Books

Erastes
9 of 17 members found this review helpful.
  • Rated 2 stars

I come to bury Harry, not to praise him Because I really can’t praise this book, so I’ll attempt a great review, if not a review of a great novel. The ending was disappointing, to say the least. Although there are touches in this book that I enjoyed – the obvious (if repetitive) double-entendres throughout, Ron’s humour, Kreacher turning into a dandelion clock Braveheart – the best I can say about it is that “it’s better than Half Blood Prince”. But seeing as how I thought the HBP was one of the worst books I have ever read, this is not saying much. The thing is – before you yell at me for daring to voice my disappointment – I adored the first three books. She created a world that was a mixture of every kid’s favourites, school stories and magic – and although this had been done before, with varying degrees of success – somehow Harry hit the public imagination and these books took off in a way that The Worst Witch (to name but one) did not. Then she layered in many wonderful characters, gave them an intriguing backstory, firm friendships, a past that spoke of sacrifice, loyalty danger and treachery – everything a saga needs And then destroyed it all in Deathly Hallows. There are many reasons I dislike this book: - the constant referral to an afterlife that she shouldn’t be referring to, Harry’s range of emotion (zero) and innate selfishness and inability to look beyond the end of his own nose, the build up of strong and feisty female characters only to denigrate them into wives, cooks and lovers, the token foreigners and almost rabid denial of any taint of homosexuality – but the worst thing about it is the obvious “oh my god I’ve nearly finished, now to kill people off so I can finish the book." Consequently all of the deaths (which I won’t name) are dealt with so casually (even the Big Important Deaths) that you almost miss them – and characters that she has spent so much time and effort getting you to know and love – are cut down with almost no reference at all. To me, this approach smacks to me that JKR has lost any respect she had for her reader. Add to that the canon discrepancies (which grow steadily worse and worse since book four) and the utterly unbelievable character assassinations (Ron fades away from a bright addition with promise in book one to a comic sidekick, and Hermione does nothing to deserve “brightest witch of her age” other than learn how to cook) and I ended up with a book which – after the initial thrill of the roller coaster left me with a very nasty taste in my mouth and a sense of wasted time. Don’t get me wrong, JKR has proved that she can write a good adventure story, this (and all of the other books) is a page turner, but rather than being the Children’s Tolkien, I’m sorry to say that she’s proven herself to no better (and a great deal richer) than A Children’s Dan Brown.

Erastes wrote this review Friday, July 27 2007. ( reply | view 16 replies | permalink )
  • malusa

    malusa said:

    You loser! Of course there are deaths! IT'S A WAR! They have little time to flee, and less time to mourn!

    posted Friday, July 27 2007 ( | view 10 replies )
  • booter09

    booter09 said:

    This post has been deleted

    posted Friday, July 27 2007 ( | view 10 replies )
  • L

    l said:

    Your statements about Hermione were right on! I don't understand how anyone can really say these deaths were in due time and given the credit or reasons that they deserved.

    posted Friday, July 27 2007 ( | view 10 replies )
  • Erastes

    erastes said:

    I believe that I have the right to my own opinion - I haven't laughed at anyone for loving the book - that's their right., so I don't see why my having an opinion warrants me being a loser.

    posted Friday, July 27 2007 ( | view 10 replies )
  • Erastes

    erastes said:

    Thank you - there was so much promise to so many characters and plot devices that just were never used and that's a pretty bad thing for a writer. It was just all build up build up build up and then.. damp squib.

    I know it was a war as Malusa says, and that things happen quickly, but Snape? Dying from poison? Puhleeze. Remus? How do you kill a werewolf? Not with a wand, that's for sure.

    I liked VM's death because it was suddenly not important, he was just.. gone and Harry did right to ignore him.

    And the epilogue? Yuk.

    posted Friday, July 27 2007 ( | view 10 replies )
  • stargazer6

    stargazer6 said:

    "Hermione does nothing to deserve “brightest witch of her age” other than learn how to cook"
    Rowling said in an interview she had to edit out a lot of the epilogue which describes their professions. Hermione is a top official in the Department of Magical Law Enforcement. She is NOT a housewife.
    But as for the book itself, I can't see how Ron's hostility and later saving Harry's life and destroying the Horcrux makes him a comic sidekick. I can't see how Harry's feeling that the world has ended after Fred's death, and Percy wailing over his dead brother's body, treats that "Big Important Death" as unimportant. I can't see how the depression, obsession, maturity, humility, and courage Harry shows makes him emotionally limited. And token foreigners? Rabid denial of homosexuality? What?! And why, exactly, shouldn't Rowling be referring to an afterlife? She's created a whole universe with its own mythology and magic truths. She borrowed from real-world cultures for Hallows, hippogriffs, and the words used to cast spells, but she can't talk about the afterlife?
    I feel very, very sorry for Rowling that you're comparing her to Dan Brown. And I am strongly convinced that you wrote this inaccuracy-riddled self-defensive review to draw attention. "I come to bury Harry Potter...I'll attempt a great review." Self-important much? Yeah, maybe I've taken the bait, but I make these comments for the sake of those who haven't read the book yet who stumble upon this review.

    posted Friday, July 27 2007 ( | view 1 reply )
  • sasma_sma

    sasma_sma said:

    I don't think you get the point of the epilogue. The point was keeping it very vague “nebulous,” something “poetic.” She wanted the readers to feel as if they were looking at Platform 9¾ through the mist, unable to make out exactly who was there and who was not. If you don't like it, please don't say "Yuk", if you don't understand the epilogue.

    posted Friday, July 27 2007 ( | view 10 replies )
  • sasma_sma

    sasma_sma said:

    Absolutely agree with everything!

    posted Friday, July 27 2007 ( | view 10 replies )
  • ejab62 said:

    Well, you already know how I feel. The only reason I still gave it three stars on my shelf is because of Snape.
    It's really all about Snape.

    posted Saturday, July 28 2007 ( | view 10 replies )
  • Erastes

    erastes said:

    I feel sorry for JKR too. I know she doesn't need my approval, but I'd rather be comparing her to Pullman than Brown,. Shame that I can't.

