Books

Follows you (block)

Requested to follow you (accept | block)

Blocked (unblock)

Daniel Roy

Daniel Roy

has 3 followers and is following 3 people

Travelling the world, one meal at a time.
http://www.backpackfoodie.com
  • Montréal, QC, Canada
  • member since July 26, 2008

Reviews

  • Sort by:
 
1 2 3 4 5  | Next » Last 
Displaying 1-10 of 111 reviews
  • Heaven
    • Rated 3 stars

    The basic premise of "Heaven" is pretty fun: two friends die and go to Heaven, and soon find themselves embarked on a tour of other "Heavens" belonging to different mythologies. That basic idea felt a bit over the top to me, but funky enough that I stuck with it.

    The result went by fast, and I was entertained. I wouldn't call "Heaven" high literature; but given its short length and small price, it was a worthwhile investment. That being said, the novella has its flaws.

    I liked how Daniel and Kate were sketched out initially, and I was curious to see how their relationship would develop in the Afterlife. I also liked the idea of 'Heaven tourists', wherein the pair would go around different Heavens and see the world, so to speak. But this charming premise quickly gets swallowed up by a huge - and I mean HUGE - cosmology threat, and the story devolves into a whirlwind tour of different afterlifes.

    I'd also would have liked a bit more cultural depth and authenticity. When I read about the idea of touring different afterlifes, I kind of expected contrasting philosophies, say, between Judaism, Christianity, Hinduism, even perhaps Islam. That sounded like a great way to explore our cultural differences here on Earth. Instead, the story focuses on mythological afterlifes: Norse gods, Greek gods, even Shinto deities. It was more about visiting a geek's primer of various pantheons than really exploring views of life and death, and for me that felt like a missed opportunity.

    But ultimately, I took "Heaven" for what Mrs. Lafferty clearly explains at the beginning: a cool experiment, an attempt at serialized fiction. And with that in mind, I had fun with it.

    Daniel Roy wrote this review Monday, May 2, 2011. ( reply | permalink )
  • Oryx and Crake
    • Rated 2 stars

    "Oryx and Crake" has all the flaws and qualities of a reknown fiction author writing SF. The writing and characterization is very solid, but the SF feels tired, hesitant, incomplete. And given that the characters in Oryx and Crake are distant and difficult to relate to, that doesn't leave much to like at all.

    The prose is definitely good. Atwood knows how to draw human character, and the writing itself makes the book worthwhile. The first act of the novel is strong, with the story of Jimmy growing up in a disintegrating marriage.

    Unfortunately, the novel fell apart for me when the titular Crake enters the scene. Crake is obtuse and unlikeable. Now, the story justifies portraying him as inhuman, but if at least he had been depicted as fascinating, then I could have endured his friendship with the protagonist. Instead, their friendship felt empty, void of human feeling. As best as I can tell, their friendship is defined by watching porn and snuff movies in the dark. Things aren't much better when Oryx comes around. She's a cipher, and her backstory was pointless and sad.

    Jimmy's life might have been more interesting, except he doesn't do much. He is not the actor of his own life; he's only there to survive the novel's devastation of humanity. Even as the sole survivor of humanity, Jimmy still doesn't do much. He's a poor survivor, who looks headed to his own death through carelessness and stupidity.

    Besides this, not much happens in the novel at all. The most excitement happens when the protagonist nearly gets jumped by a herd of pigs. The future world Atwood describes never reaches high enough levels of verisimilitude, and so I'm left grappling with how I feel about the characters, and whether their universe is merely highly allegorical, or meant to be taken as serious speculation.

    The more I think about "Oryx and Crake", the more I feel Mrs. Atwood should have written this one as a short story, or perhaps a novella. As a novel, it was too long, and felt somewhat pointless.

