, from the most simple flip-open communication device (beam me up Scotty) to the vast construct of "virtual reality" (also one Gibson's ealry inventions).

    eric s wrote this review 3 weeks ago. ( reply | permalink )
  • Jinks
    • Rated 4 stars

    An excellent cyberpunk techno-thriller. Cage will become one of your favorite characters in all of science fiction literature. William Gibson's best, in my opinion. It's also the first in the Sprawl trilogy and it launches that off to a rocket start. I definitely recommend this book for sci-fi enthusiasts.

    Jinks wrote this review Thursday, August 14 2008. ( reply | permalink )
  • adamreck1
    • Rated 4 stars

    Never quite got around to reading Gibson's original works, even though I'm a huge fan. Neuromancer didn't disappoint. Amazing that in 1986 he was already writing with such poetic ferocity. Just trying to picture the bizarre landscapes he writes about worked my brain out. I was very excited several years ago to hear that Chris Cunningham had discussed turning this into a film, but am sincerely disappointed that the project has fallen into different hands. Throughout my read, I tried to picture what a film version of this would look like, avoiding the obvious Johnny Mnemonic interpretation. Hope they get it right.

    adamreck1 wrote this review Thursday, July 31 2008. ( reply | permalink )
Displaying 1-10 of 87 reviews
© 2008 Tastemakers, Inc. | Portions of Shelfari.com are Copyright © 1996-2008 Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates. Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy | Copyright Policy