Books

Follows you (block)

Requested to follow you (accept | block)

Blocked (unblock)

bibliophile1887

bibliophile1887

has 16 followers and is following 15 people

  • In
  • member since July 18, 2007

Reviews

  • Sort by:
 
1 2  | Next »
Displaying 1-10 of 18 reviews
  • The Beach House
    • Rated 2 stars

    I was so thoroughly disappointed in The Other Woman, that I didn't even bother with Jane's last two books. However, the premise of Beach House had me sufficiently intrigued to want to read it. I can't say that I'm glad I did, but it was definitely an enjoyable book.

    It's populated with the typical chick lit cliche characters. There's Jordana, a woman up on couture and perfectly manicured at all times. A truly pathetic character, in every meaning of the word. There's Daniel, a married man who realizes that after six years of marraige he's gay, but doesn't want to hurt his wife or his children. There's Michael, a young man with a cushy job who has settled over and over again for Ms. Right, only to discover that none of them were. Then there's Daff, who is trying to cope with the affiar her husband had a year ago, and Jess, their 13 year old daughter who is a typical 13-year-old trying to cope with what is happening between her parents. Let us not forget Nan, the eccentric at the center of the book. The woman who cannot help but stick her nose into every body's business and try to make everyone happy.

    Yet somehow the main character is actually the house itself. It brings these people together in a way that is truly fate-driven and, honestly, is only ever seen in fiction. The story seems so fantastic as to be almost completely unbelievable. Especially when the unexpeted visitor turns up, you realize that it's just pure emotional manipulation on the author's part. Jane Green weilds the pen well, and you are left with a feeling of satisfaction that everything does turn out well in the end. You're also left with the feeling that something like this could never ever, happen.

    bibliophile1887 wrote this review Saturday, July 26, 2008. ( reply | permalink )
  • Plum Lucky
    • Rated 4 stars

    As with any Evanovich book, this one certainly keeps delivering the laughs. Grandma Mazur has a bag of cash and she's on the loose. It wouldn't be so bad if it were hers. But it belongs to the Mob. And they want it back. But Stephanie has a leprechaun on her side, as well as Diesel, Lula, and Douglas the racehorse, who just happens to talk to people. With such memorable scenes as Lula spilling a bucket of nickels on the floor (creating a diversion) and her backside and left breast making a simultaneous appearance, to the image of a leprechaun trying to stuff a horse into an RV (and no that isn't a euphemism), with the image of Stephanie's car being blown up yet again (this time with a rocket launcher), you can be sure of one thing. It's going to be a fun 166 pages.

    bibliophile1887 wrote this review Sunday, January 13, 2008. ( reply | permalink )
  • Covenant Marriage: Building Communication & Intimacy
    • Rated 5 stars

    My fiancé and I read this the past month and we discussed it regularly. While there there parts of the book that seemed terribly obvious to anyone who is Christian, or was raised in a Christian atmosphere, there were a few of the later chapters that were enlightening. The basis of Chapman's book (and indeed, all of his books) is the general lack of communication in marriages. It's a question of communicating to your spouse what you like, love, dislike and loathe. Only when your spouse understands your likes dislikes, and why you like or dislike, can a relationship fully grow and develop. It not only requires that you learn about your spouse, but it also requires that you know yourself fully.

    It's a wonderful book to read when you feel your relationship no longer feels intimate. And intimacy isn't restricted only to sex. Emotional, intellectual, sexual and spiritual intimacy are all discussed at length in Chapman's book. It certainly doesn't take the place of counseling, but it can certainly be used to open discussion between spouses. This book is strongly recommended, not only for married couples who may be struggling, but also for newly married and/or engaged couples.

    bibliophile1887 wrote this review Sunday, January 13, 2008. ( reply | permalink )
  • Heartsick
    • Rated 3 stars

    As an acquisitions clerk for a medium sized public library, I read a lot of reviews. Sometimes books get very opposite reviews from different places. Sometimes books get similar reviews from every one. Heartsick is one of those books. Every review I read said that it was a great book, very suspenseful and terrifying.

