Liked It1 of 1 members found this review helpful“When I put a review of this on Amazon it got two negative votes, I guess from cyber punk geek types, almost immediately. Ok, I found it hard to understand the techno parts but this is so stylish and would make a great film by Ridley Scott. Is that OK ? I really liked this book, guys, and girls.” see full review » see other reviews » |
Didn’t Like It“The key to writing cyberpunk or near-future dystopian fiction? Impenetrable jargon or slang spoken by almost robotic (because it's sci-fi) characters. Let that simmer for about 200 pages until sort-of-plot begins to take shape and then finish the thing up before page 250.” see full review » see other reviews » |
“Es bueno. Tarda un poco en arrancar.”
Lediaith wrote this review Saturday, March 3, 2012. ( reply | permalink ) Was this review helpful? Yes | No“I've read this but I genuinely don't remember it. What I do remember is being disappointed that it didn't live up to Neuromancer.”
cerealkillers wrote this review Tuesday, January 3, 2012. ( reply | permalink ) Was this review helpful? Yes | No“The key to writing cyberpunk or near-future dystopian fiction? Impenetrable jargon or slang spoken by almost robotic (because it's sci-fi) characters. Let that simmer for about 200 pages until sort-of-plot begins to take shape and then finish the thing up before page 250. ”
Christopher Cross wrote this review Friday, December 30, 2011. ( reply | permalink ) Was this review helpful? Yes | No“Not the easiest of reads but that's one of the great things about Gibson, his books force you r to sit up and pay attention or they will leave you in the dust.”
Sutherland S wrote this review Monday, December 12, 2011. ( reply | permalink ) Was this review helpful? Yes | No“King of the Cyberpunks”
Paul Terence Madden wrote this review Friday, October 28, 2011. ( reply | permalink ) Was this review helpful? Yes | No“I think this was my favorite of the trilogy. Have read it multiple times over the years.”
Jason S wrote this review Sunday, May 15, 2011. ( reply | permalink ) Was this review helpful? Yes | No“Even more gritty than Neuromancer, a feat I wouldn't have imagined possible. As with all good science fiction, it never really answers most of the questions it raises, merely sparks the imagination. Gibson weaves three stories together in a manner that becomes clear and much more furious towards the conclusion of the book. The last 50 pages simply flew by.”
Matt T wrote this review Monday, February 21, 2011. ( reply | permalink ) Was this review helpful? Yes | No“Future Vision - A continuing part of the cyberpunk vision of the future by Gibson. A good story, well crafted. ”
Big Picture Guy wrote this review Saturday, February 5, 2011. ( reply | permalink ) Was this review helpful? Yes | No