“this book rocked. Best I've read since Scarlett Thomas's _The End of Mr. Y_”
Cameron P wrote this review yesterday. ( reply | permalink ) Was this review helpful? Yes | No“"The Raw Shark Texts" is an interesting concept that never really rises above "interesting concept." It's a breezy read, moves very quickly and sometimes develops real suspense, and the plot is well thought-out, but it still feels superficial by the very end. Perhaps this is because the characters feel as if they could have been plucked from any novel/movie about twenty-somethings, or perhaps this is because the majority of the text is told through dialogue and seems to ignore the truly complex interiority that it could have explored...but either way, this feels like Bud Lite. It'll get you through the night, but it's never going to rise above and really challenge you.
The concept, as I said, is interesting: there exists beneath the "real world" a whole other plain of existence, perhaps another dimension (though--since this book lacks much interiority and real development--we are never sure of the real facts, just the character's observations), and in this plain of existence, there are seas and seas of creatures who feed on thoughts and memories and ideas. Most often, our dimensions never really meet, but occasionally, when someone falls into heavy thought and abstract conceptualizing...the fish are drawn to that person's mind, and the sharks begin feeding until the person becomes a hollowed-out shell of their former self. Really crazy stuff, right? Hall has developed a nice little mythology for his novel.
And I think the overall book serves as an interesting commentary on our times, on the youth generation. We have finally entered an age where we believe we can document everything that happens in our lives: we can take thousands of digital pictures, we can write daily status updates, we can (as I am currently doing) write reviews of each book or movie or album we digest, we can blog our thoughts...We feel lost when we haven't documented our lives. We fear a life adrift, where we cannot easily load our computers and search through all of the pictures we've taken over the past year. What would we do if we lost all of this? What would we do if something had feasted upon our digital selves, erased all of those memories? No matter the danger and cost, of course, we'd try to relocate our selves, which is exactly the mission of Eric Sanderson, the novel's narrator.
In theory, it's all very relevant, and very brilliant. It even incorporates innovative fonts, images, and a full flip-book of a shark attack. Very Millennial Generation.
But ultimately, it fails for the same reason that "House of Leaves" failed. It doesn't really know where it's going. The end of "Raw Shark Texts" seems to imply that the narrator has been crazy all along, and that he's imagined all of this happening, which is a real shame and a real cop-out. "House of Leaves" failed because it decided to deliberately confuse and obscure the narrative at the end (likely because Danielewski was himself lost), and "Raw Shark Texts" does the same. Where do we take this story, he must have asked. How do I wrap it up in a way that services both the character, and the commentary I'm writing? When a book tries to serve both character and commentary, all is sacrificed because the character becomes a puppet.
Hall had a chance to truly do something special, here. But in the end, while this is fresh and often compelling, it just turns out to be an interesting little novel, and that's sad because it could have been much more.”
“Eric Sanderson regains consciousness and breathing upon the carpet of a room he does not recognise and, on further probing within himself, without any memories whatsoever. A letter instructs him how to get to a Dr Randall who informs him that since he was traumatised by the death of his girlfriend Clio four years earlier he has suffered complete loss of memory, and that this is his 11th occurence. A room in his house is locked. Dr Randall warns him not to read the post that arrives through his door but eventually the Bluebeard moment occurs and Eric gives into the urge. He and us are then pitched into a world where the boundaries shift and Eric is pursued by a Ludovician shark, a conceptual predator that feeds on his memories and is determined to swallow him whole. Deeply moving, confusing, and very very intelligent”
Jo Bennie wrote this review Thursday, November 26 2009. ( reply | permalink ) Was this review helpful? Yes | No“This book was so good and intricate and unique its coming in a very close second to my favorite book i've ever read. It's brilliantly explained even though the world we enter through the "Raw Shark Texts" is completely fictional.”
Alex S wrote this review Thursday, November 5 2009. ( reply | permalink ) Was this review helpful? Yes | No“I thought it was an interesting novel with some curious uses of text as illustrations. Vonnegut did it decades ago, although in hand-drawn images. Philip K. Dick did a lot of these paranoia and alternate reality in his career and did them better. This book is good, but over hyped. ”
Edward F wrote this review Saturday, October 31 2009. ( reply | permalink ) Was this review helpful? Yes | No“hang in there until the end”
Henry Yellow wrote this review Sunday, October 18 2009. ( reply | permalink ) Was this review helpful? Yes | No“Excellent - creative, innovative, and interesting. Some dialogue was awkward (clearly not Hall's strong point), and other parts were unclear or felt like they were missing details. With this book, though, that might have been the point.”
Nels wrote this review Tuesday, October 13 2009. ( reply | permalink ) Was this review helpful? Yes | No“I will forever be looking over my shoulder, walking down the street and in dreams, for fear of conceptual fish.”
A. Liz wrote this review Sunday, October 11 2009. ( reply | permalink ) Was this review helpful? Yes | No