    Really?

    I was quite excited to see that Val McDermid (a suspense author whom I love) wrote a sentence for the back cover. "Dark, distressing, and disturbing...."

    Okay.

    I just wan't feeling it. I started this book three weeks ago, and could just never get into it. I had to force myself to finish it. Not that it's a terrible book, not at all. I've read worse. But I expected so much more with so many glowing and positive reviews. And it was only ... fair. Gretchen was frightening, but certainly not terrifying. And as much as I wanted to by sympathetic to Archie Sheridan, I just wanted to kick him and tell him to get over it. Granted, something like that is very difficult to deal with. At the same time it was so very obvious that he still wanted to be dominated by Gretchen. Which made the ending seem very shallow and insincere. As for the "plucky reporter" she was so much like a tough Stephanie Plum it was very difficult for me to take her seriously as a character. She was completely immature and very difficult to identify with. I don't know how she became a reporter in the first place. The characters had depth to them, but there was nothing in any of them that made me care about their outcome. No redeeming qualities.

    As for the story, it was obvious fairly early on who the After School Killer was, and his motivation just added to the incredulity of the plot. Cain tied everything down to one single point at the end, relating Gretchen to the current case, and it was thoroughly unnecessary. Overall, for a first thriller novel, it was a good outing. And if she improves over time (as some authors do), she may just end up creating quite a name for herself in the field. Gretchen and Archie and even Susan may be back for another book. And I might read it. Depends what's on TV.

    bibliophile1887 wrote this review Saturday, October 6, 2007. ( reply | permalink )
  • First Among Sequels
    2 of 2 members found this review helpful.
    • Rated 5 stars

    It is fourteen years since Thursday Next pegged out at the 1988 SuperHoop, and the Special Operations Network has been disbanded. Using Swindon's Acme Carpets as a front, Thursday and her colleagues Bowden, Stig and Spike continue their same professions, but illegally.

    Of course, this front is itself a front for Thursday's continued work at Jurisfiction, the Policing agency within the bookworld, and she is soon grappling with a recalcitrant new apprentice, an inter-genre war or two, and the inexplicable departure of comedy from the once-hilarious Thomas Hardy books.

    As the Council of Genres decree that making books interactive will boost flagging readership levels and Goliath attempt to perfect a trans-fictional tourist coach, Thursday finds herself in the onerous position of having to side with the enemy to destroy a greater evil that threatens the very fabric of the reading experience.

    With Aornis Hades once again on the prowl, an idle sixteen-year-old son who would rather sleep in than save the world from the end of time, a government with a dangerously high stupidity surplus and the Swindon Stiltonistas trying to muscle in on her cheese-smuggling business, Thursday must once again travel to the very outer limits of acceptable narrative possibilities to triumph against increasing odds.


    After Jasper's last two (equally hilarious) books - which were unfortunately not Next titles - stepping back into Swindon and Jurisfiction was like slipping into a comfortable sweatshirt after thinking you'd lost it. The characters were just as vivid and real as they always had been. (Well, apart from Jenny and Thursday's father, but even then, very good and plausible reasons are given.) The plot was just as engrossing as any of Fforde's previous Thursday Next books, and the situations just as bizarre/believable.

    New characters are introduced, including Friday and Tuesday (Thursday's children) and a lovely employee (Isambard Bunuel) with a penchant for creating new words who is in charge of refitting books. "Posstruthful, but it makes nonsense. It's potentious new books we should be cashsquandering on, not the stalnovelwarts who will be read no matter what." What's truly disturbing is that he makes total sense. Fforde's creativity is blazingly evident in simple conversations and it makes the plots and their resolutions so much more enjoyable.