    Hermione appears to have learned "How the Dark Arts work" according to JKR - I can't imagine when that happened, seeing as it was her worst subject.

    I can't see any of those "values" that you imbue Harry with, I'm afraid, except depression and whining.

    Bah. I don't need to justify my opinion. If you want to see how I felt about HBP or DH then go and read the Sporking communities on Livejournal. I'm happy to look straight at the Emperor and say how few clothes he's wearing.

    posted Saturday, July 28 2007 ( | view 2 replies )
  • Erastes

    erastes said:

    Which bit was nebulous? Or Poetic? I understand it perfectly actually - it's not either nebulous or poetic. It's a perfectly clear explanation of what happens next. Where is the mist? And she has gone one step further to tell us that Ron and Harry and Hermione have gone to the Ministry. *headdesk *

    Still free speech in the UK, thanks. I could say yuk to the queen, if I wanted.

    posted Saturday, July 28 2007 ( | view 1 reply )
  • The Black Jackal

    the black jackal said:

    You have said in this review what I have felt ever since I read this book. Thank you so much for writing it! It is very true!

    posted Tuesday, August 26 2008
  • David S

    david s said:

    But I like all the books. You've got to read them all to get the complete Harry Potter experience.here are all kinds of courage. It takes a great deal of courage to stand up to our enemies, but just as much to stand up to our friends.

    posted Thursday, September 25 2008
  • Rhys O

    rhys o said:

    Your not very smart, are you? It takes a certain amount of maturity to understand the book and you don't have it. Read the book again.

    posted Tuesday, December 30 2008
  • xingmei818

    xingmei818 said:

    I believe that it was quite helpful.. Most of what you're saying is quite right. However, next time, could you please organize your ideas more?? You seem to have written this without putting into mind the deal of organization and the understanding it would have given the reader. ANYWAYS, thank you very much.

    posted Thursday, April 9 2009
  • Kavya  ~Got a 2140 on her SAT's!!!!.... ~

    kavya ~got a 2140 on her sat's!!!!.... ~ said:

    It's definitely not as bad as you say it is. And JK is still my favorite author.... But there are some parts I agree with completely!!! From book 1 onwards I've admired her trait of surprising you in the end. From Quirrel to Barty Crouch Jr she always pulls off something shocking in the end. But the 6th book was completely straighforward, without a single twist, and DH follows the same way. Fans had already guessed everything about the book - from Snape's loyalty to the identity of RAB. Till that book she'd always managed to make us fall flat on our face and prove us fans's ideas wrong. But in DH.... While the after life idea I'm okay with.. Harry's role was starting to get irritating. At first I was proud of the Harry she created. Not the quintessential hero, he had his ups and downs, his faults and strengths. But then she does nothing to exploit it!! While she has the greatest character possible she does nothing about it!! And the way she built up such amazing characters like Tonks, Lupin and Colin Creevey, only to kill them in a single line. With no emotion what so ever!!! She's still my favorite author.. and DH was interesting and humorous enough to suit me, BUT it definitely wasn't her best effort!!!

    posted Saturday, July 11 2009
  • Sara K

    sara k said:

    What does it matter? it's not your book. Why did you even write a stupid review if you were just going to bring everyone down? This book IS about death, of course people are supposed to die, why don't you try writing a book as good as JK Rowling's? ] I mean when you wrote: “oh my god I’ve nearly finished, now to kill people off so I can finish the book." How do you know if thats true? How do you know if she really didn't mean that. You're a very stupid man/woman. This is also a page turner! Ron is no sidekick, Hermione can't really show that she's the brightest witch of her age because she's not really at school and how could you compare her if theres no one else there? I didn't get a very nasty taste in my mouth and a sense of wasted time! I was just crying like mad! You probably didn't read it properly, take in EVERY word, think about everything that she writes, it really makes you understand and feel it more. It is a WAR, seriously, thats why people die, thats why he's not crying all the time because they DONT HAVE TIME. I have a feeling that you really didn't read this book properly. Remus Lupin probably died like Dumbledore? He could have fallen, someone could have beaten him, he could've gotten hurt, maybe some powerful spell hit him? Snape died because he was the owner of the Elder Wand, I suspect that Dumbledore knew it would happen. Maybe he was planning it? Maybe Snape meant to do it so Harry could see the memory. I know I've never met you but, please JK Rowling's books are better than any The Worst Witch or Dan Brown? (whatever you wrote O.O) but JK Rowling is adored by many people, probably way more than The Worst Witch or A Children's Dan Brown. This book is a wonderful ending, death is the main problem in the story. I guess she's teaching children that it's not so bad when someone dies or something? I mean, if you really didn't like this story, then why did you write a review so everyone can just write comments like this? Get lost!

    posted Saturday, July 18 2009
Advertisement