Julie T

• Rated 4 stars

“It was a great book, but I was a little confused by the last chapter and epilogue. Since it's aseries, I'm hoping that the next one will make it make sense.”

Julie T wrote this review Friday, May 14, 2010. ( reply | permalink )

• Rated 3 stars

“I didn't like it as much as the Tea Shop mysteries, but still very good!”

Julie T wrote this review Sunday, April 11, 2010. ( reply | permalink )

• Rated 4 stars

“I enjoyed the book but not quite as much as I did Devil in the White City.”

Julie T wrote this review Monday, October 5, 2009. ( reply | permalink )

• Rated 4 stars

“Although at some points in the beginning I found the writing slightly trite as if the author doesn't even take her own characters seriously, I ended up enjoying the story and look forward to others in the series. ”

Julie T wrote this review Saturday, July 4, 2009. ( reply | permalink )

• Rated 3 stars

“A very good mystery set in Victorian England, as a very recently widowed newlywed bride has to deal with the death of her husband and gets involved with discovering the strange circumstances of his death. ”

Julie T wrote this review Wednesday, July 1, 2009. ( reply | permalink )

• Rated 3 stars

“It improved a little bit from the last book in the series, but still revolves mostly around the ardeur. There is more background about Jason, which was nice too.”

Julie T wrote this review Saturday, June 27, 2009. ( reply | permalink )

• Rated 5 stars

“I don't typically go for romance but there are very little blatantly steamy parts. It is a sweet love story that crosses hundreds of years. It perfectly idealizes what most, if not all, women want in a man...a man who loves us for who we are and is willing to fight to keep it. ”

Julie T wrote this review Wednesday, June 17, 2009. ( reply | permalink )

1 of 1 members found this review helpful.

• Rated 3 stars

“I liked the storyline but the 1st person narrator, Ophelia, seemed very whiny. ”

Julie T wrote this review Thursday, June 11, 2009. ( reply | permalink )

• Rated 3 stars

“It was a good paranormal book without the pesky romance involved. Although I had a few unanswered questions throughout the book I did enjoy the storyline and the characters.

”

Julie T wrote this review Monday, June 8, 2009. ( reply | permalink )

• Rated 3 stars

“I liked the book, but I didn't find it as amazing as others have. It was a neat concept, but the physical impossibility of a genetic defect that causes time travel just kept gnawing at me. Otherwise the book was very well written, I know the jumps had to be difficult for the author to deal with (just in keeping chronological order of them!). ”

Julie T wrote this review Tuesday, May 19, 2009. ( reply | permalink )