Books

Discussions

  • Sign in to post a comment on this book.

  • Jenny K

    jenny k said:

    i loved this book, i've read it multiple times.

    posted 4 days ago
  • aidan t

    aidan t said:

    what's this book about

    posted 13 days ago
  • Jiajia R

    jiajia r said:

    yea i agree too because haldon acutally wanted to be the catcher in the book and it was really kool how it related to the book title and everything

    posted 13 days ago
  • Elizabeth M

    elizabeth m said:

    I both agree and disagree with you. I think that J.D Salinger did a good job when it came to naming the book. I thought that the character had an interesting thought when he was thinking about catching all of the children as they are about to fall off of the cliff. I think that this fit his mindset of wanted to be the person preserve all of the innocence of the world. But, although Holden was a easy character to relate to it was not enough to hold my interest in the book. I found it rather tedious to read though.

    posted Wednesday, September 30 2009
  • Melody

    melody said:

    This is such a great book. But I really think you need to reread it to get exactly what it is that Holden was struggling with. I do think he was a bit unstable, but his feelings were easy to relate to. He was disgusted with the world and the loss of innocence in things, like protecting his sister from dirty words sprayed over building walls. And so instead of growing up, he wanted to be the one who preserves that innocence. Really, J.D. Salinger was brilliant with his choice of the title.

    posted Tuesday, August 11 2009
  • undeactivated membrane said:

    I liked the last 100 pgs

    posted Sunday, August 2 2009
  • natalietracy

    natalietracy said:

    I've always firmly believe that it's a book you'll either love or hate, and either sympathise with Holden or find him incredibly annoying. I'm on the side that loves this book dearly.

    posted Sunday, August 2 2009 ( | view 1 reply )
  • undeactivated membrane said:

    I read the 1st 100 pgs and didnt like

    posted Saturday, July 18 2009
  • Brandon G

    brandon g said:

    Am I the only one who thinks this book is hilarious? Holden tries to talk in this misanthropic voice (and I believe there is some true disillusionment in there) but I think it just exaggerates his innocence. He's still only a teenager and is naive about a lot of things. Everyone wants to mystify him but he's just a funny, lilkable kid. What's beautiful about the book to me is the intimacy with which Salinger knows this character. I think theres is a wistfulness in how he regards Holden. He's not the psycopath's icon; he's a portrait of an everyman coming of age, written with true love. I really love this book and most of that comes from being able to love Holden through JD Salinger's eyes.

    posted Thursday, July 9 2009
  • menkah!

    menkah! said:

    “i can see why the book had been banned.

    holden's spoiled me just a little bit, or you could say.. liberated me.

    i know most of you say would say this is being a tad bit dramatic, but believe me when i say it.

    he's taught me not to be scared to be yourself... he never cared what people thought of him and neither do i.

    and i loved phoebe, she was sucha smart little girl :)

    posted Tuesday, June 2 2009 ( | view 1 reply )

Displaying 1-10 of 188 discussions

Advertisement