    Daniel Roy wrote this review Monday, May 2, 2011. ( reply | permalink )
  • Solar
    • Rated 4 stars

    Physicists in fiction are generally depicted as autistic action heroes, with mighty, infallible intellects. Dr. Beard, the protagonist of ""Solar", is anything but and a breath of fresh air. He's self-centered, incapable of love, insecure and vain, and he walks the fine line between pity and brilliance.

    "Solar" is, at its core, a satire on climate change. McEwan's theme seems to be that if humanity is to be saved from the effects of climate change, it will not be through selfless heroism, but through a form of lucky confluence of greed and self-interest. This trope is fascinating and thought-provoking, and to watch Michael Beard stumble through it is at times hilarious, at times cringe-inducing.

    The science feels spot-on. This may be the work of scientific fiction with some of the best verisimilitude out there. It's neither too complicated nor condescending, and yet it reads like a physicist itself wrote it. The politics, pettiness and backstabbing of the scientific world are deployed for great comical effect.

    Some people have argued that this novel is SF. I'd warn against going into it with this mindset. Yes, there's some speculative science involved in the core themes of the novel, but the story makes no qualms about engaging the reader in a thought experiment about the future. The science is there for verisimilitude, and it works well at that. What matters is that we believe that some sort of new energy has been dreamed up by the unlikely genius of Dr. Beard, and then enjoy the ride.

    Daniel Roy wrote this review Saturday, April 23, 2011. ( reply | permalink )
  • Mockingjay
    • Rated 2 stars

    I was expecting a lot of things coming out of 'Catching Fire'. What I didn't expect was the utter disappointment of 'Mockingjay'.

    It's not so much the change of themes and tone of the novel, or the fact it takes place in wartime. I pretty much anticipated these things at the conclusion of the second novel. Rather, it's the fact Katniss seems to have turned, between books 2 and 3, into some sort of spoiled, self-centered brat.

    Whereas I rooted for her in the first books in her quest for survival, I couldn't get behind how she threw away the lives of friends as she sought revenge against President Snow. I couldn't endure her self-pity as her friends consoled her despite having been through much worse. (Poor, poor Peeta.) I didn't much care either for Gale somehow turning into a psychopath.

    All in all, the whole series felt like it was overstaying its welcome based on the third novel alone. By the end, I was glad it was over, and didn't much care to revisit this universe again. That's too bad, considering how pulse-pounding and addicting the first two novels were.

    Daniel Roy wrote this review Tuesday, May 3, 2011. ( reply | permalink )
  • Catching Fire
    • Rated 4 stars

    I picked up the second book in the Hunger Games trilogy because I was curious how the relationships of the characters would evolve. I'm glad I did. Despite some reviews saying this second book is weaker than the first, I came away from it impressed, and I felt it was a lot more powerful than the first installment.

    Some parts of the book felt a bit 'deja vu', especially the Hunger Games. But there's a lot here that I liked, and which I felt had been absent in the first book. The tone here is a lot more rebellious and subversive than in the first book, and in some ways I felt that "Catching Fire" was "Hunger Games" done right. There's a clear tension throughout the novel, and this was a good antidote to Katniss's obliviousness in the first book.

    Katniss as a character has evolved, and she's come to question some of her questionable actions of the first novel. This too was refreshing and welcome. A lot of the other characters get fleshed out more, and the world gets a lot more time, which was all great.

    My only complaint was that the ending was abrupt; but since I had 'Mockingjay' at hand, I guess that was not too much of a problem. Still, this is not a novel about resolution. But as a middle book that ratchets up the tension and fleshes out the Hunger Games universe, it's quite a success.

    Daniel Roy wrote this review Thursday, April 14, 2011. ( reply | permalink )
  • Stiff
    • Rated 4 stars

    Both gruesome and hilarious, "Stiff" is not, shall we say, 'lunch break material'. Mary Roach investigates the world of cadavers, from their use in anatomy classes to the study of body decomposition. Some parts are pretty disgusting, but just like a car crash, I just couldn't look away. It's also written with a lot of heart (hah!) and humor, which made it as fun as a good gore-filled B movie.

