Books

Follows you (block)

Requested to follow you (accept | block)

Blocked (unblock)

avriette

avriette

has 8 followers and is following 18 people

The Diving Lead.

I work for the military-industrial complex. Thanks, Ike.
  • Arlington, VA, USA
  • member since March 12, 2007

Reviews

  • Sort by:
 
1 2 3 4 5  | Next » Last 
Displaying 1-10 of 61 reviews
  • Ghost
    • Rated 4 stars

    lots better than i expected with the overly-cheesy title. i read his STRATFOR books, which are quite good. this casts some interesting light on events in the 80's in the middle east, particularly in Pakistan, for those who are scholars of the region.

    avriette wrote this review Sunday, December 11, 2011. ( reply | permalink )
  • Scratch Monkey
    • Rated 4 stars

    The most important thing about this book is the insight it gives into its author. It is well-written when compared against the stacks and stacks of horrible science fiction out there, but it is lacking compared to his more contemporary works. But be clear, this is Charlie Stross's first published novel.

    As such, there are a number of, well, kind of glaring errors. Scenes sometimes just don't work from one paragraph to the next. There are really three novellas here trying to become a single novel, and the effect doesn't work out well. Personally, I found myself attached to just one of them -- but Charlie indicates in the afterword that the story was originally a novella and "deserved to be expanded" into a full-length novel. Given its also his first novel, I think it's fair that it's got some room for improvement. But, as I said, it really is quite good compared to others.

    It has been said more than a couple times that the book borrows rather heavily from Iain Banks. I think that is mostly true, but the book does develop its own flavor as it progresses. And really, is it such a bad thing to borrow from Banks?

    I kind of dislike Charlie's smug use of terms like "dog-head" and other little things he puts into the text to sort of remind us how clever he is, but that doesn't detract too much from the work (and Banks of course does this all the time); there is less of it in this book than there was in Glasshouse, to be certain.

    Lastly, there are a number of essays at the end of the book that are really quite a valuable insight into the author himself, and into the publishing world. Those by themselves (at least to me), were worth the price of admission. Oh, and the book is physically a lovely piece. Well put together (although the copyediting was pretty bad; this may be because Charlie chose to keep the book in its original form rather than updating-and-improving a work that seems to serve as an artifact).

    avriette wrote this review Sunday, October 23, 2011. ( reply | permalink )
  • Troika

    Troika

    by Alastair Reynolds
    • Rated 3 stars

    Reminded me a lot of Stross's Missile Gap.

    avriette wrote this review Thursday, September 22, 2011. ( reply | permalink )
    • Rated 5 stars

    Absolutely phenomenal. Boils down deterrence to a simple equation that is applicable to all confrontations of nation states (caveat: those situations in which both parties have rational decision makers at the helm). Short, concise, and insightful, the book collates much work on the subject and anecdotal evidence (much is made of the cold war, the 1991 gulf war, and the falklands war; some mention is made of Sadat as well) to create a whole picture of deterrence, conciliation, and the other wiles of international relations as it relates to war and conflict.

    Highly recommended.

    avriette wrote this review Tuesday, September 6, 2011. ( reply | permalink )
  • The Voyage of the Narwhal
    • Rated 2 stars

    Long, over-wrought, and largely uninteresting. Felt a lot like Lovecraft's Mountains of Madness, only without the interesting and engaging parts. Disappointed.

    avriette wrote this review Sunday, September 4, 2011. ( reply | permalink )
  • Midnight's Children
    • Rated 4 stars

    I really preferred The Moor's Last Sigh.

    avriette wrote this review Sunday, September 4, 2011. ( reply | permalink )
    • Rated 3 stars

    The portion on narcotics trafficking was quite good and about as long as it needed to be. The latter portion, on human trafficking or Trafficking in Persons, was interminably long and in many cases seemed to defend the states involved (especially Saudi Arabia).

    Overall an informative, if poorly constructed, book.

    avriette wrote this review Sunday, September 4, 2011. ( reply | permalink )
  • Foucault's Pendulum
    • Rated 5 stars

    An overwhelming literary triumph. An incredible book that has remained indelibly marked in my mind since having read it (many, many years ago), and a mark against which all books since have been measured. Absolutely unbelievably good book.

    avriette wrote this review Saturday, September 3, 2011. ( reply | permalink )
  • Embassytown
    • Rated 5 stars

    I really didn't appreciate The Scar or Perdido Street Station, though I read both of them and understood their literary significance. After reading the review for Kraken and The City & The City, I decided he had kind of changed his writing and was perhaps taking less liberty with language and was writing a little more conservatively (which was really what I needed to appreciate his writing).

    This is interesting, as this book is entirely about language itself. That being said, it's written rather conservatively, compared to the other two works I mention, with little in the way of archaic or baroque vocabulary. The vocabulary, while extensive, isn't at, say, the level of Umberto Eco, and I didn't find myself in need of a dictionary, and rarely as a verb conjugated to an extend that made me frown. No, the book is largely very available to the reader, and written very well and in fact in 340-ish pages, which is much shorter than some of his other works as well.

    The other thing I'd add to this -- I did rate it five stars, which I am less and less likely to do these days -- is that the speech at the end of the book is one of the best I've ever read. Unfortunately, it can't simply be taken out of context; one must in fact have read the rest of the book to understand it, but it's worth the price of admission alone.

    The book is tremendous, and while I was worried I'd regret it when I picked it up, I'm quite pleased I did.

    avriette wrote this review Sunday, August 21, 2011. ( reply | permalink )
  • Learning XML, Second Edition
    • Rated 4 stars

    I read this book back in 2001, and I remember thinking that it was a very useful (if very basic and accessible) text on the subject. XML has grown up a lot since then, and changed a great deal. As a perl hacker, though, this book really stands out in the shelf of books I read when learning the trade early on (well, not "learning" the trade, really, it was more like honing and expanding my skill base).

    Dated, but totally recommended for a basic treatment of XML.

    avriette wrote this review Sunday, June 12, 2011. ( reply | permalink )
1 2 3 4 5  | Next » Last 
Displaying 1-10 of 61 reviews