    We also get to meet a few other versions of Thursday (some not nearly so nice), and there's a return of one of the Hades family. Naturally, Goliath is up and running again, and while they have an open door policy with Thursday, she's still very wary of their corporation and the end game. Throw in the ChronoGaurd, who is worried that time travel hasn't been invented yet - even though they use it daily - a rampaging Minotaur, smuggling cheese in from the Welsh republic, a demon trying to trick people into giving up their souls and the fact that Acme Carpets has too much business and not enough time/employess to lay said carpet, and it's just another entry in the endlessly clever Thursday Next series.

    And what about the death of Sherlock Holmes and the attempted murder of Temperance Brennan? The books ends on a fabulous cliff-hanger, and I absodefinitelylutely can't wait for the next one!

    bibliophile1887 wrote this review Thursday, August 2, 2007. ( reply | permalink )
  • Cross Bones
    • Rated 4 stars

    One of the authors I met at the Book Expo was Kathy Reichs. I stumbled across her books a few years ago with Fatal Voyage and have loved them since. I’ve gone back and read an older one, but there are still two that I haven’t read (or is it three? No, two). Anyway, her most recent book (out on Tuesday the 28th) is Cross Bones.

    The main character is a forensic anthropologist, like Reichs herself. Put simply she studies bones, especially those that were found under suspicious circumstances. In Cross Bones, Tempe (the main character) is presented with a picture of a skeleton and told that it was the reason a man was murdered. She eventually finds the skeleton, and learns that it was taken from a archeological dig 40 years ago at Masada. Evidence, and quite a bit of specualtion, lead her to believe that the bones may have religious signifigance.

    Tempe eventually travels to the Holy Land, and stumbles into a cave that an archaeologist friend believes is the “Jesus family tomb.” Tempe, while escaping from religious zealots, finds a shroud and the remains of a body tucked away in the tomb. The question she tries to answer throughout the book, “Is one of these skeletons the remains of Jesus Christ?”

    The book, like the rest of Reich’s work, is based on things that have come to her in her job. While Reichs doesn’t claim to have the skeleton of Christ, she does have a colleague with an interest in biblical archaeology and especially the ossuary that was found a few years ago. In fact, the ossuary plays a small role in Cross Bones. The book is well written, and even pokes fun at itself. The mystery of who the skeletons are is wrapped up satisfactorily, and although Reichs hints at universalism at the ending, it was a very satisfying read. Like all her books, there are passages of great technological detail that tend to slow things down. But about the time your eyes start to glaze over from the detail, the action picks up again, with a brief explanaiton of what you’ve just read.

    Reichs is a “secular” author, and this book will not fit into the category of “Christian Fiction,” nevertheless it is highly recommended to anyone interested in biblical archaeology, or the study of the New Testament. It’s not a “light” book, as the main character deals with some heavy “religious” issues, such as, “What does it mean if these are the bones of Christ?” etc. But for those who have studied that portion of history, or who have an interest in general, I highly recommend it.

    bibliophile1887 wrote this review Wednesday, July 18, 2007. ( reply | permalink )
  • Locked Rooms
    • Rated 2 stars

    While I was visiting family over the fourth, I finished the latest offering by Laurie R. King. Her books never fail to entertain and mystify. They are well researched, intelligently written, and highly enjoyable. Until I read Locked Rooms. This latest book in the Mary Russell series has to be my least favorite. The basic premise is a good one. Before the first book in the series, The Beekeeper’s Apprentice, Mary Russell was involved in an automobile accident that claimed the lives of both her parents and her younger brother. Mary has always blamed herself for this accident. In Locked Rooms we are presented with the posibility that they were in fact murdered and she is not to blame.

    Also new to this book are several chapters told from Sherlock Holmes’ point of view. Unfortunately, this seems too gimicky to work, and the passages are dry to say the least. Not even the minimal appearance of fictional character Dashiell Hammett could spark my interest. These passages overlap and we are forced to sit through several scenes twice, although from another point of view, something that grew tiresome after the first occurence.