    That's not to say that this is all empty entertainment. There's a lot of science and history in this book, and I learned a great deal (sometimes more than I wished for) about death and science. Mary Roach approaches her subject seriously enough that she avoids repeating half-truth, going so far as visiting the Chinese province of Hainan to debunk a 'human dumplings' story.

    All in all, a tought-provoking, fun, informative book that takes a day to read and makes an impression that lasts much longer.

    Daniel Roy wrote this review Tuesday, April 12, 2011. ( reply | permalink )
  • The Hunger Games
    • Rated 3 stars

    Despite its simplistic and somewhat unbelieveable premise, I found "The Hunger Games" pretty hard to put down. It took me a while to realize this was a young adult novel, as Katniss's world is initially grim and realistic, and I found her well-drawn. But as the novel progresses and turns into a teenage rehash of "Battle Royale", she becomes a more stereotypical teenage heroine, unable to see when a man is in love with her and riddled with self-doubt.

    I really could have done without the entire romantic arc of the story, but I'm sure it sells with its target audience. The sad part of it was that, except for a few exceptions, Katniss is basically manoeuvered by other people into doing what she does. She rarely takes the initiative, and that was a disappointment. Other than that, the world of Hunger Games felt contrived to me. We're never made to understand how such a world could exist, and it feels to have been engineered solely as a backdrop and half-assed justification for the Hunger Games.

    But, all that being said, it's fast-paced, quick to read, and pretty exciting. Even though I'm left a bit underwhelmed, I sure can't think of a single moment when I felt bored. And that's saying something.

    Daniel Roy wrote this review Tuesday, April 12, 2011. ( reply | permalink )
  • Slaughterhouse-Five
    • Rated 5 stars

    An unforgettable, heartfelt snapshot of the life of a man who may or may not have come unhinged in time, and may or may not have been captured by aliens who see into the fourth dimension. "Slaughterhouse-Five" is one of the rare SF books that truly transcend the genre to produce a unique argument on human nature.

    Daniel Roy wrote this review Monday, March 28, 2011. ( reply | permalink )
  • Kraken
    • Rated 2 stars

    As much as I love China Miéville, "Kraken" is a noisy mess. Miéville's stellar prose and hyperkinetic imagination are on display as always, but what's missing is a heart, real characters, and an actual sense of plot progression and coherence.

    Whereas many of his novels feel carefully constructed, "Kraken" feels like writing improv. The novel starts with a quirky procedural in a vaguely Cthulhuoid world, but quickly skids into full-on weird fantasy, with armies of supernatural soldiers fighting in the streets of London without somehow getting noticed. The characters mostly stumble through the plot, coming and going depending on the demands of the chaotic narrative, and taking positions when it comes time to admire the noise and light of Miéville's imagination.

    The book could have done with at least a rewrite to tighten the tone, trim the prose (at 500 pages, it could have benefited from being 200 pages shorter) and inject a bit of forethought in the proceedings. Some sentences, especially near the end of the novel, seem to have been published without editing, as they make no darn sense at all.

    Overall, a major disappointment from my favorite fantasy author. Coming on the heels of the brilliant 'The City & The City,' that's quite a downfall.

    Daniel Roy wrote this review Friday, March 25, 2011. ( reply | permalink )
  • Packing for Mars
    • Rated 3 stars

    A fun, light-hearted exploration of the silliest aspects of the lives of astronauts. The book was not, as I hoped, an inventory of the difficulties involved in a mission to Mars; rather, it's a rambling history of space exploration, and all the quirks involved, such as zero-g pooping, and the sexual lives of space chimps.

    It's a science book, yeah, but definitely on the lighter side. The book is more a collection of crispy anecdotes than a real exploration of astronaut life. Still, it's fun while it lasts, and the tone is fast-paced and engaging.

    Daniel Roy wrote this review Wednesday, March 9, 2011. ( reply | permalink )
1 2 3 4 5  | Next » Last 
Displaying 1-10 of 111 reviews