    Unfortunately what really made me dislike the book was the general ignorance of the main character, Mary Russell. In all the earlier works she is a very intelligent young lady with interests in both religion and chemisty. Certainly there are passages in earlier works where she seems ignorant, but these are always quickly rectified. Unfortunately her ignorance follows her through Locked Rooms. She seems completely oblivious to everything around her, and doesn’t even acknowledge the fact that upon arriving in San Francisco someone tried to shoot her. The fact that her family’s servants and her old psychiatrist were both murdered shortly after the accident doesn’t strike her as interesting at all, and so she plods through the book going out with “flappers” and generally waisting time.

    When we are treated with a view from her husband’s point of view we see that he has noticed her inattention and briefly thinks about shaking her to bring her out of it. Something that I was wanting to do myself. Her husband reaches the conclusion that her family was murdered 90 pages before she does. The intervening time we are left wondering just how clueless our protagonist is. She stumbles across evidence that the reader can plainly see, and clearly ignores what is presented to her as fact.

    And don’t get me started on the silliness that was the reasons behind the murders and the pot-shot at Russell. Very weak. Considering all the people that the Russell/Holmes duo have done battle against (from Moriarty’s daughter to a mad maharaja) this one was surly the most ridiculous.

    I suppose it can be argued that the reason Mary is behaving in this manner is because she doesn’t want to deal with the deaths of her family. She has locked all knowledge of them and the accident, into the rooms of her mind. I certainly see that. However, that only makes for dull reading when the protagonist is usually climbing up ladders in freezing rain, going pig sticking, or spelunking under Jerusalem.

    While the story is certainly a good one, it would have been much better as a stand alone novel. The premise has merit, just not for these characters. Still, I am a fan of Laurie’s work, and will continue to be so. Locked Rooms, while not a favorite, is still an entry in the Russell/Holmes history, and I will surely read it again. Several times. I may even learn to like it.

    bibliophile1887 wrote this review Wednesday, July 18, 2007. ( reply | permalink )
  • The Big Over Easy
    • Rated 4 stars

    Jasper Fforde has done it again! His Thursday Next novels are great, and I was initially concerned when I saw that his latest wasn’t going to be a TN novel. I needn’t have worried. His latest book is hilarious! It takes place in the same parallel universe in which his Thursday Next novels take place. However, instead of taking place in Swindon in the mid-1980’s, these take place in modern day Reading.

    The main characters are Detective Inspector Jack Spratt and his partner Detective Sergeant Mary Mary. They are called in to investigate the death of one Humperdink Aloysius Jehoshaphat Stuyvesant Van Dumpty III. Better known as Humpty Dumpty. Apparently he fell off the wall he was perched on. The question that plagues the detectives throughout the book … Did he fall or was he pushed? Actually, neither. But I’ll let you read it and find out for yourself.

    Jasper has written a very clever and witty book. There are several references to his other creation, Thursday Next. The book is full of throw away lines about other nursery characters. The gingerbread man is a convicted felon who likes to dismember people. Jack Spratt’s first wife died because she could “eat no lean” and Jack has a problem with killing giants. (Technically only the first one was a giant, the other four were just really tall.) Through a concatenation of circumstances Jack’s mother ends up with a beanstalk outside her house. Mary Mary spends all her time trying to dump her boyfriend. Apparently she’s dumped him several times, but he just doesn’t leave.

    Not only are there references to nursery rhyme characters, but there are sly references to contemporary fiction detectives. There is Inspector Moose who is from Oxford, Miss Maple and even Commander Adam Dogleash. All in all it’s a very funny book and one that I highly recommend.

    bibliophile1887 wrote this review Wednesday, July 18, 2007. ( reply | permalink )
  • The Lighthouse
    • Rated 3 stars

    I’ll admit the first book I read by P.D. James was The Murder Room. Even then, I didn’t read it, I listened to the unabridged audiobook. I tried to read it, but it kept putting me to sleep. When I listened to it, I was right there, involved and interested. So, when Lighthouse came out, I checked it out and tried to read it. Alas, I had to give up and turn back to the audiobook. I don’t know why, but I just can’t read James’ books. Nothing against her writing, I think it’s superb. Perhaps because it’s so descriptive, and that I read too fast, it’s easy for me to miss things, and therefore loose interest. Regardless, I did “read” Lighthouse, and it was the unabridged audiobook, so I “read” it in it’s entirety.

    There’s nothing critical I can say about James’ book. The characters are all strongly developed, even those that are murdered. We feel true righteous anger at the first murder, because the character was painted so perfectly as a manipulative jerk. We feel true sorrow at the second murder because the victim was perfectly painted as a sympathetic creature. The book moves along slowly, allowing the reader to sink into the roles of the characters, to learn their secrets. The only place the book picks up in speed is when they are chasing the murderer up towards the lighthouse itself.

    The basic plot structure is one that has been used for ages. A group of people are cut-off from the rest of the world, and one is found murdered. The detective (in this case Dalgliesh) is faced with a limited number of suspects from the beginning. The reason for the isolation is geography. Everyone is on an island retreat. Later, the reason for the isolation is medical. SARS has broken out and everyone is placed under quarantine. In fact, there are several very tense moments when the reader seriously wonders whether certain characters will survive to the end of the book, because of the illness.

    If you like modern English murder mysteries, this book is definitely for you. Enjoy it with a good cup of hot tea and a crumpet.

    bibliophile1887 wrote this review Wednesday, July 18, 2007. ( reply | permalink )
  • Wish You Were Here
    • Rated 3 stars

    Well, I finally finished Wish You Were Here: The Official Biography of Douglas Adams by Nick Webb. It really is quite funny. Almost as funny as reading The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy itself. There were several really cute anecdotes that are worthy of sharing.

    For those of you who have read Hitchhiker’s, remember that Vogon poetry is actually only the third worst in the universe. The second is naturally the Poet Master Grunthos the Flatulent and the worst is Paula Nancy Millstone Jennings of Essex. In the first British edition the worst poet was actually named Paul Neil Milne Johnstone. Paul Johnstone was the editor for the school paper that Douglas wrote for when he was young. After the first edition was published, Paul wrote to the publisher objecting to the insult, and it was subsequently removed.

    Consider the scene when Fort Prefect introduces Arthur to Zaphod Beeblebrox. Arthur insists that they’ve already met, to which Ford retorts, “This is Zaphod Beeblebrox not bloody Martin Smith from Croydon.” Douglas did know a Martin Smith who, thanks to Douglas, was constantly being asked if he came from Croydon.

    Perhaps the most ammusing anecdote isn’t to be found in the book itself, but something that happened. It is generally well known that Douglas was terrible at meeting deadlines. In fact, he was so late with his fourth book, So Long, and Thanks for All the Fish, that his publisher locked him in a hotel room, and sat with him until he finished it. Douglas didn’t like this very much. Occasionally when Douglas would step out Sonny would go through the papers that Douglas had thrown out. One had written on it, “Who the **** does he think he is?” “There was one page, I remember of very choice abuse, which I actually kept and had on my notice board for quite a while - even in New York, actually. During one of the refurbishments it kind of vanished, along with other memorabilia.” (pg. 183)

    Like I said, it it a very amusing book, but it isn’t without it’s weaknesses. It opens with Douglas as a child and continues through his life until the creation of Hitchhiker’s and his push for a movie. Chapter nine ends with his death in May 2001. Then Nick steps back and in chapter ten introduces his wife and his personl life. While most fans who read this book are probably most interested in knowing about the creation of Douglas’s “trilogy,” his personal life should be introduced along with the other things that happen in his life. It is quite disconcerting to read a story about his wife, only to be introduced to her several chapters later. The biography does not follow a chronological style, and in fact ends with the statement that, “Douglas Adams … was born on 11 March 1952.”

    Overall an enjoyable book, but would have benifited from some rearranging.

    bibliophile1887 wrote this review Wednesday, July 18, 2007. ( reply | permalink )
1 2  | Next »
Displaying 1-10 of 18 reviews